The progression toward shorter steps and slower walking and increased step width and prolonged double support in older adult, may therefore emerge as a compensatory strategy aimed at increasing stability, avoiding falls, or reducing the energetic cost of mobility.
Objectives: Mechanical orthoses, such as the hip knee ankle foot orthosis (HKAFO) and the isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis (IRGO), are both used for walking in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the energy expenditure during walking with these orthoses compared with a powered gait orthosis (PGO) in patients with SCI. Methods: Five patients with SCI who were experienced users of HKAFOs participated in this study. Subjects were also fitted with an IRGO and PGO and underwent a specific gait training program. Patients walked along a flat walkway using the three types of orthosis at their self-selected walking speed. A stop watch and a polar heart rate monitor were used to measure the speed of walking and heart rate. Results: Walking speed, the distance walked and the physiological cost index (PCI) all improved with both the new PGO and the IRGO as compared with the HKAFO. Conclusions: A PGO can improve walking speed and the distance walked and reduce the PCI of walking as compared with mechanical orthoses, probably due to the activated movements of the lower limb joints.
In comparing two splints, paIn was the only significantly different parameter between tested parameters; with the custom-made splints demonstrating better results In paIn reduction.
Loss of balance is an important factor in increasing the risk of falling in older subjects. Foot orthoses can improve functional measures of stability in older adults. In this review, results from studies suggest a number of recommendations regarding the optimal footwear for older people to reduce the risk of falling.
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the Physiological Cost Index of walking with a reciprocating gait orthosis to that of walking with bilateral knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs) by subjects with paraplegia resulting from T 12 -L 1 spinal cord lesions. Methodology: Six chronic paraplegic subjects who had T 12 -L 1 spinal cord lesions and who previously wore bilateral KAFOs were recruited. Each subject was fitted with an isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis (IRGO) and received a standardized training program. Subjects were then asked to walk using the two orthotic devices along a 40 m rectangular pathway at a speed that was comfortable for them. The walking speed was measured using a stop watch, and a Polar Heart Rate Monitor was used to measure the heart rate of the subjects. The Physiological Cost Index (PCI) was calculated for comparison. Results: Ambulation using the IRGO (10.46 þ/7 2.00 m/min) was significantly faster (p ¼ 0.009) than ambulation using the bilateral KAFOs (5.51 þ/7 4.30 m/min). The PCI demonstrated when walking with the IRGO (2.85 þ/7 0.77 beats/m) was significantly lower (p ¼ 0.0306) than that of the bilateral KAFOs (6.77 þ/7 3.28 beats/m). Conclusion: Paraplegic patients with T 12 -L 1 spinal cord lesions walk faster and more efficiently using the isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis as compared to using the bilateral KAFOs.
Both orthoses reduced knee pain. Maximum knee range of motion was increased by both interventions although it was 3 degrees less when wearing the knee orthosis. Clinical relevance Both orthoses reduce pain and improve gait anomalies in medial compartment knee OA. Our results suggest a laterally wedged insole can be an alternative conservative approach to unloader knee orthosis for treating symptoms of medial compartment knee OA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.