The local electric field in a p-n junction crucially impacts the reverse ͑leakage͒ current that determines basic parameters of semiconductor devices and integrated circuits. The field importance and magnitude are investigated by a method based on the analysis of the leakage-current activation-energy (E a ) and its dependence on junction bias (V R ), especially on experimental occurrence of the dE a /dV R minimum. It is illustrated for silicided shallow junctions, which exhibit together with the generation current also a local Schottky effect due to small-area silicide penetrations. The method may also be used for different materials and current origins.One of the concerns in various technologies is the p-n junction reverse ͑leakage͒ current (I R ). Because of a drain-junction leakage current, I R strongly impacts the off-state leakage and power consumption in scaled ultralarge scale integrated ͑ULSI͒ technologies and especially the retention time of dynamic random access memories ͑DRAMs͒, 1 and determines the noise and overall quality of complementary metal oxide semiconductor ͑CMOS͒ image sensors. 2 For that purpose, a good insight in the leakage current mechanisms is essential. In scaled technologies, the peripheral or surface component, where the depletion region reaches the Si-SiO 2 interface is the dominant component. [1][2][3][4] The increase of the doping concentration in the substrate regions is another scaling trend, which at the same time enhances the maximum electric field (F d ) due to ionized impurities. This favors field-enhanced carrier generation mechanisms, like the Poole-Frenkel ͑P-F͒ effect, trap-assisted tunneling ͑TAT͒, band-toband tunneling ͑BBT͒, and impact ionization, which should be accounted for when analyzing or modeling the junction leakage current. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The maximum field is usually attributed to F d ϭ 2(V bi ϩ V R )/W d ϳ (V bi ϩ V R ) 1/2 for a planar junction, where V bi is the built-in potential and W d is the depletion width that depends on the reverse bias V R . However, when considering the peripheral leakage current, due to junction edges and corners, which mostly determines the leakage current of state-of-the-art small-size junctions, 3,4 one should rather use expressions for a curved junction. 10 These expressions, oppositely to the case of a planar junction, yield in good approximation a linear dependence between F d and V R ϩ V bi .However, it is generally impossible to explain the leakage current by the identification of the maximum electric field F d due to impurity ionization only. 11 Especially, when extended defects are present, the local ͑real͒ field (F LOC ) experienced in their vicinity by generation-recombination ͑G-R͒ centers is significantly higher, 8 whereby F LOC ϭ F d . The field enhancement factor is especially high for needlelike conductive protrusions in the junction. 12 For samples with the same number and type of G-R centers, a higher leakage current occurs at larger F LOC . It explains the large efforts for manufacturing devices with a l...