Objectives: Mechanical orthoses, such as the hip knee ankle foot orthosis (HKAFO) and the isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis (IRGO), are both used for walking in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the energy expenditure during walking with these orthoses compared with a powered gait orthosis (PGO) in patients with SCI. Methods: Five patients with SCI who were experienced users of HKAFOs participated in this study. Subjects were also fitted with an IRGO and PGO and underwent a specific gait training program. Patients walked along a flat walkway using the three types of orthosis at their self-selected walking speed. A stop watch and a polar heart rate monitor were used to measure the speed of walking and heart rate. Results: Walking speed, the distance walked and the physiological cost index (PCI) all improved with both the new PGO and the IRGO as compared with the HKAFO. Conclusions: A PGO can improve walking speed and the distance walked and reduce the PCI of walking as compared with mechanical orthoses, probably due to the activated movements of the lower limb joints.
For children with CP, use of specific types of AFOs improved gait parameters, including ankle and knee range of motion, walking speed and stride length. AFOs reduced energy expenditure in children with spastic CP. However, further studies with good PEDro scores are required for more conclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of AFOs in children with CP.
In comparing two splints, paIn was the only significantly different parameter between tested parameters; with the custom-made splints demonstrating better results In paIn reduction.
Both orthoses reduced knee pain. Maximum knee range of motion was increased by both interventions although it was 3 degrees less when wearing the knee orthosis. Clinical relevance Both orthoses reduce pain and improve gait anomalies in medial compartment knee OA. Our results suggest a laterally wedged insole can be an alternative conservative approach to unloader knee orthosis for treating symptoms of medial compartment knee OA.
The changes offered by PGOs are not substantial enough for such orthoses to be currently considered preferable by SCI subjects for ambulatory purposes. Clinical relevance The development of powered orthoses is still in its infancy and progress needs to be made to improve their functionality and performance envelopes.
Background: The aim of this case study was to analyze the effect on gait parameters of a new design of powered gait orthosis which applied synchronized motions to both the hip and knee joints when utilized for walking by a spinal cord injury (SCI) patient.Case Description and Methods: Two orthoses were evaluated while worn by an incomplete SCI subject. Gait evaluation was performed when walking with an isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis (IRGO) and compared to that demonstrated by a newly developed powered version. This new orthosis was based on the IRGO superstructure but incorporated powered hip and knee joints using electrically motorized actuators.Findings and Outcomes: These gait parameters were improved when compared to standard IRGO and initial testing with the orthosis with only the hip or the knee joints activated in isolation. Maximum hip flexion and extension angles, as well as the maximum knee flexion and extension angles all increased when walking with the powered RGO compared to the IRGO.Conclusions: Gait evaluation of this newly developed orthosis showed improvement in measured parameters when compared to walking with an IRGO.Clinical relevanceThis case study gave the authors confidence to extend the research to a more extensive study with a group of SCI patients.
Background:The aim of this case study was to identify the effect of a powered hip orthosis on the kinematics and temporal-spatial parameters of walking by a patient with spinal cord injury (SCI). Case Description and Methods: Two orthoses were evaluated while worn by an incomplete SCI subject with a T-8level of injury. Gait evaluation was performed when walking with an Isocentric Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (IRGO) and compared to that demonstrated by a newly powered version of the orthosis; based on the IRGO superstructure but incorporating powered hip joints using an electrically motorized actuator that produced active hip joint extension and flexion. Findings and Outcomes: The powered hip orthosis, when compared to the IRGO, increased the speed of walking, the step length and also the cadence demonstrated by this subject. Vertical and horizontal compensatory motions with new orthosis decreased. Hip angles when walking with this orthosis were comparative to those demonstrated by normal walking patterns. Conclusions: The hip actuator produced positive effects on the kinematics and temporal-spatial parameters of gait during level-ground walking trials, resulting in an alternative approach to walking by SCI patients.
Clinical relevanceThis orthosis has the potential to improve hip joint kinematics, the temporal-spatial parameters of gait in SCI patients walking.
A large and significant effect on perceived pain in patients with first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis was observed after 4 weeks of splint use. Differences in treatment effects were found with regard to muscle cross-sectional areas, but these were not significant. Clinical relevance Custom-made splints may be recommended for the treatment of first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Moderate to large but non-significant treatment effects were found with regard to muscle cross-sectional areas.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.