Background Suicide risk assessment usually involves an interaction between doctors and patients. However, a significant number of people with mental disorders receive no treatment for their condition due to the limited access to mental health care facilities; the reduced availability of clinicians; the lack of awareness; and stigma, neglect, and discrimination surrounding mental disorders. In contrast, internet access and social media usage have increased significantly, providing experts and patients with a means of communication that may contribute to the development of methods to detect mental health issues among social media users. Objective This paper aimed to describe an approach for the suicide risk assessment of Spanish-speaking users on social media. We aimed to explore behavioral, relational, and multimodal data extracted from multiple social platforms and develop machine learning models to detect users at risk. Methods We characterized users based on their writings, posting patterns, relations with other users, and images posted. We also evaluated statistical and deep learning approaches to handle multimodal data for the detection of users with signs of suicidal ideation (suicidal ideation risk group). Our methods were evaluated over a dataset of 252 users annotated by clinicians. To evaluate the performance of our models, we distinguished 2 control groups: users who make use of suicide-related vocabulary (focused control group) and generic random users (generic control group). Results We identified significant statistical differences between the textual and behavioral attributes of each of the control groups compared with the suicidal ideation risk group. At a 95% CI, when comparing the suicidal ideation risk group and the focused control group, the number of friends (P=.04) and median tweet length (P=.04) were significantly different. The median number of friends for a focused control user (median 578.5) was higher than that for a user at risk (median 372.0). Similarly, the median tweet length was higher for focused control users, with 16 words against 13 words of suicidal ideation risk users. Our findings also show that the combination of textual, visual, relational, and behavioral data outperforms the accuracy of using each modality separately. We defined text-based baseline models based on bag of words and word embeddings, which were outperformed by our models, obtaining an increase in accuracy of up to 8% when distinguishing users at risk from both types of control users. Conclusions The types of attributes analyzed are significant for detecting users at risk, and their combination outperforms the results provided by generic, exclusively text-based baseline models. After evaluating the contribution of image-based predictive models, we believe that our results can be improved by enhancing the models based on textual and relational features. These methods can be extended and applied to different use cases related to other mental disorders.

No abstract

La realidad de las mujeres sigue siendo explicada por los medios de comunicación desde una perspectiva androcéntrica, a pesar de una mayor presencia femenina en la esfera pública. En el contexto del periodismo deportivo, la cobertura mediática de las deportistas es discreta, incluso nula. Cualitativamente, la información referida a las mujeres y a su actividad recurre de manera reiterada a los estereotipos de género. Ello se debe a que, tanto el deporte en sí como el periodismo deportivo, se han construido como un territorio predominantemente masculino, donde las desigualdades de género y los prejuicios sexistas se han legitimado. La presente investigación analiza las portadas de los cuatro diarios deportivos más leídos en España (Marca, As, Mundo Deportivo y Sport) durante un periodo de cinco años (2010-2015), los resultados de la cual reafirman que “el deporte continúa existiendo por, para y sobre los hombres” (Cooky et al., 2013: 205)

By analysing the fan forum of a popular Spanish teen series aimed at young people, Los Protegidos (2010-2012), this study explores how stereotypical myths and beliefs about romantic love are maintained. The article interprets comments made by Spanish fans of the series about the reactions and behaviours of the leading couple. We found that fan forum participants evaluate the couple's behaviour according to gender stereotypes. They justify the male character's aggressive behaviour towards the female character and blame her for her mistreatment. Based on the analysis results, we reflect on the perpetuation of myths that justify violence in romantic relationships.

