No abstract

Aims: The objective of this work was to evaluate the use of wild‐type GFP and mutant forms thereof as reporter for gene expression under high pressure conditions. Methods and Results: The intensity of fluorescence after high pressure treatment was checked by subjecting cells, crude protein extracts containing GFPs and purified GFPs to pressures ranging from 100 MPa to 900 MPa. All tested GFP’s retained fluorescence up to 600 MPa without loss of intensity. Expression of GFP under sublethal conditions was investigated in Escherichia coli with plasmid pQBI63, in which rsGFP is placed downstream of the T7 RNA polymerase binding site. T7 RNA polymerase is controlled in E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS by an IPTG inducible lacUV5 promoter. A pressure induced increase of GFP expression was monitored at 50 Mpa and 70 MPa. Conclusions: Fluorescence of GFPs is not influenced at pressures at which protein expression still occurs. We showed that the expression system used is inducible by pressurized conditions. Significance and Impact of the Study: This study proved GFP to be a suitable reporter for gene expression studies capable to detect pressure induced gene expression.

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) is widely used as a marker in molecular and cell biology. For its use in high-pressure microbiology experiments, its fluorescence under pressure was recently investigated. Changes in fluorescence with pressure were found. To find out whether these are related to structural changes, we investigated the pressure stability of wild-type GFP (wtGFP) and three of its red shift mutants (AFP, GFP(mut1), and GFP(mut2)) using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. For the wt GFP, GFP(mut1), and GFP(mut2) we found that up to 13-14 kbar the secondary structure remains intact, whereas AFP starts unfolding around 10 kbar. The 3-D structure is held responsible for this high-pressure stability. Previously observed changes in fluorescence at low pressure are rationalized in terms of the pressure-induced elastic effect. Above 6 kbar, loss of fluorescence is due to aggregation. Revisiting the temperature stability of GFP, we found that an intermediate state is populated along the unfolding pathway of wtGFP. At higher temperatures, the unfolding resulted in the formation of aggregates of wtGFP and its mutants.

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) exerts diverse effects on microorganisms, leading to stress response and cell death. While inactivation of microorganisms by lethal HHP is well investigated in the context of food preservation and the hygienic safety of minimal food processes, sublethal HHP stress response and its effect on adaptation and cross-protection is less understood. In this study, the HHP stress response of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis was characterized and compared with cold, heat, salt, acid and starvation stress at the proteome level by using 2-DE so as to provide insight into general versus specific stress responses. Sixteen proteins were found to be affected by HHP and were identified by using N-terminal amino acid sequencing and MS. Only one slightly increased protein was specific to the HHP response and showed homology to a clp protease. The other proteins were influenced by most of the investigated stresses in a similar way as HHP. The highest similarity in the HHP proteome was found to be with cold- and NaCl-stressed cells, with 11 overlapping proteins. At the proteome level, L. sanfranciscensis appears to use overlapping subsets of stress-inducible proteins rather than stereotype responses. Our data suggest that a specific pressure response does not exist in this bacteria.

Aims: This study addresses the inducibility of barotolerance by preincubation of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis DSM 20451 T under various sublethal stress conditions. Methods and Results: Stress conditions which reduce the growth rate of L. sanfranciscensis DSM 20451T to 10% of its maximum were determined. These conditions were met at 43, 12AE5°C, a pH value of 3AE7, 1AE9% NaCl, or 80 MPa respectively. In contrast to heat preincubation, other prestresses, including salt, cold and pressure led to an increase of barotolerance by hydrostatic pressure of 300 MPa for 30 min. Stationary-phase cells also showed an increased barotolerance. Sublethal pressure leads to enhanced heat tolerance. Conclusions: Stress response to salt, low temperature and acidic pH as well as starvation overlap with that one to high pressure by inducing barotolerance. Significance and Impact of the Study: Inactivation of bacteria by high pressure treatment is influenced by their history which modulates barotolerance. Mechanisms of barotolerance appear different from heat shock defence.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract