2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352007000400032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Produtividade e valor nutritivo da Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu em um sistema silvipastoril

Abstract: Produtividade e valor nutritivo da

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
20
1
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
20
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of dry matter was higher in the assessed heights in the monoculture system compared to the system intercropped with Babassu, similar only at 40 cm height, which in both systems did not differ statistically for dry matter percentage (Figure 4). The same was reported by Souza et al (2007) who found that shading significantly affected the dry matter content of forage due to a higher proportion of leaves and a higher ratio of living:dead material on grass. According to Gobbi et al (2011), another factor that reduces dry matter content of the grass in the shaded system is leaf anatomy modification because the increased specific leaf area leads to a decrease in the forage mass density and reduces sclerenchymatous tissue and the thickness of the palisade parenchyma.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The percentage of dry matter was higher in the assessed heights in the monoculture system compared to the system intercropped with Babassu, similar only at 40 cm height, which in both systems did not differ statistically for dry matter percentage (Figure 4). The same was reported by Souza et al (2007) who found that shading significantly affected the dry matter content of forage due to a higher proportion of leaves and a higher ratio of living:dead material on grass. According to Gobbi et al (2011), another factor that reduces dry matter content of the grass in the shaded system is leaf anatomy modification because the increased specific leaf area leads to a decrease in the forage mass density and reduces sclerenchymatous tissue and the thickness of the palisade parenchyma.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Such effect is common when comparing grasses grown under direct sunlight and plants Silveira Júnior, O. et al under systems with light restriction, wherein the higher forage mass produced under direct sunlight provides a lower concentration of N in the plants. However, a similar accumulation of N is verified in both systems (SOARES et al, 2009;SOUZA et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…and Panicum spp. genuses) and tropical legumes (Arachis, Pueraria and Stylozanthes) (Paciullo et al, 2007;Sousa et al, 2007;Soares et al, 2009;Gobbi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%