2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2188-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of egocentric distance perception under telestereoscopic viewing within reaching space

Abstract: Telestereoscopic viewing provides a method to distort egocentric distance perception by artificially increasing the interpupillary distance. Adaptation to such a visual rearrangement is little understood. Two experiments were performed in order to dissociate the effects of a sustained increased vergence demand, from those of an active calibration of the vergence/distance mapping. Egocentric distances were assessed within reaching space through open-loop pointing to small targets in the dark. During the exposur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EMPrelated aftereffects in the two experiments should be similar, as the target sequence and visual and oculomotor tasks were exactly the same. Thus, by comparing visual aftereffects in the main and control experiments, it was possible to assess the visual recalibration component (Priot, Laboissière, Sillan, Roumes, & Prablanc, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMPrelated aftereffects in the two experiments should be similar, as the target sequence and visual and oculomotor tasks were exactly the same. Thus, by comparing visual aftereffects in the main and control experiments, it was possible to assess the visual recalibration component (Priot, Laboissière, Sillan, Roumes, & Prablanc, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the efficacy of vertical disparities could be reduced at far viewing distances. This range of distances is likely to be extended in camera configurations with increased inter-axial separation, resulting in hyper-stereo viewing (Newman & Ostler, 2009; Priot, Laboissiere, Sillan, Roumes, & Prablanc, 2010; Rogers, 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional relationship between actual and estimated target distances was analyzed using a linear model (Ebenholtz 1981;Mon-Williams and Tresilian 1999;Priot et al 2010Priot et al , 2011. For each subject and each condition, the relationship between the pointing distance (dependent variable) and the actual (physical) target distance (independent variable) was fitted with a line, using a leastsquares criterion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in distance perception attributed to EMP have been reported after near (Ebenholtz and Wolfson 1975;Ebenholtz 1981) or far viewing (Ebenholtz and Wolfson 1975), after fixation through base-out (Owens and Leibowitz 1980;Ebenholtz 1981) or base-in prisms (Paap and Ebenholtz 1977), a telestereoscope (Fisher and Ciuffreda 1990;Priot et al 2010), or positive spherical lenses (Ebenholtz and Fisher 1982), all of which modify the fusional vergence demand. The sign (positive or negative) of the observed change in perceived distance was predicted by the sign of the change in fusional vergence demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%