Seven years of the Journal: a review

Brown, Frederick G.

doi:10.1002/j.2164-4918.1969.tb03316.x

Cited by 38 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The American Counseling Association's JCD and its predecessor the Personnel and Guidance Journal (P&GJ) were the subject of many studies, which examined contributor institutional affiliation (cf., Barry & Wolf, 1958;Baruth & Miller, 1977;Brown, 1969;Cesari & Pelsma, 1986;Stone & Shertzer, 1964;Walsh, Osipow, Babbs, Fredricks, & Armstrong, 1969;Weinrach, Lustig, Chan, & Thomas, 1998). No articles were identified which addressed any aspects of the editorial review process or characteristics of EBMs in JCD/P&GJ.…”

Section: Scholarly Productivity and Editorial Board Membershipmentioning

confidence: 95%

Scholarly Productivity of Editorial Board Members of Three American Counseling and Counseling Psychology Journals

Weinrach

Thomas

Pruett

et al. 2006

Int J Adv Counselling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The scholarly journals in professional and scientific fields serve the function of communicating new knowledge and informed discourse on the major issues affecting the field of counseling, and editorial board members (EBMs) serve as gatekeepers of what information will be communicated. The ability of EBMs to make sound judgments directly affects the quality of research and scholarship published. This study analyzed one important EBM qualification, the scholarly productivity of the editorial board members of three major American counseling journals (The Counseling Psychologist [TCP], the Journal of Counseling Psychology [JCP], and the Journal of Counseling and Development [JCD]). An analysis of the productivity rates of editorial board members on these journals was conducted using the PsycINFO database. The results indicated that editorial board members of JCP have significantly more experience publishing than members of TCP and JCD. The differential publication rates of editorial board members suggest that these three journals place different emphasis on scholarly productivity as part of their selection criteria for editorial board membership and may reflect that the three journals have different missions and serve different clientele. These findings have implications, not only for the profession 1 This article is dedicated to our esteemed colleague, Stephen G. Weinrach, who died after a long and courageous battle with leukemia on April 24, 2004. This article was the last that Steve was working on prior to his death. It was his brainchild. The contributions that Steve made to the counseling profession over the years are inestimable. He was truly through his numerous writings and professional association activities the "conscience of the couseling profession." He is dearly missed.

show abstract

Section: Scholarly Productivity and Editorial Board Membershipmentioning

confidence: 95%

Scholarly Productivity of Editorial Board Members of Three American Counseling and Counseling Psychology Journals

Weinrach

Thomas

Pruett

et al. 2006

Int J Adv Counselling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although earlier studies examined the Journal for a specified number of years (e.g., Brown, 1969;Stone & Shertzer, 1964), it was decided that grouping by editorship would provide a means of comparison indicating the editor's contribution to the Journal and to the profession in turn.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Content Analysis of the Journal of Counseling and Development: Volumes 48–66

Pelsma

Cesari

1989

Jour of Counseling & Develop

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A content analysis of the Journal of Counseling and Development was conducted for a 19‐year period (Vols. 48–66). Articles were cross‐classified under content headings and then grouped by the four editorship periods during this time (e.g., Goldman, 1969–1975; Sue, 1975–1978; Barclay, 1978–1984; Goodyear, 1984–1988). Results were compared to earlier studies to illustrate changes and trends in both the counseling professions and the Journal.

show abstract

“…I reiterate Brown's (1969) remark that our field must "take a look at itself-where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going" (p. 263).…”

Section: Identity Of Counseling Psychologymentioning

confidence: 85%

Calls for Multiple Indices Incorporating Multiculturalism in Content Analysis

Lee

2005

The Counseling Psychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This reaction evaluates three content analyses that investigated separate aspects of research articles published in major counseling psychology journals: (a) institutional research productivity, (b) use of structural equation modeling, and (c) use of theorydriven research. The evaluation focuses on the adequacy of indices used in the content analyses and implications as well as cautions in interpreting the findings. Recommendations are provided with an emphasis on multiculturalism and diversity, the core values of the field of counseling psychology.

show abstract

Seven years of the Journal: a review

Cited by 38 publications

References 8 publications

Scholarly Productivity of Editorial Board Members of Three American Counseling and Counseling Psychology Journals

Scholarly Productivity of Editorial Board Members of Three American Counseling and Counseling Psychology Journals

Content Analysis of the Journal of Counseling and Development: Volumes 48–66

Calls for Multiple Indices Incorporating Multiculturalism in Content Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About