BackgroundRecent studies have shown the potential suitability of magnesium alloys as biodegradable implants. The aim of the present study was to compare the soft tissue biocompatibility of MgCa0.8 and commonly used surgical steel in vivo.MethodsA biodegradable magnesium calcium alloy (MgCa0.8) and surgical steel (S316L), as a control, were investigated. Screws of identical geometrical conformation were implanted into the tibiae of 40 rabbits for a postoperative follow up of two, four, six and eight weeks. The tibialis cranialis muscle was in direct vicinity of the screw head and thus embedded in paraffin and histologically and immunohistochemically assessed. Haematoxylin and eosin staining was performed to identify macrophages, giant cells and heterophil granulocytes as well as the extent of tissue fibrosis and necrosis. Mouse anti-CD79α and rat anti-CD3 monoclonal primary antibodies were used for B- and T-lymphocyte detection. Evaluation of all sections was performed by applying a semi-quantitative score.ResultsClinically, both implant materials were tolerated well. Histology revealed that a layer of fibrous tissue had formed between implant and overlying muscle in MgCa0.8 and S316L, which was demarcated by a layer of synoviocyte-like cells at its interface to the implant. In MgCa0.8 implants cavities were detected within the fibrous tissue, which were surrounded by the same kind of cell type. The thickness of the fibrous layer and the amount of tissue necrosis and cellular infiltrations gradually decreased in S316L. In contrast, a decrease could only be noted in the first weeks of implantation in MgCa0.8, whereas parameters were increasing again at the end of the observation period. B-lymphocytes were found more often in MgCa0.8 indicating humoral immunity and the presence of soluble antigens. Conversely, S316L displayed a higher quantity of T-lymphocytes.ConclusionsModerate inflammation was detected in both implant materials and resolved to a minimum during the first weeks indicating comparable biocompatibility for MgCa0.8 and S316L. Thus, the application of MgCa0.8 as biodegradable implant material seems conceivable. Since the inflammatory parameters were re-increasing at the end of the observation period in MgCa0.8 it is important to observe the development of inflammation over a longer time period in addition to the present study.
The surface of magnesium–calcium implants (MgCa0.8) was differently treated which resulted in cylinders with smooth, sand‐blasted, or threaded surface. These cylinders were implanted into the medial femoral condyle of New Zealand White rabbits. The degradation behavior and the reaction of the organism were assessed by clinical compatibility, radiographs, and µ‐computed tomography.
Magnesium alloys are promising implant materials for use in orthopaedic applications. In the present study, screws made of the Mg-alloy ZEK100 (n = 12) were implanted in rabbit tibiae for four and six weeks, respectively. For degradation analysis, in vivo µ-computed tomography (µCT), a determination of the weight changes and SEM/EDX examinations of the screws were performed. Screw retention forces were verified by uniaxial pull-out tests. Additionally, soft-tissue biocompatibility was estimated using routine histological methods (H&E staining) and the immunohistological characterization of B- and T-cells. After six weeks, a 7.5% weight reduction occurred and, in dependence of the implant surrounding, the volume loss (µCT) reached 9.6% (screw head) and 5.0% for the part of the thread in the marrow cavity. Pull-out forces significantly decreased to 44.4% in comparison with the origin value directly after implantation. Soft tissue reactions were characterized by macrophage and lymphocyte infiltration, whereas T-cells as well as B-cells could be observed. In comparison to MgCa0.8-screws, the degradation rate and inflammatory tissue response were increased and the screw holding power was decreased after six weeks. In conclusion, ZEK100-screws seem to be inferior to MgCa0.8-screws, although their initial strength was more appropriate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.