No abstract

No abstract

The processes underlying short-term plasticity induced by visuomotor adaptation to a shifted visual field are still debated. Two main sources of error can induce motor adaptation: reaching feedback errors, which correspond to visually perceived discrepancies between hand and target positions, and errors between predicted and actual visual reafferences of the moving hand. These two sources of error are closely intertwined and difficult to disentangle, as both the target and the reaching limb are simultaneously visible. Accordingly, the goal of the present study was to clarify the relative contributions of these two types of errors during a pointing task under prism-displaced vision. In “terminal feedback error” condition, viewing of their hand by subjects was allowed only at movement end, simultaneously with viewing of the target. In “movement prediction error” condition, viewing of the hand was limited to movement duration, in the absence of any visual target, and error signals arose solely from comparisons between predicted and actual reafferences of the hand. In order to prevent intentional corrections of errors, a subthreshold, progressive stepwise increase in prism deviation was used, so that subjects remained unaware of the visual deviation applied in both conditions. An adaptive aftereffect was observed in the “terminal feedback error” condition only. As far as subjects remained unaware of the optical deviation and self-assigned pointing errors, prediction error alone was insufficient to induce adaptation. These results indicate a critical role of hand-to-target feedback error signals in visuomotor adaptation; consistent with recent neurophysiological findings, they suggest that a combination of feedback and prediction error signals is necessary for eliciting aftereffects. They also suggest that feedback error updates the prediction of reafferences when a visual perturbation is introduced gradually and cognitive factors are eliminated or strongly attenuated.

While the mechanisms of short-term adaptation to prism-altered apparent visual direction have been widely investigated, the processes underlying adaptation to prism-altered perceived distance are less well known. This study used a hand-pointing paradigm and exposure with base-out prisms to evaluate the relative contributions of sensory (visual and proprioceptive) and motor components of adaptation to perceived-distance alteration. A main experiment was designed to elicit adaptation at the sensory and motor levels, by giving subjects altered visual feedback. A control experiment without visual feedback allowed the effects of eye muscle potentiation (EMP) induced by sustained fixation through the prisms to be uncovered. In the main experiment, the aftereffects were partitioned into two-thirds visual and one-third motor, with no significant proprioceptive component. These results differ from the classical pattern of short-term adaptation to prism-altered apparent visual direction, which includes mainly proprioceptive/motor adaptive components, with a smaller visual component. This difference can be attributed to differences in accuracy between proprioception and vision for localization in depth or in lateral directions. In addition, a comparison of the visual aftereffects in the main and control experiments revealed two sub-components with equal contributions: a recalibration of the mapping between the vergence signal and perceived distance, and an EMP-related aftereffect. These findings indicate that "visual" adaptation actually involves a multiplicity of processes.

Vertical binocular disparity is a source of distance information allowing the portrayal of the layout and 3D metrics of the visual space. The role of vertical disparity in the perception of depth, size, curvature, or slant of surfaces was revealed in several previous studies using cue conflict paradigms. In this study, we varied the configuration of stereo-cameras to investigate how changes in the horizontal and vertical disparity fields, conflicting with the vergence cue, affect perceived distance and depth. In four experiments, observers judged the distance of a cylinder displayed in front of a large fronto-parallel surface. Experiment 1 revealed that the presence of a background surface decreases the uncertainty in judgments of distance, suggesting that observers use the relative horizontal disparity between the target and the background as a cue to distance. Two other experiments showed that manipulating the pattern of vertical disparity affected both distance and depth perception. When vertical disparity specified a nearer distance than vergence (convergent cameras), perceived distance and depth were underestimated as compared with the condition where vertical disparity was congruent with vergence cues (parallel cameras). When vertical disparity specified a further distance than vergence, namely an infinite distance, distance and depth were overestimated. The removal of the vertical distortion lessened the effect on perceived distance. Overall, the results suggest that the vertical disparity introduced by the specific camera configuration is mainly responsible for the effect. These findings outline the role of vertical disparity in distance and depth perception and support the use of parallel cameras for designing stereograms.

Telestereoscopic viewing provides a method to distort egocentric distance perception by artificially increasing the interpupillary distance. Adaptation to such a visual rearrangement is little understood. Two experiments were performed in order to dissociate the effects of a sustained increased vergence demand, from those of an active calibration of the vergence/distance mapping. Egocentric distances were assessed within reaching space through open-loop pointing to small targets in the dark. During the exposure condition of the first experiment, subjects were instructed to point to the targets without feedback, whereas in the second experiment, hand visual feedback was available, resulting in a modified relationship between vergence-specified distance and reach distance. The visual component of adaptation in the second experiment was assessed on the unexposed hand. In the post-tests of both experiments, subjects exhibited a constant distance overestimation across all targets, with a more than twice larger aftereffect in the second one. These findings suggest two different processes: (1) an alteration in the vergence effort following sustained increased vergence; (2) a calibration of the vergence/distance mapping uncovering the visual component of adaptation.

When looking at objects at various distances in the physical space, the accommodation and vergence systems adjust their parameters to provide a single and clear vision of the world. Subtended muscle activity provides oculomotor cues that can contribute to the perception of depth and distance. While several studies have outlined the role of vergence in distance perception, little is known about the contribution of its concommitant accommodation component. It is possible to unravel the role of each of these physiological systems by placing observers in a situation where there is a conflict between accommodation and vergence distances. We thus sought to determine the contribution of each response system to perceived depth by simultaneously measuring vergence and accommodation while participants judged the depth of 3D stimuli. The distance conflict decreased depth constancy for stimulus displayed with negative disparity steps (divergence). Although vergence was unaffected by the stimulus distance, accommodation responses were significantly reduced when the stimulus was displayed with negative disparities. Our results show that biases in perceived depth follow undershoots in the disparity-driven accommodation response. These findings suggest that accommodation responses (i.e., from oculomotor information) can contribute to perceived depth.

Including night vision capabilities in Helmet Mounted Displays has been a serious challenge for many years. The use of "see through" head mounted image intensifiers systems is particularly challenging as it introduces some peculiar visual characteristics usually referred as "hyperstereopsis". Flight testing of such systems has started in the early nineties, both in US and Europe. While the trials conducted in US yielded quite controversial results, convergent positive ones were obtained from European testing, mainly in UK, Germany and France. Subsequently, work on integrating optically coupled I² tubes on HMD was discontinued in the US, while European manufacturers developed such HMDs for various rotary wings platforms like the TIGER. Coping with hyperstereopsis raises physiological and cognitive human factors issues. Starting in the sixties, effects of increased interocular separation and adaptation to such unusual vision conditions has been quite extensively studied by a number of authors as Wallach, Schor, Judge and Miles, Fisher and Ciuffreda. A synthetic review of literature on this subject will be presented. According to users' reports, three successive phases will be described for habituation to such devices: initial exposure, building compensation phase and behavioral adjustments phase. An habituation model will be suggested to account for HMSD users' reports and literature data bearing on hyperstereopsis, cue weighting for depth perception, adaptation and learning processes, task cognitive control. Finally, some preliminary results on hyperstereopsis spatial and temporal adaptation coming from the survey of training of TIGER pilots, currently conducted at the French-German Army Aviation Training Center, will be unveiled.