The aim of the study was to investigate the physician and nursing perceptions regarding communication and collaboration as well as the factors that may influence these activities. A self-administered questionnaire survey was sent to a random sample of 93 physicians and 197 nurses based in two large public hospitals in Athens, Greece. Descriptive statistics, t-test and chi square test were performed with the SPSS 19.0 statistical package. Years of experience, the size of the clinic, the university degree and the postgraduate studies were found to be significant factors according to nurses' view (p < 0.05). For the physicians, age, sex, years of experience and the size of clinic affected the communication and collaboration with the nursing staff significantly (p < 0.05). In summary, these findings suggest that nurses and physicians do not share the same views concerning the effectiveness of their communication and nurses' role in the decision-making process of the patients' care. The most important barrier for the establishment of good relations between these professions, according to the physicians, was that they did not recognize the nurses' professional role. The study also indicated that the absence of interprofessional collaboration may result in a higher possibility of errors and omissions in patients' care. Therefore, in everyday practice, both nurses and physicians should acknowledge the importance of their effective communication and they should develop and implement interprofessional teamwork interventions to improve collaboration. Moreover, nurses have to constantly consolidate their role in the decision process and patients' care, especially in countries with limited interprofessional collaboration culture. In addition, factors that improve physicians' attitudes toward collaboration and effective communication should be further explored.
Aim: To explore parents' satisfaction concerning their child's care during hospitalization and its determinants. Methods: A descriptive, non-experimental correlational design was used. The data collection was based on interviews using a 63 item questionnaire, the Swedish Pyramid Questionnaire. The parents of 206 children (hospitalized in two pediatric and two surgical units) participated in the study. Results: The independent t-test results demonstrated that the parents showed greater satisfaction with staff attitudes and medical treatment, whereas they were less satisfied with the information concerning routines and the staff work environment. The stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that adequacy of care, adequate pain management, parents' involvement in care, a trusting relationship, and staff attitudes were the most important determinants of parental satisfaction. Conclusion: Interventions in pediatric care should include measurements of parental and child satisfaction as a tool to assess the quality of care.
The purpose of this study was to describe specific work-related factors that contribute to increased levels of stress experienced by nursing personnel, and to compare their impact on nurses and assistant nurses who work in Dialysis Units (DU) to those who work in Peritoneal Dialysis Units (PDU) in Greece. The sample of the study consisted of 682 members of nursing personnel working in DU and in PDU in Greek Hospitals. The collection of data was done by means of a questionnaire. The latter included questions about the motivation of nursing personnel for having chosen to work in these units along with questions about the stress factors related to the patients and their care, the role of the nurse in the unit, and the working conditions. According to the results of the study, the percentage of nursing personnel working in DU or PDU by their own choice was 71% and 8.3% respectively, whereas the rest of the staff were placed there irrespective of their preferences, by the Administrators. Among nursing personnel who had chosen to work in DU, the reported motives that contributed to their decision were the absence of a night shift (27.8%), and working in a closed unit. The main motive that incited nursing personnel to work in PDU was the acquisition and the application of specialized knowledge. The percentage of nursing personnel working in DU that expected high levels of job satisfaction was 77%, whereas the corresponding percentage for nursing personnel working in PDU was 65%. However, only 44% and 37% of the nursing personnel working in DU and PDU reported high levels of job satisfaction. The most important stressors related: i) To the patient: were the risk of contamination (79% DU, 84% PDU) and the death of a patient (77% DU, 80% PDU). 2) To the role of nursing personnel in the unit: were increased responsibilities (65% DU, 37% PDU), low involvement of the nursing personnel in decision making (58% DU, 54% PDU), and low professional status of nursing personnel. 3) To the working conditions: were the shortage of nursing personnel (74% DU, 99% PDU), limited material (74% DU, 57% PDU), the closed environment (75% DU, 64% PDU) and the daily work routine (78% DU, 61% PDU). In conclusion, we can say that working in DU and PDU provokes increased stress in nursing personnel, even though the implicated stress factors differ between these units.
Carefully designed curricula can influence the attitudes of nursing students towards children with disabilities. Special courses for treating disabled children should be integrated to the basic nursing studies. Moreover, continuing hospital education can change paediatric nurses' attitudes towards children with disabilities.
Our study illustrated that parents overestimate HRQoL of their children with asthma even though moderate agreement between child self-reports and parent proxy-reports on HRQoL was noticed. Fathers seem to be better proxy-reporters than mothers. Any evaluation of current approaches to measuring children's HRQoL needs to allow both parent and child to give their own perspective.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.