Salah satu upaya Pemerintah guna memperlancar kegiatan pengembangan fungsi Kawasan Sabang, yaitu melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2000 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2000 tentang Kawasan Perdagangan Bebas dan Pelabuhan Bebas Sabang menjadi Undang-Undang dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 83 Tahun 2010 tentang Pelimpahan Kewenangan Pemerintah Kepada Dewan Kawasan Sabang yang salah satu pelimpahan kewenangannya adalah pada Bidang Penanaman Modal. Kedua peraturan ini dikeluarkan dengan tujuan memperlancar fungsi kegiatan penanaman modal di Kawasan agar dapat berjalan maksimal. Namun dari hasil penelitian, ditemukan masih ada beberapa faktor kendala dan hambatan pelaksanaan penanaman modal tidak berjalan maksimal seperti kurangnya kemampuan SDM secara internal BPKS dan sarana infrastruktur penunjang investasi, kondisi kemanan yang belum kondusif, kesulitan dalam menarik minat investor, kurangnya kenyamanan dalam berinvestasi, letak regional Kawasan yang belum strategis serta belum dijadikannya Kawasan Sabang sebagai daerah tujuan investasi.One of the government efforts to stimulate the activity of Sabang’s regional development function is done through the Act Number 37, 2000 regarding the Establishment of the Government Regulation Replacing the Act Number 2, 2000 regarding the Free Trade Area and Free Port of Sabang becoming the Act and the Government regulation number 83, 2010 on the Distribution of the Government Authority to Sabang Regional Board which is one of the authorities given is in the field of Capital Investment. Both regulations are issued in order to boost the capital investment function in the region hence it can run maximally. However, the research shows that there are some hurdles in the capital investment for instances lack of human resources of BPKS, and supporting infrastructures are, insecure, lack of effort to attract investors, lack of confortable condition, the position that is not strategic and the region has not been targeted as the capital investment region.
Aceh is a region with an autonomy in implementing Islamic law (sharia) and Baitul Mal is one of the institutions formed by the local government to support it. This article aims to discuss the authority of the state in managing zakat, infaq, and sadaqah (ZIS), and describe the authority of the Baitul Mal in managing ZIS as locally-generated revenue (PAD) in Aceh. The study used a case study approach by using the theory of authority as an analytical tool. Data collection techniques were carried out through interviews and document studies. The informants interviewed were the staff of the Baitul Mal and the staff management of the Ulema Consultative Council (MPU) in Pidie Regency and Sabang City. It found that the state, in this case, Baitul Mal, has the authority to manage ZIS which can be treated as PAD. This practice has contributed to poverty alleviation, scholarships, business capital, and community economic empowerment in Aceh. To facilitate the management of zakat funds, lex specialis can be applied as a position of Islamic law in the national legal framework.
Pasal 45A Ayat (2) huruf c Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2004 tentang Mahkamah Agung membatasi pengajuan upaya hukum kasasi terhadap perkara tata usaha negara yang objek gugatannya berupa keputusan pejabat daerah. Pembatasan ini menimbulkan ketidakadilan bagi pencari keadilan (yustisiable) yang ingin mendapatkan keadilan jika pada tingkat pertama dan banding tidak diterima gugatannya. Di samping itu, pembatasan tersebut telah merubah sistem peradilan di Indonesia yang terdiri dari tingkat pertama, banding dan kasasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui alasan pembatasan upaya hukum dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2004, tinjauan keadilan kepada warga negara dan asas-asas pembentukan perundang-undangan yang baik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif yang ingin mengidentifikasi dari aspek hukumnya. Data yang digunakan terdiri bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembatasan pengajuan upaya hukum untuk mengurangi penumpukan perkara di Mahkamah Agung. Akibat pembatasan tersebut sangat merugikan warga negara yang ingin memperjuangkan haknya dan tidak mencerminkan asas-asas pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan yang baik.Article 45 (2) point C of the Act Number 5, 2004 on the Supreme Court Especially Limiting judicial review on the decision of the object of civil administrative state’s case which its lawsuit is the decision of officials in district, municipality or provincial officials. The limitation is not fair towards every justice seekers who are willing to obtain justices in the first court and the court of appeal have not tried the cases fairly. Apart from that the limitation has changed the justice system in Indonesia consisting of the first instance court, the court of appeal, and review court of the Supreme Court. This research aims to know the reasons of such limitation in the Act Number 5, 2004, justice review for citizens and principles of well law making. This is juridical normative research, which is trying to identify legal substances. The sources of data are secondary that are primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The research shows that the limitation of judicial review is to reduce the number of cases at the Supreme Court. The result of the nullification causes loss for citizens who are trying to fight for their rights and it does not reflect the principle of well law making process.
Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) berfungsi menyelenggarakan program jaminan kesehatan secara nasional berdasarkan prinsip asuransi sosial dan prinsip ekuitas dengan tujuan menjamin agar peserta memperoleh manfaat kesehatan. Pasal 1 angka 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 tentang Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial menyatakan bahwa Jaminan sosial adalah salah satu bentuk perlidungan sosial untuk menjamin seluruh rakyat agar dapat memenuhi kebutuhan dasar hidupnya yang layak. Dalam Pasal 224, 225, dan 226 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 tahun 2006 tentang UUPA, kewajiban kepada Pemerintah Aceh untuk memberikan pelayanan kesehatan secara menyeluruh kepada penduduk Aceh terutama penduduk miskin, fakir miskin, anak yatim dan terlantar. Pasien BPJS Kelas 3 di beberapa Rumah Sakit di Kota Banda Aceh memerlukan perlindungan secara hukum dalam menerima pelayanan kesehatan yang bertujuan menjamin adanya kepastian hukum yang didapatkan oleh pasien, sehingga pasien terhindar dari kerugian saat menerima pelayanan kesehatan yang seharusnya diberikan secara baik dan optimal oleh tenaga kesehatan.Kerugian sebagaimana dimaksud berupa kerugian atas kerusakan, pencemaran, dan atau kerugian menderita penyakit/cacat sebagai akibat perbuatan/kesalahan dokter. Bentuk ganti kerugian berupa perawatan kesehatan dalam rangka memulihkan kondisi pasien, pengembalian uang atau pengembalian barang dan atau pemberian santunan yang sesuai dengan ketentuan perundang-undangan.National Social Security Agency (BPJS) has a function to conduct national health of social security based social insurance principle and equity principle aiming at securing the members in order to obtain the benefit of health care. Article 1 point 2 of the Act Number 24, 2011 regarding National Social Security Agency stipulates that Social Security is one of the forms of social protection in securing all people to fulfill basic need of proper lives. Articles 224, 225, and 226 of the Act Number 11, 2006 regarding Aceh Governance Act oblige the Aceh Government especially the poor, orphan and abandoned kids. Patients of the National Social Security Agency of Class 3 in several hospitals in Banda Aceh need law protection in providing health services aiming to secure the existence of law certainty acquired by the patients hence it prevents from the loss while accepting the health services that should be provided well and optimally by medical staffs. The loss aforementioned are damages, contamination, or suffering from illness/disability resulted from medical malpractice. The kinds of the loss are health care in recovering patients’ condition, compensating or returning things or the compensation that is not based on existing rules.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.