2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-18462010005000011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho em prova de vocabulário de crianças com desvio fonológico e com desenvolvimento fonológico normal

Abstract: OBJETIVO: comparar o desempenho em prova específica de vocabulário de crianças com e sem desvio fonológico. MÉTODOS: participaram da pesquisa 150 crianças, 75 do Grupo com Desvio Fonológico (GDF) e 75 do Grupo com Desenvolvimento Fonológico Normal (GDFN), entre 6:0 e 6:11, de ambos os gêneros, pertencentes ao nível socioeconômico médio. Realizaram-se as triagens fonoaudiológica e auditiva, a Avaliação Fonológica da Criança e a avaliação do Vocabulário. As respostas das crianças foram analisadas considerando o … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
26
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
26
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Results also indicated that the two children who presented performance below expected on the phonology test were not the same who presented the worst performance on the vocabulary test. Although some studies (24,25) show that vocabulary development is related to phonological working memory development since the beginning of language acquisition, some authors emphasize that the results obtained on vocabulary tests are not necessarily low in children with phonological alterations (26) , as observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Results also indicated that the two children who presented performance below expected on the phonology test were not the same who presented the worst performance on the vocabulary test. Although some studies (24,25) show that vocabulary development is related to phonological working memory development since the beginning of language acquisition, some authors emphasize that the results obtained on vocabulary tests are not necessarily low in children with phonological alterations (26) , as observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…There is an interrelation between the child's access to toys and cultural objects, activities shared with parents, and the sociolinguistic reality (7) experienced in different social and education levels (2) . The way parents interact and produce their speech are determining factors for the lexical development and more complex language acquisitions of children (6) . A qualitative analysis of information on the communicative styles of adults and the level of child development, associated with the socioeconomic and educational classification of parents, are important for the identification of different developmental profiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communicative experiences and family SES influence the formal development of language at early age (1,2,(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) . Children of different SES present heterogeneous performance in semantic evaluation tests (4,5) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher occurrence of substitutions by approximate co-eponyms and eponyms revealed substitutions of words with others that had approximate semantic attributes. This indicates a previous knowledge of the object to be named, but also highlights delays in lexical development (25,26) . It is can be inferred that the children came close to the semantic class in question but failed in the word retrieval appropriate for their age range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%