No abstract
Introduction. The implementation of priorities of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation involves an assessment of the trends in the development of human, scientific, technological and innovation potential within the framework of these directions. In modern conditions of transformation of science and technology into key factors of Russian development, it is necessary to provide the country’s economy with human resources capable of withstanding “big challenges”, but at this stage there is a shortage of highly qualified specialists in many key industries that can offer a new scientific result, taking into account the prospects for its application. The purpose of the article is to develop an approach to assess the human, scientific, technological and innovative potentials in the context of priorities in the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation and its validation using the example of three priorities. Materials and Methods. The materials of this study draw on Rosstat and FSMNO ; Rospatent; Web of Science and Scopus. The object of research is to assess human, scientific, technological and innovative potential in the context of priorities in scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation. In the course of the research, a multiplicative model of the impact of the availability of human, scientific, technological and innovative capacity on labour intensity was developed. In the process of research, the following research and analysis methods were used: comparison, induction and deduction method, generalisation method, chain substitution method, logical structure study, system analysis, and special methods of statistical, comparative analysis. In the methodological plan, we used the system and process appro aches in the basis of the study. Results. The study revealed that the labour intensity in 2016 for all three priorities of the scientific and technological revolution of the Russian Federation has increased. Therefore, according to the priorities of the scientific and technological revolution of the Russian Federation, the availability of scientific, technological and innovative potential is not sufficient, which leads to a decrease in the reverse indicator of labour intensity - labour productivity in the markets within the framework of these priorities. Concerning the impact on labour intensity in all three priorities, one observes: the growth of “collaborations” in fundamental research, the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, “collaborations” of applied research; reduction in citations from scientific articles, low patent activity of engineering and technical workers, technological demand for patents. Therefore, against the background of emerging collaborative activity of actors in the process of research and development and the growth of the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, there is a low level of orientation of scientific and scientific-technical results to c ommercialisation. Discussion and Conclusions. On the basis of the multiplicative model developed by the authors for assessing the impact of the provision of human, scientific, technological and innovative capacities on labor intensity, it was tested on the example of the three priorities of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation (a, b, c). It was revealed that the labour intensity in 2016, according to the priorities of the Scientific and Technical Council of the Russian Federation, increased, and the availability of scientific, technological and innovative potential is not sufficient, which leads to a decrease in the inverse measure of labour intensity - labour productivity in high-tech markets within the framework of these priorities. Concerning the impact on labour intensity for all three priorities, it was revealed: the growth of “collaborations” of fundamental research, the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, “collaborations” of applied research; reduction in citations from scientific articles, low patent activity of engineering and technical workers, technological demand for patents. It was also revealed that against the background of the emerging collaborative activity of actors in the process of research and development and the growth of the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, there is a low level of orientation of scientific and scientific-technical results to commercialisation.
Федеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение «Федеральный исследовательский центр Институт цитологии и генетики Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук», Новосибирск, Россия 2 Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Новосибирский национальный исследовательский государственный университет», Новосибирск, Россия 3 Федеральное бюджетное учреждение науки Государственный научный центр вирусологии и биотехнологии «Вектор», р. п. Кольцово,
In Part 2, the authors are testing the methods of assessing Russian science journals citation in the natural, agricultural sciences and the humanities based on Web of Science Core Collection. The methodological approach is based on calculating citation coefficient which is a modified version of impact factor, calculated as the ratio of the number of citing documents to the number of scientific articles in Russian journals. The method is tested on the scientific articles published in Russian journals of 2012–2018 and indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection. As a result, recommendations are developed on how to promote Russian journals to the international databases based on Web of Science Core Collection taking into account the specifics of OECD domains under the examination. The general recommendations are: to decrease the share of mono-national publications thus increasing the share of articles written in the international collaboration; and to increase the share of articles by foreign authors. The study is accomplished through the funding within the State Order of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian federation “Organizational, technological, research and methodological support of promoting national journals to the international science citation bases and information analytical support of the national subscription to international science information resources for scientific and educational organizations”.
