The strain Enterncoccus faeciurn T I 36 produces two bacteriocins, enterocin A, a member of the pediocin family of bacteriocins, and a new bacteriocin termed enterocin B. The N-terminal amino acid sequences of enterocins A and B were determined, and the gene encoding enterocin B was sequenced. The primary translation product was a 71 aa peptide containing a leader peptide of the double-glycine type which is cleaved off to give mature enterocin B of 53 aa. Enterocin B does not belong to the pediocin family of bacteriocins and shows strong homology to carnobacteriocin A. However, sequence similarities in their leader peptides and C-termini suggest that enterocin B and carnobacteriocin A are related to bacteriocins of the pediocin family. Enterocins A and B had only slightly different inhibitory spectra, and both were active against a wide range of Gram-positive bacteria, including listeriae, staphylococci and most lactic acid bacteria tested. Both had bactericidal activities, but survival at a frequency of 10-4-10-2 was observed when sensitive cultures were exposed to either bacteriocin. The number of survivors was drastically reduced when a mixture of the two bacteriocins was added to the cells.
A novel antimicrobial protein, designated enterolysin A, was purified from an Enterococcus faecalis LMG 2333 culture. Enterolysin A inhibits growth of selected enterococci, pediococci, lactococci, and lactobacilli. Antimicrobial activity was initially detected only on solid media, but by growing the bacteria in a fermentor under optimized production conditions (MRS broth with 4% [wt/vol] glucose, pH 6.5, and a temperature between 25 and 35°C), the bacteriocin activity was increased to 5,120 bacteriocin units ml ؊1 . Enterolysin A production was regulated by pH, and activity was first detected in the transition between the logarithmic and stationary growth phases. Killing of sensitive bacteria by enterolysin A showed a dose-response behavior, and the bacteriocin has a bacteriolytic mode of action. Enterolysin A was purified, and the primary structure was determined by combined amino acid and DNA sequencing. This bacteriocin is translated as a 343-amino-acid preprotein with an sec-dependent signal peptide of 27 amino acids, which is followed by a sequence corresponding to the N-terminal part of the purified protein. Mature enterolysin A consists of 316 amino acids and has a calculated molecular weight of 34,501, and the theoretical pI is 9.24. The N terminus of enterolysin A is homologous to the catalytic domains of different cell wall-degrading proteins with modular structures. These include lysostaphin, ALE-1, zoocin A, and LytM, which are all endopeptidases belonging to the M37 protease family. The N-terminal part of enterolysin A is linked by a threonine-proline-rich region to a putative C-terminal recognition domain, which shows significant sequence identity to two bacteriophage lysins.Bacteriocins are antimicrobial peptides or proteins that inhibit growth of bacteria closely related to the producing organism. Antimicrobial compounds from archaea and gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria have been characterized, and especially bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have received a great deal of attention due to their preservative effects in food systems. Members of most LAB genera, including lactobacilli, lactococci, pediococci, leuconostocs, carnobacteria, streptococci, and enterococci, produce bacteriocins. Almost all bacteriocins characterized so far have been purified from culture supernatants, and the amino acid sequences have been obtained and used for reverse genetic studies. However, in many strains bacteriocin production can only be detected on solid media, which has made biochemical and genetic characterization difficult (3,12,32). This suggests that bacteriocin production is regulated in these strains, and information about regulation of bacteriocin production is vital for obtaining more knowledge about these antimicrobial compounds. This is especially important from an applied point of view if a bacteriocin is to be produced on a large scale.Bacteriocins from LAB are currently classified into three different major classes (33). Class I bacteriocins, the lantibiotics, are small peptides that...
Regulation of the subcellular localization of certain proteins is a mechanism for the regulation of their biological activities. FGF-2 can be produced as distinct isoforms by alternative initiation of translation on a single mRNA and the isoforms are differently sorted in cells. High molecular weight FGF-2 isoforms are not secreted from the cell, but are transported to the nucleus where they regulate cell growth or behavior in an intracrine fashion. 18 kDa FGF-2 can be secreted to the extracellular medium where it acts as a conventional growth factor by binding to and activation of cell-surface receptors. Furthermore, following receptor-mediated endocytosis, the exogenous FGF-2 can be transported to the nuclei of target cells, and this is of importance for the transmittance of a mitogenic signal. The growth factor is able to interact with several intracellular proteins. Here, the mode of action and biological role of intracellular FGF-2 are discussed.
