2016
DOI: 10.1590/1809-2950/14396823022016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confiabilidade do Sistema de Classificação da Função Motora Grossa Ampliado e Revisto (GMFCS E & R) entre estudantes e profissionais de saúde no Brasil

Abstract: Reliability of the Gross Motor Function Classification System Expanded and Revised (GMFCS E & R) among students and health professionals in BrazilRESUMEN | En la clasificación de la función motora gruesa de niños con parálisis cerebral (PC), el Gross Motor Function viene siendo fiable, sin embargo la versión brasileña todavía sigue siendo poco aplicada, en especial por distintos profesionales y estudiantes de grado en el área de la salud. El propósito de este artículo es el de evaluar la fiabilidad de esta ver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross-cultural adaptation of the GMFCS for Brazil has been performed ( 14 - 15 ) , with this instrument allowing the measurement of the level of ability to perform gross motor activities in people with cerebral palsy. The patient classified as level I can walk, run and jump, but with impairments in speed, coordination and balance; level II patients can walk and have minimal ability to run and jump; level III patients can only walk with assistive mobility devices; in level IV independent mobility is very limited; and in level V all motor functions are severely limited ( 15 ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-cultural adaptation of the GMFCS for Brazil has been performed ( 14 - 15 ) , with this instrument allowing the measurement of the level of ability to perform gross motor activities in people with cerebral palsy. The patient classified as level I can walk, run and jump, but with impairments in speed, coordination and balance; level II patients can walk and have minimal ability to run and jump; level III patients can only walk with assistive mobility devices; in level IV independent mobility is very limited; and in level V all motor functions are severely limited ( 15 ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GMFCS – E&R, which was also cross-culturally adapted for Brazilian population (Silva, Pfeifer, & Funayama, 2010b), classified the functional mobility of children with CP into five levels: I, walks without limitations; II, walks with limitations; III, walks using a manual device mobility; IV, auto-mobility with limitations; and V, transported in a manual wheelchair. The MACS, which was also cross-culturally adapted version for Brazil (Silva, Pfeifer, & Funayama, 2010a), classified the manual function of children with CP to five levels: I, manipulates objects with success; II, manipulates most objects with reduced quality or speed; III, manipulates objects with difficulty; IV, manipulates a variety of easily usable objects; and V, does not manipulate objects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). This instrument underwent cross-cultural validation for Brazil (Silva, Dias, & Pfeifer, 2016). It evaluates the children in five levels (I, II, III, IV and V) according to the age, considering what they manage to accomplish regarding the gross motor function, especially the functions of sitting (control of the trunk) and walking.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%