This study aims to determine the differences in metacognitive abilities and student learning outcomes after applying Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) learning strategies in the experimental class and the control class on the material of the immune system. The research method used is an experimental method with a pretest-posttest control group research design. The research subjects were 125 students at SMAN 2 Lhokseumawe. The parameters measured were metacognitive ability using a questionnaire and learning outcomes using the multiple-choice type test objective. Data was collected through pretest and posttest on metacognitive abilities, and learning outcomes were analyzed by parametric statistical tests using independent sample t-test. The metacognitive t-test on the score strongly agrees with the students in the experimental class and the control class, namely tcount (6.14) > ttable (1.65) significantly different. Metacognitive t-test on scores quite agrees with students in the experimental class and control class, namely tcount (0.61) < ttable (1.65) not significantly different. The metacognitive t-test on the score slightly agrees with the students in the experimental class and the control class, namely tcount (10.07) > ttable (1.65) significantly different. The metacognitive t-test on the students' disagreeing scores in the experimental class and control class, namely tcount (14.40) > ttable (1.65), was significantly different. The results showed differences in the application of CTL learning strategies to metacognitive abilities and learning outcomes between the experimental and control classes. It can be concluded that there are differences in metacognitive abilities and learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class after the application of the CTL learning strategy to students at SMAN 2 Lhokseumawe on the subject of the immune system
Pasal 45A Ayat (2) huruf c Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2004 tentang Mahkamah Agung membatasi pengajuan upaya hukum kasasi terhadap perkara tata usaha negara yang objek gugatannya berupa keputusan pejabat daerah. Pembatasan ini menimbulkan ketidakadilan bagi pencari keadilan (yustisiable) yang ingin mendapatkan keadilan jika pada tingkat pertama dan banding tidak diterima gugatannya. Di samping itu, pembatasan tersebut telah merubah sistem peradilan di Indonesia yang terdiri dari tingkat pertama, banding dan kasasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui alasan pembatasan upaya hukum dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2004, tinjauan keadilan kepada warga negara dan asas-asas pembentukan perundang-undangan yang baik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif yang ingin mengidentifikasi dari aspek hukumnya. Data yang digunakan terdiri bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembatasan pengajuan upaya hukum untuk mengurangi penumpukan perkara di Mahkamah Agung. Akibat pembatasan tersebut sangat merugikan warga negara yang ingin memperjuangkan haknya dan tidak mencerminkan asas-asas pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan yang baik.Article 45 (2) point C of the Act Number 5, 2004 on the Supreme Court Especially Limiting judicial review on the decision of the object of civil administrative state’s case which its lawsuit is the decision of officials in district, municipality or provincial officials. The limitation is not fair towards every justice seekers who are willing to obtain justices in the first court and the court of appeal have not tried the cases fairly. Apart from that the limitation has changed the justice system in Indonesia consisting of the first instance court, the court of appeal, and review court of the Supreme Court. This research aims to know the reasons of such limitation in the Act Number 5, 2004, justice review for citizens and principles of well law making. This is juridical normative research, which is trying to identify legal substances. The sources of data are secondary that are primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The research shows that the limitation of judicial review is to reduce the number of cases at the Supreme Court. The result of the nullification causes loss for citizens who are trying to fight for their rights and it does not reflect the principle of well law making process.
<p>The research objectives are to analyze the level of agribusiness competencies of smallholders with vegetable planting, the correlated factors with agribusiness competence of smallholders with vegetable planting, and the strategies of increasing agribusiness competence of smallholders with vegetable planting. The respondents are vegetable farmers who live in the sub-district Syiah Kuala of Banda Aceh and sub-district Darussalam of Aceh Besar. Sampling was done by simple random sampling. Data collection was conducted on the 77 respondents using survey, interviews and observations technique, starting in April 2015 The descriptive analysis and correlation test (Pearson correlation) were used to analyze the data.The results showed that the level of agribusines competencies of smallholders with vegetable planting in Banda Aceh and Aceh Besar including moderate category. The moderate agribusiness competence is shown by the moderate level of knowledge, attitude, and skill. There is a very real correlation between: the characteristics of the socio-demographic (age, level of formal education, non-formal education, and experience), motivation to farm, interaction and communication of farmers with agribusiness competencies of smallholders with vegetable planting. The effective strategies that can improve the agribusiness competence of smallhoders are: improve training and field school for farmers, increase the interaction and communication of farmers with extension workers, and the development of farmers groups.<br />Keyword: smallholders,vegetable planting, characteristics, agribusiness competencies</p>
Artikel ini fokus pada transformasi pesan agama menjadi produk jasa yang dapat dipasarkan melalui instagram, objek kajiannya adalah pesan-pesan yang mengandung komodifikasi layanan aqiqah, khalayak virtual yang berinterakasi di akun @aqiqahnurulhayat dan mitra layanan aqiqah yang bekerja menggiring khalayak untuk menggunakan jasa layanan aqiqah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif, dilakukan dengan metode etnografi virtual diawali dengan memasuki arena media social Instagram lalu capturing chatlog dan capturing screenshots dan menganalisis data dari entitas. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan terjadinya komodifikasi agama melalui tiga hal yaitu komodifikasi isi pesan, komodifikasi khalayak virtual dan komodifikasi mitra layanan jasa aqiqah, ketiganya nampak dari gambar dan pesan yang diposting di akun @aqiqahnurulhayat sudah mengalami adaptasi ajaran agama dengan pesatnya teknologi digital yang menggeser gaya hidup muslim kelas menengah dalam merayakan kehadiran anak di tengah keluarga.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.