Production of the bacteriocins enterocin A and enterocin B inEnterococcus faecium CTC492 was dependent on the presence of an extracellular peptide produced by the strain itself. This induction factor (EntF) was purified, and amino acid sequencing combined with DNA sequencing of the corresponding gene identified it as a peptide of 25 amino acids. The gene encodes a prepeptide of 41 amino acids, including a 16-amino-acid leader peptide of the double-glycine type. Environmental factors influenced the level of bacteriocin production in E. faecium CTC492. The optimal pH for bacteriocin production was 6.2. At pH 5.5, growth was slow, and very little bacteriocin was formed. The presence of NaCl or ethanol (EtOH) was also inhibitory to bacteriocin production, and at high concentrations of these solutes, no bacteriocin production was observed. The induction factor induced its own synthesis, and by dilution of the culture 106 times or more, nonproducing cultures were obtained. Bacteriocin production was induced in these cultures by addition of EntF. The response was linear, and low bacteriocin production could be induced by about 10−17 M EntF. This response was attenuated by low pH or the presence of high concentrations of NaCl or EtOH, and 300 times more EntF was needed to induce detectable bacteriocin production in the presence of 6.5% NaCl. High levels of bacteriocin production in cultures grown at low pH or in the presence of high concentrations of NaCl or EtOH were obtained by addition of sufficient amounts of EntF.
Fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1), which stimulates cell growth, differentiation, and migration, is capable of crossing cellular membranes to reach the cytosol and the nucleus in cells containing specific FGF receptors. The cell entry process can be monitored by phosphorylation of the translocated FGF-1. We present evidence that phosphorylation of FGF-1 occurs in the nucleus by protein kinase C (PKC)␦. The phosphorylated FGF-1 is subsequently exported to the cytosol. A mutant growth factor where serine at the phosphorylation site is exchanged with glutamic acid, to mimic phosphorylated FGF-1, is constitutively transported to the cytosol, whereas a mutant containing alanine at this site remains in the nucleus. The export can be blocked by leptomycin B, indicating active and receptor-mediated nuclear export of FGF-1. Thapsigargin, but not leptomycin B, prevents the appearance of active PKC␦ in the nucleus, and FGF-1 is in this case phosphorylated in the cytosol. Leptomycin B increases the amount of phosphorylated FGF-1 in the cells by preventing dephosphorylation of the growth factor, which seems to occur more rapidly in the cytoplasm than in the nucleus. The nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of the phosphorylated growth factor is likely to play a role in the activity of internalized FGF-1.
Exogenous fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) signals through activation of transmembrane FGF receptors (FGFRs) but may also regulate cellular processes after translocation to the cytosol and nucleus of target cells. Translocation of FGF1 occurs across the limiting membrane of intracellular vesicles and is a regulated process that depends on the C-terminal tail of the FGFR. Here, we report that translocation of FGF1 requires activity of the ␣ isoform of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). FGF1 translocation was inhibited after chemical inhibition of p38 MAPK or after small interfering RNA knockdown of p38␣. Translocation was increased after stimulation of p38 MAPK with anisomycin, mannitol, or H 2 O 2 . The activity level of p38 MAPK was not found to affect endocytosis or intracellular sorting of FGF1/FGFR1. Instead, we found that p38 MAPK regulates FGF1 translocation by phosphorylation of FGFR1 at Ser777. The FGFR1 mutation S777A abolished FGF1 translocation, while phospho-mimetic mutations of Ser777 to Asp or Glu allowed translocation to take place and bypassed the requirement for active p38 MAPK. Ser777 in FGFR1 was directly phosphorylated by p38␣ in a cell-free system. These data demonstrate a crucial role for p38␣ MAPK in the regulated translocation of exogenous FGF1 into the cytosol/nucleus, and they reveal a specific role for p38␣ MAPK-mediated serine phosphorylation of FGFR1.Fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) belongs to a family of heparin binding polypeptide growth factors encoded by 22 genes in mice and humans (20). Most FGFs transmit signals to cells by binding and through activation of a family of highaffinity, tyrosine kinase