The presence and variety of mobile devices in Spanish homes, regardless of the social and economic con-text, has been widespread for years. Several studies focus on parental mediation in children's consumption of smart devices, however, there is a lack of scientific evidence about how the educational level and the professional profile of parents affect children’s digital media consumption. This study analyzes the influence of the socio-educational level of families on the consumption of digital screens. The study deepens the understanding on the educational level of parents, as well as their professional category. A quantitative methodology was applied on a sample of 792 primary school children, between 5 and 9 years of age, in three Spanish cities. The consumption of television, smartphones, tablets, computers and videogames was analyzed. Results indicate that, the lower the level of education and professional category of the mother, the greater the consumption of content through smart devices by children. The study demonstrates, there-fore, the importance of considering the educational and professional levels of mothers and fathers for a better understanding of the consumption of digital screens and, at the same time, as an opportunity for designing family strategies that encourage critical thinking and digital media education. La presencia y la variedad de dispositivos móviles en los hogares españoles, con independencia del contexto social y económico, es una realidad normalizada desde hace años. Diversos estudios se centran en la mediación parental en el consumo infantil de pantallas inteligentes, aunque existe una falta de evidencia científica sobre cómo el nivel de formación y el perfil profesional de las madres y de los padres inciden en las formas de consumo mediático digital de los menores. Este estudio analiza la influencia del nivel socioeducativo de las familias en el consumo de pantallas inteligentes. La investigación profundiza en el nivel de estudios de madres y padres, así como en su categoría profesional. Para ello se utiliza una metodología cuantitativa a partir de una muestra de 792 niños y niñas de primaria, de entre 5 y 9 años, de tres ciudades españolas. Se analiza el consumo de televisión, teléfonos móviles, tabletas, ordenadores y videojuegos. Los resultados señalan que, a menor nivel de estudios y menor categoría profesional de la madre, mayor es el consumo de contenidos a través de dispositivos móviles por parte de los menores. El estudio demuestra la importancia de considerar el nivel educativo y profesional de las madres y de los padres como oportunidad para entender mejor el consumo de pantallas inteligentes y para diseñar estrategias familiares que fomenten el pensamiento crítico y la educación mediática digital.

Our research utilizes a gender studies perspective in the context of television fiction research to investigate the models of the forms of masculinity and relationships that arise through the analysis of the Catalan TV series Porca Misèria/Pig Misery (Joan 2004). The methodology followed is to carry out a quantitative and qualitative textual film analysis of the male characters based on a scale, in order to evaluate the components of the love relationships. The conclusion that emerges provides four different modes of masculinity (dialogic, narcissistic, caring and Don Juan masculinity) and, accordingly, four different styles of heterosexual love relationships: ‘bonding love’; ‘inclusive love’; ‘caring love’ and ‘Donjuanesque love’. This constitutes a further step towards the future portrayal of men in TV series that manages to steer clear of clichéd representations and is more in tune with the new social realities of masculinity.

Resumen El trabajo analiza de qué manera las revistas dedicadas a los temas de embarazo, parto y crianza ahon dan en el modelo de «maternidad intensiva» de Hays (1998). Según la autora, este ideal de perfección maternal representa un gran el peso emocional porque deposita la tarea de la crianza en la mujermadre. En el artículo se concretan las características del modelo y se analiza su presencia en las secciones de ex pertos de las tres revistas familiares de mayor consumo en España (Mi bebé y yo, Ser padres. La revista del bebé y la familia, y El mundo de tu bebé). Para descubrir las estructuras narrativas predominantes, el análisis del discurso se basa en la caracterización y jerarquización de los protagonistas a partir de los roles actanciales ejercidos (madres, padres, bebés y expertos). Palabras clave: maternidad, revistas de familia, estereotipos de género, bebés.

Resumen. El propósito de este artículo es analizar la posición editorial de dos diarios mexicanos de referencia (La Jornada y de El Universal) en torno al caso de los 43 alumnos de la normal de Ayotzinapa desaparecidos en la noche del 26 al 27 de septiembre de 2014. Se analizan las editoriales publicadas sobre el suceso durante los seis meses posteriores al acontecimiento a través del método de análisis argumentativo de Grize (1984Grize ( , 2004. Los resultados muestran el diferente abordaje del mismo suceso en categorías como tema seleccionado, preconstruidos culturales, señalamiento de fuentes o enunciados valorativos. A propósito de estas diferencias, el texto acaba con una reflexión sobre las funciones del periodismo social. Palabras clave: Periodismo social; posición editorial; México; Ayotzinapa.[en] The Social Role of Journalism in Times of Crisis. The Handling of the Ayotzinapa Event by Two Mexican Newspapers Abstract. The purpose of this text is to analyze the editorial policy of two Mexican newspapers (La Jornada and El Universal) following the disappearance of 43 Mexican students, enrolled in the Ayotzinapa Rural Teachers' College, during the night of September 26, 2014. The editorial columns dealing with this topic and published during the first six months after the event, are analyzed using Grize's argumentative proposal. The results highlight different approaches to the same event in categories such as topic selection, cultural presumptions, sources cited, and evaluative arguments. Taking these differences into account, the text concludes with a reflection on the functions of social journalism.