Conclusion:A new ultrasound risk index parallels the presence of symptoms and may be a means of assessing the clinical risk of a carotid plaque.Summary: Thus far, prophylactic intervention for carotid artery stenosis is determined primarily by the severity of the degree of the stenosis. However, stenosis severity itself in asymptomatic patients is relatively insensitive in determining which patients develop neurologic symptoms. Additional variables, such as plaque morphology, may also play an important role in occurrence of cerebrovascular events and may be predictors of ipsilateral stoke that act independently or in concert with the degree of stenosis. The authors developed an ultrasound risk index (RI) based on the combination of degree of stenosis and echogenicity of the plaque surface. In this study, the aim was to evaluate the accuracy of the RI in a cohort of consecutive patients presenting with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis. In addition, the authors wished to compare this method with other wellestablished parameters, including degree of stenosis alone and gray-scale median of the plaque, for predicting potential neurologic events associated with carotid stenosis. The authors used consecutive patients with 50% to 99% internal carotid stenosis. Semi-automated gray scale-based color mapping (red, yellow, and green) of the whole plaque and of its surface was preformed. The surface was defined as the region located between the lumen (level 0) and, respectively, 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 mm below the surface. RI was based on the combination of the degree of stenosis and the proportion of red color (indicating low echogenicity) on the surface or in the whole plaque. There were 67 symptomatic and 117 asymptomatic carotid stenoses analyzed. RI values were higher among symptomatic lesions (0.46 vs 0.29; P Ͻ .001). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, RI had stronger predictive value compared with degree of stenosis or surface echogenicity alone. In a regression model that included age, gender, degree of stenosis, surface echogenicity, gray-scale median of the whole plaque, and RI, RI measured within the surface region (0.5 mm from the lumen) was the only parameter significantly associated with the presence of symptoms (odds ratio, 4.89; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-8.7; P ϭ .0000002). RI was also the best criteria to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis (RI value Ͻ0.36, sensitivity 78% and specificity 65%).Comment: These authors studied many different parameters to predict symptoms associated with carotid plaque, including age, gender, degree of stenosis, surface echogenicity, gray-scale median of the whole plaque, and RI. Of all these parameters, it is intriguing that only RI measured within the surface region located 0.5 mm from the lumen was significantly associated with the presence of symptoms. Unfortunately, the authors' RI, while an intriguing new ultrasound parameter, appears somewhat difficult to calculate, and it is unknown if the data are reproducible among differ...