Proceedings International Test Conference 1996. Test and Design Validity
DOI: 10.1109/test.1996.556946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using ILA testing for BIST in FPGAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Logic blocks and embedded blocks inside an FPGA are usually connected through these interconnections including programmable switches and buffers which make these separate blocks work together properly. It is rather challenging as well as necessary to test all the interconnect resources in an FPGA [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Interconnect resources include line segments and programmable interconnect points (PIPs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Logic blocks and embedded blocks inside an FPGA are usually connected through these interconnections including programmable switches and buffers which make these separate blocks work together properly. It is rather challenging as well as necessary to test all the interconnect resources in an FPGA [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Interconnect resources include line segments and programmable interconnect points (PIPs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way to detect faults in FPGA interconnections is based on iterative logic arrays (ILAs), which repeatedly reconfigures the FPGA as a group of testable ILAs [10]. In this way, test configurations can be reduced due to the regularity of the FPGA structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes separate ILAs are used to propagate errors from the logic under test [39][40] [20]. Constructing ILAs to test the RAM operation of PLBs is described in [39] [18][32] [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a lot less than that needed by any configurationindependent testing method providing equal fault coverage. Note that this method can be implemented as a self-test and compared to the self-test approach of [8] [9] it requires fewer test sessions and yet provides complete fault coverage for both the CLBs and the interconnects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%