Evolution experienced by the various concepts of governance ranging from good governance, sound governance, dynamic governance, to open government is a concept of the reference that is considered able to manage governance activities properly. The concept governance of anything adopted implies to reject various forms of government based on the activity of authoritarian activity, corruption, collusion, and nepotism that would open up opportunities for other evil actions in the carry out the activity of the government. The focus of the research objectives is trying to contribute knowledge by exploring theoretical conceptual from different scientific literature because it is not necessarily the concept of governance adopted and successfully implemented at the place differently. This research article is a synthesis of qualitative research, using the research method of meta-theory (the analysis of theory). This study seeks to identify all existing written evidence concerning the themes of research, produce a variety of studies are systematically used to develop and examine the theory has ever produced. The results of this study reveal the evolution of governance occurs due to a new thought to fill the lack of a concept that has been there before. Other results are also revealed that the concept of governance has a digest and refer to the innovation of the government. The concept of governance of this will be meaningless when run by people with the low quality of human resources, not smart, and it is not agile.

Banyak inovasi yang telah dihasilkan dalam pelayanan publik pemerintah namun tidak dapat menunjukkan inklusivitas manfaat yang lebih besar. Governansi inovasi memberikan kerangka kerja bagaimana inovasi dapat dikelola untuk dapat menunjukkan manfaat yang lebih besar. Penelitian ini bermaksud untuk mendeskripsikan elemen dan faktor yang mempengaruhi governansi inovasi pelayanan publik pemerintah. Metode kualitatif deskriptif digunakan dalam penelitian ini, sumber data dikumpulkan secara deduktif dari beberapa sumber ilmiah dan peraturan pemerintah. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa governansi inovasi memberikan kontribusi pengelolaan inovasi menjadi lebih baik dalam sektor pelayanan publik pemerintah. Di sisi yang lain governansi inovasi dapat diimplementasikan dengan menganalisis faktor kelembagaan sebagai pelaksana, aktor kebijakan sebagai pengambil keputusan dan partisipasi masyarakat sebagai penerima inovasi layanan pemerintah.

No abstract

The performance of a bad bureaucracy indicates a bureaucracy is riddled with problems; a pathology which arose not always coming from outside the bureaucratic body, but pathology that has been flourishing and will be exerting influence when the bureaucracy is unhealthy. This research article would like to give an overview of the incidence of the pathological bureaucracy which argumentation pathology can prevent. The phenomenon occurs that the bureaucracy could not deliver good public services and bureaucracy is a den of disease. The specific purpose of this research is focused on finding ways of preventing the pathology of the bureaucracy that comes from a variety of scientific literature. The method in this research article is systematic reviews technique that tries to identify all the written evidence exists regarding research themes. The results of this study reveal that the pathology of the bureaucracy is something to be prevented if we want the bureaucracy to run the task properly, one of the ways that can be done is to do a bureaucratic innovation (an innovation on structure, systems, culture). The innovation of bureaucracy will not only make changes to the organization to prevent the pathology of the bureaucracy but also as an ingredient to do discretion for a government policy especially regional government.

No abstract

Innovation in government activities is more directed in public services, although innovation can emphasize processes, development, planning, policies, and other activities. This research discusses governance innovation from empirical evidence that applied innovation cannot provide maximum results. The cause, government innovation that is not realized, appears only as a ceremonial act in government activities. Qualitative method analysis describes experiences, perceptions, responses through facts found in the informant's experience. This study was conducted in the Population and Civil Registration Record Office of Southeast Aceh Regency, starting from September to November 2020. In-depth interviews conducted with informants of this research consisted of government or executive, legislative, related institution, and citizen. Our field findings use the technique of hermeneutics to interpret various views that we can learn to look at the subject from every angle of knowledge (public administration, management, politics, innovation, and technology). That innovation should be supported by policies that result from decision-making, manager expertise, developed through long-term evaluation, and innovation as the basis for the quality of government public services. Governance innovation focuses on innovative action through various government instruments that lead to the simplification of action towards quality public services. For this reason, government, innovation, and how to manage are modes that continue to exist in administrative reform in government institutions with governance innovation that influence each other.

Many studies merely focus on discussing the benefits of open government, but the negative effects of open government in a variety of published literary works are limited. The advantages of open government are for citizens to get easier access to data and government activity, regulation, and policies. A particular purpose of the research explores the conceptual theoretic from a variety of scientific literature and to understand the negative effects of open government. The method in this research article is a synthesis of qualitative research approach to meta-theory analysis. Data in the research is processed deductively from a variety of scientific literature. The results of the research study aim to explain open government, or open data is not necessarily to generate transparency in government activities. Participation and collaboration in some cases are still considered yet they significantly support open government. It is because a concept may not be appropriate in different places that were affected by the characteristics of the socio-cultural, economic, and democracy of a nation.

The large bureaucratic structure will cause a range of negative consequences, comprehensive changes required. Adhocracy is one option from the many models of re-bureaucratic structure. This model is seen as an antithesis of bureaucracy that is outside the formal bureaucratic structure. Adhocracy is also referred to as the modern organization structure, innovative organization that can adapt to the changing environment. The purpose of this research seeks to contribute its knowledge by exploring a variety of secondary data, multiply a couple arguing about the concept and the form of adhocracy in bureaucracy. Meta-theory is used as a research method, data reduction in deductive to draw conclusions. The results of this study reveal adhocracy needed in bureaucracy, bureaucratic structure changes are objective needs in the last decade to get a performance of bureaucracy is more effective for delivering a quality of public services.