FGF receptors (FGFR1 to -4) (7). FGF1 and FGF2 may, in addition, be translocated from the extracellular space into the cytosol and nucleus of target cells (37,39,46,58). Translocated FGF1 and FGF2, in particular nuclear FGF1 and FGF2, have been reported to be involved in regulating processes such as rRNA synthesis and cell growth (17-19, 21, 36, 44, 45, 52, 54, 56, 61).The translocation of exogenous FGF1 or FGF2 into the cytosol and nucleus is a highly regulated process that requires phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) activity (23) and active hsp90 (52) and is strictly dependent on binding of FGF to either FGFR1 or FGFR4 (47). Furthermore, translocation was found to be cell cycle dependent (3, 31, 63), it can be stimulated by serum deprivation of cells (1,3,18,25,31,32,55,63), and it occurs after a several-hour delay compared to the endocytic uptake of FGF (31, 47). The nuclear trafficking of FGF1 is also tightly regulated by two nuclear localization sequences (19, 51), a nuclear export sequence (36), and by phosphorylation of FGF1 at Ser130 by protein kinase C␦ (PKC␦) (57).The actual translocation of FGF across cellular membranes appears to occur in early endosomes, as it was found to depend on the electrical potential across vesicular membranes (31, 32). Extensive unfolding of the growth factor is not required for the translocation to occur (53). It is not known exact...
SummaryCertain mutants in Escherichia coli lacking multiple penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) produce misshapen cells containing kinks, bends and branches. These deformed regions exhibit two structural characteristics of normal cell poles: the peptidoglycan is inert to dilution by new synthesis or turnover, and a similarly stable patch of outer membrane caps the sites. To test the premise that these aberrant sites represent biochemically functional but misplaced cell poles, we assessed the intracellular distribution of proteins that localize specifically to bacterial poles. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) hybrids containing polar localization sequences from the Shigella flexneri IcsA protein or from the Vibrio cholerae EpsM protein formed foci at the poles of wild-type E. coli and at the poles and morphological abnormalities in PBP mutants. In addition, secreted wild-type IcsA localized to the outer membrane overlying these aberrant domains. We conclude that the morphologically deformed sites in these mutants represent fully functional poles or pole fragments. The results suggest that prokaryotic morphology is driven, at least in part, by the controlled placement of polar material, and that one or more of the low-molecular-weight PBPs participate in this process. Such mutants may help to unravel how particular proteins are targeted to bacterial poles, thereby creating important biochemical and functional asymmetries.
The IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) regulate the mitogenic effects of IGFs in the extracellular environment. Several members of this family, including IGFBP-3, also appear to have IGF-independent effects on cell function. For IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5, both of which are translocated to the cell nuclei, these effects may be related to their putative nuclear actions. Because reversible phosphorylation is an important mechanism for controlling nuclear protein import, we have examined the effect of phosphorylating IGFBP-3 with a number of serine/threonine protein kinases on its nuclear import. Phosphorylation of IGFBP-3 by the double-stranded DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) increased both the nuclear import of IGFBP-3 and the binding of IGFBP-3 to components within the nucleus compared with nonphosphorylated IGFBP-3. However, there was no difference in the binding of the nuclear transport factor, importin beta, to nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated IGFBP-3. The ability of the DNA-PK phosphoform of IGFBP-3 to bind IGFs was severely attenuated, and in contrast to nonphosphorylated IGFBP-3, the DNA-PK phosphoform was unable to transport IGF-I to the nucleus. Furthermore, IGFBP-3 was phosphorylated by DNA-PK when complexed to IGF-I causing the phosphoform to release IGF-I. Together, these results suggest that when IGF-I is cotransported into the nucleus by IGFBP-3, phosphorylation of IGFBP-3 by nuclear DNA-PK provides a means for releasing bound IGF-I and creating a phosphoform of IGFBP-3 with increased affinity for nuclear components.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.