Reflexives in the lexical and grammatical system of language and artistic discourse: linguocultural contrastive aspect

Abstract

The article is devoted to reflexives in the lexico-grammatical system of the language and artistic discourse in the linguocultural contrastive aspect. The problem of establishing the lexico-grammatical nature of reflexives remains relevant in modern linguistics, since the language system in different linguistic cultures lives according to its linguistic laws. The novelty of the study lies in determining the fact that the level status of reflexives is various in different languages. It has been established that the lexical and grammatical categories of reflexive pronouns are contradictory and unstable, presented not only in different languages, but also in grammatical studies of different authors within the same language. In some studies, the reflexive forms a category consisting of one unit, in others – several units and in some studies, they are considered as personal pronouns. In some languages, the reflexive of verbs is described along with active and passive forms as a grammeme of the grammatical category of voice, in others they have a double-level status. As a result of structural, lexico-grammatical analysis, comparative analysis, interpretative analysis of the actual material (artistic discourse), subject-predicate-object relations in verbs defined as reflexive were revealed. The perspective is the consideration of the discursive nature of reflexives in various types of discourse in different linguistic cultures.

Linguistic and cultural specifics of the formation of the diplomatic terminology system

“…Discourse studies are based on works that explore different types of discourse (media discourse, PR discourse, political discourse, advertising discourse, legal discourse, educational discourse, theatrical discourse, etc.) related to diplomatic discourse in linguocultures (Wood & Serres, 1970;Cohen, 1991;Hunt, 1992;Blum &Molotkova, 2004;Baker, 2015;Popova et al, 2018;Repina et al, 2018;Baranova et al 2020;Lynch, Salikhova, and Eremeeva, 2020;Boeva-Оmelechko et al, 2020;Ibragimov, 2021;Khodyreva et al, 2021;Khairutdinova et al, 2022;Masalimova et al, 2022;Muryasov, Zheltukhina & Zelenskaya, 2022;Sekyere-Asiedu et al, 2022;Tameryan et al, 2019;Tameryan, Zyubina & Zheltukhina, 2022;Zheltukhina, Zelenskaya & Ponomarenko, 2020;Zheltukhina et al, 2016;2017a;2017b;2021). Public-diplomatic discourse is a social and communicative act, public consciousness and status-role norms that perform the functions of positioning, transmission, and consolidation.…”