The study has developed an android-based mobile application that can assist in the teaching-learning process of civic education in senior high schools. As a research-and-development activity, it employed the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). Based on validation by material experts, the developed application was very feasible to use (89.04%), and the media experts concurred with this assessment (90.78%). During the large-group trials, the application scored between 3.96 and 4.68, meaning that it provides an excellent media or platform with high feasibility for the teaching-learning process of civic education in senior high schools.
This essay explores the factors that cause a lack of effective preparation of citizens supporting the democratic political system carried by educational institutions, especially schools. After describing the global context, in particular the tendency (trend) practices of Citizenship Education that has shifted to the sheer mission preparation productive workforce as it promoted the ideology of neoliberal role strategies educational institutions (schools), not in the setting up of citizens supporting democratic values , further description focuses on the development of the humanist school culture, which the authors believe to be an absolute prerequisite for learning effective democracy. Recently described of learning about democracy effectically, next, it describes theorization of by a description of the importance of critical pedagogy and ended by a description of the change of learning democracy into learning democracy democratically. PENDAHULUANDalam rentang waktu dekade terakhir perhatian dan sekaligus keprihatinan terhadap pendidikan demokrasi semakin intens baik dari kalangan akademis, pendidik, maupun para politisi. Terkait dengan lembaga pendidikan, perhatian lebih tertuju pada efektivitas peran lembaga pendidikan di dalam upaya penyiapan warga negara melalui proses pendidikan di sekolah. Dengan kata lain kegelisahan berbagai pihak dapat disarikan dalam pertanyaan "Mengapa kita belum menjadi warga negara yang demokratis meskipun upaya untuk itu telah lama dilakukan?".Tulisan ini mencoba membahas faktor-faktor penyebab kurang efektifnya penyiapan warga negara pendukung sistem politik demokratis yang disandang oleh lembaga pendidikan, khususnya sekolah. Setelah mendeskripsikan konteks global, khususnya kecenderungan (trend) praktik Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan yang telah bergeser ke semata-mata misi penyiapan tenaga kerja yang produktif sebagaimana yang diusung paham neoliberal tentang peran strategi lembaga pendidikan (sekolah), bukan dalam menyiapkan warga negara pendukung nilainilai demokrasi. Uraian selanjutnya memfokuskan pada pengembangan kultur
The research was an explorative research deploying interview and questionnaire as collecting data methods. Collected data was analyzed descriptive qualitatively. The research found that (1) although respondents have different conceptions of good citizens, they have shared view on main features of good citizen, namely caring others, responsibility, independence, democratic, critical, and simple life; (2) almost all of them have chosen lecturing as instructional method to develop good citizen; (3) they have found both internal and external obstacles in dealing with their efforts, such as teachers themselves and students and the lack of infrastructures of schools; and (4) many efforts were deployed, one of them was of seduction their colleagues to work professionally. They believed that it was not thought but caught by which a good citizen could be developed. They were ready to be examples.
The purpose of this study is to compare Indonesian and Malaysian elections in terms of (1) legal basis, (2) organizing institution, (3) implementation, (4) political party function, and (5) public participation. It was a library study using a qualitative approach. Documentation was used to gather information. The data were analyzed descriptively using the Miles and Haberman model. The data were collected, grouped, reduced, interpreted, and concluded. The data were interpreted based on concepts, theories, and critical analysis. Cross-checking was used as the data validity technique. The results of this study are (1) Indonesia has hosted 12 elections, some of which have been influenced by political dynamics, including Law No. 12 of 2003 concerning Elections for the 2004 Election, Law No. 10 of 2008, and Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections. Malaysian elections are governed by two laws: (a) the Malaysian Law on General Election Deed 1958 and (b) the Malaysian Law on General Election Error Act 1954. (c) P.U.(A) 293/2002 concerning the General Election (Voter Registration) Regulation last amended by P.U.(A) 106/2012; (d) P.U.(A) 185/2003 concerning Election Regulation (Post Elections) 2003; (e) P.U.(A) 386/1981 concerning General Election Regulations (Execution of Grand Elections) 1981, last amended by P.U. (A) 134/2013. (2) General Election Commission (KPU) is the name of the election organizers, whereas General Election Institute is the name of the election organizers in the New Order Era (LPU). Suruhanjaya Choice Raya is the Malaysian election organizer (SPR) (3) The election system in Malaysia is simpler and more efficient. Malaysia uses the District Election System which is based on the location of the election district, not the population. The election system in Indonesia uses the proportional election system. (4) Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy and adheres to a parliamentary democracy system. Both Indonesia and Malaysia adhere to a multi-party system. (5) The average voter turnout in Malaysian elections is 85 percent, while voter turnout in Indonesia is only 74 percent. In general, Malaysian elections are worse than those in Indonesia. In Malaysia, election organizers tend to favor government parties. Suruhanjaya Choice Raya Malaysia (SPR) barred Diaspora residents in other nations from using the post in 2018, claiming that the Diaspora favored opposition parties.
Revitalisasi Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Abad 21 menjadi isu penting dalam menghadapi tantangan abad 21 yang semakin kompleks dan dinamis. Ketrampilan abad 21 menjadi fokus utama dalam upaya meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan kewarganegaraan, yang bertujuan untuk menghasilkan generasi yang siap menghadapi tantangan global dan menjadi warga negara yang aktif dan berkontribusi pada masyarakat. Penelitian kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis data ketrampilan abad 21 yang terkait dengan pendidikan kewarganegaraan di abad 21. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kasus dengan melibatkan partisipan dari guru dan siswa pada sebuah sekolah menengah atas di Indonesia. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi kelas, wawancara, dan analisis dokumen terkait kurikulum dan materi pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketrampilan abad 21 yang diajarkan dalam pendidikan kewarganegaraan meliputi kemampuan berpikir kritis, kreatif, komunikasi, kolaborasi, dan kemampuan beradaptasi dengan perubahan. Namun, implementasi pembelajaran ketrampilan abad 21 masih menghadapi beberapa kendala seperti kurangnya pemahaman konsep dan peran ketrampilan abad 21 dalam pendidikan kewarganegaraan serta kurangnya dukungan dari pihak sekolah dan pemerintah. Oleh karena itu, revitalisasi pendidikan kewarganegaraan di abad 21 perlu dilakukan dengan melibatkan semua pihak terkait, baik guru, siswa, maupun pihak sekolah dan pemerintah, agar ketrampilan abad 21 dapat diajarkan dan diterapkan secara efektif dalam pendidikan kewarganegaraan di abad 21.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.