Evaluation of Availability of Human, Scientific, Technological and Innovative Potential in the Context of Priorities in Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation

Abstract

Introduction. The implementation of priorities of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation involves an assessment of the trends in the development of human, scientific, technological and innovation potential within the framework of these directions. In modern conditions of transformation of science and technology into key factors of Russian development, it is necessary to provide the country’s economy with human resources capable of withstanding “big challenges”, but at this stage there is a shortage of highly qualified specialists in many key industries that can offer a new scientific result, taking into account the prospects for its application. The purpose of the article is to develop an approach to assess the human, scientific, technological and innovative potentials in the context of priorities in the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation and its validation using the example of three priorities. Materials and Methods. The materials of this study draw on Rosstat and FSMNO ; Rospatent; Web of Science and Scopus. The object of research is to assess human, scientific, technological and innovative potential in the context of priorities in scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation. In the course of the research, a multiplicative model of the impact of the availability of human, scientific, technological and innovative capacity on labour intensity was developed. In the process of research, the following research and analysis methods were used: comparison, induction and deduction method, generalisation method, chain substitution method, logical structure study, system analysis, and special methods of statistical, comparative analysis. In the methodological plan, we used the system and process appro aches in the basis of the study. Results. The study revealed that the labour intensity in 2016 for all three priorities of the scientific and technological revolution of the Russian Federation has increased. Therefore, according to the priorities of the scientific and technological revolution of the Russian Federation, the availability of scientific, technological and innovative potential is not sufficient, which leads to a decrease in the reverse indicator of labour intensity - labour productivity in the markets within the framework of these priorities. Concerning the impact on labour intensity in all three priorities, one observes: the growth of “collaborations” in fundamental research, the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, “collaborations” of applied research; reduction in citations from scientific articles, low patent activity of engineering and technical workers, technological demand for patents. Therefore, against the background of emerging collaborative activity of actors in the process of research and development and the growth of the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, there is a low level of orientation of scientific and scientific-technical results to c ommercialisation. Discussion and Conclusions. On the basis of the multiplicative model developed by the authors for assessing the impact of the provision of human, scientific, technological and innovative capacities on labor intensity, it was tested on the example of the three priorities of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation (a, b, c). It was revealed that the labour intensity in 2016, according to the priorities of the Scientific and Technical Council of the Russian Federation, increased, and the availability of scientific, technological and innovative potential is not sufficient, which leads to a decrease in the inverse measure of labour intensity - labour productivity in high-tech markets within the framework of these priorities. Concerning the impact on labour intensity for all three priorities, it was revealed: the growth of “collaborations” of fundamental research, the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, “collaborations” of applied research; reduction in citations from scientific articles, low patent activity of engineering and technical workers, technological demand for patents. It was also revealed that against the background of the emerging collaborative activity of actors in the process of research and development and the growth of the applied effectiveness of scientific activity, there is a low level of orientation of scientific and scientific-technical results to commercialisation.

Assessing the Learning Administration of Higher Education Institutions by Graduates’ Turn-Out and Learning Outcomes: Theory and Practice

“…Обзор работ и анализ результатов выполненного авторами прикладного исследования в области управления образованием свидетельствуют о целесообразности поиска новых решений для сохранения контингента студентов с целью выполнения вузами заданий по подготовке специалистов. Так, М. Ш. Минцаевым с соавторами на основе мультипликативной модели оценки обеспеченности кадровым, научно-технологическим и инновационным потенциалом выявлен дефицит специалистов, способных предлагать и применять на практике новый научный результат во многих ключевых отраслях [10]. Определено, что конкурентоспособность персонала в первую очередь зависит от уровня образования, в связи с чем необходима разработка программ по оптимизации взаимодействия рынка труда и рынка образовательных услуг [11; 12].…”

Conceptual framework of state economic policy in the technological and social transformation conditions

“…The essence of state economic policy, its structure, directions, forms and methods of implementation were studied by M. Mintsaev, I. Ilina, S. Parfenova, V. Dolgova, E. Zharova, E. Agamirova [5], E. Windholz [6], J. Chandler [7], L. Alderman [8] and many others. The consideration of the features of state economic policy and the justification of the mechanisms for its implementation in various fields of management are reflected in the works of various scientists, including O. Kryzhanovskaya, L. Sevriukova, V. Plotnikov, Y. Vertakova [9], A. Volkova, Y. Nikitin, V. Serba, G. Detkov [10], M. Golovko, G. Fedotova, M. Rukinov [11], O. Grechenyuk, A. Grechenyuk [12], A. Polyanin, T. Golovina [13] and others.…”

New Industrialization of Russia: Challenges to the Higher Education System

“…The significant reality of this time is the demand for advanced training, which faces a new goal-the turn-out of a new type of managers who are ready to solve problems on their own under remote access. The peculiarities of such training are: new principles of organization of the educational process, a high intellectual level of education, saturation of educational material with scientific information, emphasis on studying the mechanisms of scientific and technical interaction in the context of business globalization [7]. According to G.A.…”