2002
DOI: 10.1145/513918.514061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False-path-aware statistical timing analysis and efficient path selection for delay testing and timing validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two approaches to static timing analysis: path-based [9][10][11][12][13][14] and block- -20]. The path-based approach can be regarded as a depth-first search, and it employs a given a set of critical paths.…”
Section: A Timing Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two approaches to static timing analysis: path-based [9][10][11][12][13][14] and block- -20]. The path-based approach can be regarded as a depth-first search, and it employs a given a set of critical paths.…”
Section: A Timing Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these variations are increasing with each new generation of technology. Statistical Static Timing Analysis (SSTA) has been proposed to perform full-chip analysis of timing under such types of uncertainty, and has been the subject of intense research recently [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The result of SSTA is the prediction of parametric yield at a given target performance for a design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the shrinking feature size in VLSI technology, the impact of process variation is increasingly felt. To address the effect, great amount of research has been done recently, such as the clock skew analysis under process variation [4][5][6][7][8][9][10], statistical performance analysis [9,10], worst case performance analysis [11,12], parametric yield estimation [12,13], impact analysis on micro architecture [12,13] and delay fault [14,15] test under process variation [14][15][16][17]. As the technology reaches deep submicron or nanometer regime, the errors due to process variations becomes prominent [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%