1982
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(82)90050-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the presence of an inversion layer in an MPN structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical background.--Modified barrier heights due to shallow surface doping have been examined theoretically in considerable detail (9,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) since the early 1970's. Various levels of approximation of carrier effects have been considered, including (i) the depletion approximation (9,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), (ii) a limited inversion approximation that accounted for minority free-carriers outside the p* region (26), and (iii) numerical calculations, including both electron and hole free-carriers throughout the device structure (present work). In addition to approximations for the free-carrier densities, the effects associated with nonplanar doping profiles in the shallow p" layer have been considered by a number of authors (19,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theoretical background.--Modified barrier heights due to shallow surface doping have been examined theoretically in considerable detail (9,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) since the early 1970's. Various levels of approximation of carrier effects have been considered, including (i) the depletion approximation (9,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), (ii) a limited inversion approximation that accounted for minority free-carriers outside the p* region (26), and (iii) numerical calculations, including both electron and hole free-carriers throughout the device structure (present work). In addition to approximations for the free-carrier densities, the effects associated with nonplanar doping profiles in the shallow p" layer have been considered by a number of authors (19,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(This expression is written where the p*-n boundary occurs at x = t, rather than at x = 0 as in Ref. (26)). In the inversion formulation, one no longer has a simple analytical expression for the maximum Xm in the potential; rather, one has to solve two coupled equations to' obtain Xm.…”
Section: Depletion Approximation--lubberts Et Al (19) Solvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barrier Height of Au/p-InP/n-Ino. 5 By incorporating a very shallow p layer, the enhancement of the barrier height is evident. With a 300-A-thick p layer, the barrier height was increased to 0.42 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although Sehottky barriers on most covalent semiconductors are relatively insensitive to changes in the metal workfunction, it has been known since the early 1970's that surface-doped barriers in either a metal-p+-n (MPN) or metalm*-p (MNP) configuration can be employed to enhance barrier heights. A number of theoretical papers have appeared treating both narrow (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) and extended (7)(8)(9) surface-doped regions. With the exception of Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of Ref. (5), these papers have treated the surface-doped zone as fully depleted. For large barrier heights, minority carriers will collect in the vicinity of the potential hump and eventually affect saturation of the barrier height.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%