No abstract

This study investigates whether and how managers' enabling perceptions of their costing systems affect task performance. We propose that managers who perceive their costing system as more enabling will have higher levels of task performance, and that this relationship occurs through the intensity with which the costing system is used and the level of psychological empowerment experienced by the managers. To test these propositions, we conduct a survey of middle-level managers and analyze the responses using a PLS model. Our results generally support our propositions. Specifically, we find a positive relationship between managers' enabling perceptions and the intensity with which the costing system is used. The intensity of use is further associated with all four dimensions of psychological empowerment (meaning, competence, self-determination, and impact). Finally, the intensity of use also has an indirect impact on task performance via the competence dimension of psychological empowerment. The present study extends prior research on costing systems, and adds to our understanding of the role managers' perceptions play in improving costing system effectiveness. Data Availability: Data available upon request.

This study investigates the role of strategic performance measures (SPM) in strategic decision-making and their impact on organizational performance. Based on 143 online survey responses from senior administrators across Canadian public organizations, the study found that SPM of efficiency and effectiveness are positively associated with performance, as well as, the former with both strategy implementation and strategy assessment decisions. The study extends prior research by linking both SPM and their use in strategic decision-making to organizational performance.

No abstract

No abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to set the scene for this special issue by synthesising the vast array of literature to examine what constitutes mixed methods research, and the associated strengths and risks attributed to this approach.Design/methodology/approachThis paper takes the form of a literature review. The authors draw on extensive methods research from a diverse range of social science disciplines to identify and explore key definitions, opportunities and risks in mixed methods studies. They review a number of accounting studies that adopt mixed methods research approaches. This allows the authors to analyse variance in how mixed methods research is conceptualised across these studies and evaluate the perceived strengths and limitations of specific mixed methods design choices.FindingsThe authors identify a range of opportunities and challenges in the conduct of mixed methods research and illustrate these by reference to both published studies and the other contributions to this special issue.Originality/valueWith the exception of Modell's work, there is sparse discussion of the application and potential of mixed methods research in the extant accounting literature.

Contemporary performance measurement systems, such as the balanced scorecard, often advocate the use of an array of financial and non-financial measures. Despite many claimed advantages for these systems, recent research shows that the inclusion of multiple performance measures sometimes has undesirable effects. The present study examines one of the potential problems of implementing these systems; namely, the impact of perceived goal conflict on task performance. Using survey data from employees working in multiple call centres in a telecommunication company, we find that perceived goal difficulty increases perceived goal conflict. Additionally, perceived goal difficulty also has a negative, indirect effect of task performance, through the mediating role of perceived goal conflict. Our results have important implications for both the research literature and the designers of performance measurement systems. Copyright (c) The Authors Journal compilation (c) 2007 AFAANZ.

No abstract