С. Л. Парфенова, В. Н. Долгова, К. А. Безроднова Российский НИИ экономики, политики и права в научно-технической сфере (Москва) И. В. Михайленко ГПНТБ России Разработка методики для выявления организаций -лидеров публикационной и патентной активности в России на основе данных Scopus, Web of Science и Derwent Цель представленного в статье исследования состояла в обосновании методического подхода для выявления организаций -лидеров публикационной и патентной активности на основе первичных машиночитаемых в формате XML данных Scopus, Web of Science и Derwent. В основу положен метод фракционного счёта, т.е. определение веса организации по числу научных статей или выданных патентов пропорционально числу аффилиаций, указанных в них. Методология рейтингования организаций основывалась на опыте построения Лейденского рейтинга (в части применения метода фракционного счёта) и рейтинга Academic Ranking of World Universities (в части расчёта взвешенного показателя на одного исследователя, выбора способа нормирования показателей). Подчёркнуто, что принципиальное отличие предложенной в статье методологии рейтингования организаций от существующих методик состоит в расчёте интегрального показателя по сопоставимым библиометрическим параметрам Scopus и Web of Science. Кроме того, предложен способ построения рейтинга организаций по среднему числу выданных патентов по данным Derwent. Результаты исследования показали, что топы-5 российских организацийлидеров публикационной активности по данным Scopus и Web of Science в значительной мере пересекаются и относятся к государственному сектору науки и сектору высшего образования. Топ-5 российских организаций -лидеров патентной активности преимущественно состоит из организаций коммерческого сектора науки. Исследование выполнено за счёт средств государственных заданий Министерства науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации: «Анализ востребованности научных (научно-технических) результатов» (730000Ф.99.1.БВ16АА02001).Ключевые слова: методология, рейтингование, организации-лидеры, публикационная активность, патентная активность.The authors aim to substantiate the methodical approach to revealing corporate leaders in publishing and patent activities based on the primary Scopus, Web of Science и Derwent data machine-readable in XML format. The approach is based on the fractional calculus method, i. e. determining the organization's weight by the number of its academic papers or issued patents proportionally to the number of specified affiliates. The organizational ranking method is based on the experience of the Leiden ranking (in using fractional calculus method) and the Academic Ranking of World Universities (in calculating the weighted value per one researcher, and choosing quality rating method). The authors emphasize that the fundamental distinctive feature of the proposed ranking methodology is that the integral index is calculated with the comparable Scopus and Web of Science parameters. For this purpose ranking of organizations is developed based on the average number of issued patent...
The study is completed within the framework of the state order of the Minstryof Education and Science of the Russian Federation “Monitoring and analysis of publication and patent activities in Russian and global science to support the national policy in science and technology” (Project No. 28.12616.2018/12.1). The authors aim at building relevant instruments for assessing and forecasting the total amount of Russian science publication based on the data of two global science citation systems, i. e. Web of Science and Scopus, with de-duplicating by digital object identifier used in both systems. The related tasks are defined: selection of the method to forecast the number of Web of Science indexed articles within the “back forecast” method; development of integral index to calculate the number of publication based on Web of Science and Scopus data; calculation and forecast of the number of articles and publications by G7 and BRICS states up to the year 2021 with scientometric methods based on Web of Science and Scopus data. The authors suggest a conceptually new method to calculate the integral index of publications based on Web of Science and Scopus data to exclude duplication. The total number of academic articles and publications (based on Web of Science and Scopus data) is calculated for the period 2007-2016, and the forecast is provided up to the year 2021.
Анализ международных и российских рейтингов научно-исследовательских организаций Представлено исследование, проведённое в рамках разработки методического подхода для выявления организаций-лидеров публикационной и патентной активности в Российской Федерации на основе данных Scopus, Web of Science и Derwent. Цель исследования-проанализировать возможные подходы к выбору организаций-лидеров публикационной и патентной активности на основе первичных машиночитаемых в формате XML данных Scopus, Web of Science и Derwent. Авторы изучили методологии таких рейтингов, как Лейденский (применение метода фракционного счёта), QS World University Rankings и Academic Ranking of World Universities (расчёт взвешенного показателя на одного исследователя, выбор способа нормирования показателей). Сделан вывод: рассматриваемые методологии не содержат интегрального показателя по сопоставимым библиометрическим параметрам Scopus и Web of Science, а также не учитывают среднее число выданных патентов. Авторы поднимают вопрос о необходимости сравнивать организации-лидеров публикационной активности и организации-лидеров патентной активности. Исследование выполнено за счёт средств государственных заданий Министерства науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации: «Разработка системы стратегического и содержательного мониторинга научной, научно-технической и инновационной деятельности в части целевых и дополнительных показателей программных документов (Стратегия научно-технологического развития РФ, Национальный проект «Наука», ГП «Научно-технологическое развитие РФ»)» № 28.13534.2019/13.1 (730000Ф. 99.1. БВ16АА02001); «Получение и обработка первичных данных международных баз данных индексов научного цитирования Web of Science и Scopus» («Научно-методическое обеспечение») (730000Ф.99.1.БВ16АА02001).
The study task is to develop and substantiate the methodological approach toward assessing publication activities of Russian researchers in the RF regions based on Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus. The fundamental distinction of the proposed method from the existing ones is that it enables to eliminate over-estimation and under-estimation of publication activity figures. Besides, it enables to analyze all the regions at once rather than individual districts or territories. The study sustains inconsistency of the sci-tech landscape in different federal okrugs (regions) and, for several of them, lacking the correlation between the research results and available resources in the regions. The study findings would enable the government authorities to make administrative decisions at the federal and municipal levels. The study was accomplished out of the funds of the State Order of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation “Organizational, technological, research and methodological support and promotion of national journals to the international science citation databases; information and analytical support of the publicly funded subscription to international information resources in science for research and educational organizations”.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.