Objective: translate and validate to Portuguese the Scale of Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning. Material and Methods: methodological translation and validation study of a research tool. After following all steps of the translation process, for the validation process, the event III Workshop Brazil - Portugal: Care Delivery to Critical Patients was created, promoted by one Brazilian and another Portuguese teaching institution. Results: 103 nurses participated. As to the validity and reliability of the scale, the correlation pattern between the variables, the sampling adequacy test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) and the sphericity test (Bartlett) showed good results. In the exploratory factorial analysis (Varimax), item 9 behaved better in factor 1 (Satisfaction) than in factor 2 (Self-confidence in learning). The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) showed coefficients of 0.86 in factor 1 with six items and 0.77 for factor 2 with 07 items. Conclusion: in Portuguese this tool was called: Escala de Satisfação de Estudantes e Autoconfiança na Aprendizagem. The results found good psychometric properties and a good potential use. The sampling size and specificity are limitations of this study, but future studies will contribute to consolidate the validity of the scale and strengthen its potential use.

Objective:to identify in the literature the gains health students and professionals perceive when using clinical simulation with dramatization resources. Method:integrative literature review, using the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). A search was undertaken in the following databases: Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Web of Science, National Library of Medicine, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online. Results:53 studies were analyzed, which complied with the established inclusion criteria. Among the different gains obtained, satisfaction, self-confidence, knowledge, empathy, realism, reduced level of anxiety, comfort, communication, motivation, capacity for reflection and critical thinking and teamwork stand out. Conclusion:the evidence demonstrates the great possibilities to use dramatization in the context of clinical simulation, with gains in the different health areas, as well as interprofessional gains.

Objective: to translate and validate to Portuguese the Debriefi ng Experience Scale jointly with individuals that used highfi delity simulation in learning. Method: methodological and exploratory study for an instrument translation and validation. For the validation process, the event "III Workshop Brazil -Portugal: Care Delivery to Critical Patients" was created. Results: 103 nurses attended. Validity and reliability of the scale, the correlation pattern among variables, the sampling adequacy test, and the sphericity test showed good results. Since there was no relationship among the groups established in the exploratory factor analysis, the option was to follow the division established by the original version. Conclusion: the version of the instrument was called Escala de Experiência com o Debriefi ng. The results showed good psychometric properties and a good potential for use. However, further studies will contribute to consolidate the validity of the scale and strengthen its potential use. Descriptors: Simulation; Teaching; Nursing Education; Patient Simulation; Debriefi ng. RESUMO Objetivo: traduzir e validar para língua portuguesa a Debriefi ng Experience Scale junto a indivíduos que utilizaram a simulação de alta fi delidade na sua formação. Método: estudo do tipo metodológico, exploratório de tradução e validação de instrumento. Para o processo de validação criou-se o evento: III Workshop Brasil -Portugal: Atendimento ao Paciente Crítico. Resultados: participaram 103 enfermeiros. A validade e fi delidade da escala, o padrão de correlação entre as variáveis, o teste de adequação amostral e o teste de esfericidade apresentaram bons resultados. Por não haver nexo entre os agrupamentos estabelecidos na análise fatorial exploratória optou-se por seguir a divisão estabelecida pela versão original. Conclusão: o instrumento foi denominado: Escala de Experiência com o Debriefi ng. Os resultados constataram boas propriedades psicométricas e um bom potencial de utilização, porém futuros trabalhos contribuirão para consolidar a validade da escala e reforçar o seu potencial de utilização. Descritores: Simulação; Ensino; Educação em Enfermagem; Simulação de Paciente; Debriefi ng. RESUMEN Objetivo: traducir y validar para el portugués la Debriefi ng Experience Scale con individuos que utilizaron la simulación de alta fi delidad en su formación. Método: estudio metodológico, exploratorio de traducción y validación de instrumento. Para el proceso de validación, se organizó el evento III Workshop Brasil -Portugal: Atención del Paciente Crítico. Resultados: Participaron 103 enfermeros. La validez y fi delidad de la escala, el estándar de correlación entre las variables, el test de adecuación muestral y el test de esfericidad expresaron buenos resultados. Por no existir nexo entre los agrupamientos establecidos en el análisis factorial exploratorio, se optó por seguir la división determinada por la versión original. Conclusión: el instrumento fue retitulado como Escala de Experiencia con el Debriefi ng. Los result...

RESUMO Este ensaio teve como objetivo refletir sobre as contribuições da edição mais recente do Programa de Educação pelo Trabalho para a Saúde - PET-Saúde/Interprofissionalidade para a implementação da Política Nacional de Educação Permanente em Saúde (PNEPS) no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde. Nesse contexto, resgata-se a contemporaneidade da formação em saúde, a Educação Interprofissional e o processo formativo, e a execução do PET-Saúde/Interprofissionalidade como potencializador da prática colaborativa na atenção primária. Ressalta-se que, diante dos inúmeros desafios vivenciados pelos serviços de saúde para responder às demandas populacionais variadas e influenciadas pela transição demográfica e epidemiológica, entende-se como necessário ensaiar reflexões sobre a interprofissionalidade e suas contribuições para a implementação da PNEPS. Acredita-se que este material possa subsidiar a discussão e atuação profissional na elaboração e realização de intervenções interprofissionais apropriadas para as diferentes demandas em saúde.

Considering the lack of tools to assess the results associated with the use of simulation as a teaching strategy, this study aimed to translate and validate to the Portuguese language the Simulation Design Scale (Student Version). A methodological study of instrument translation and validation was undertaken. After accomplishing all steps of the translation process, the validation process took place in the context of an event on critical patient care. In total, 103 registered nurses participated in the study. The validity and reliability of the scale, the pattern of correlation between variables, the sampling adequacy test and the sphericity test showed satisfactory results. As there is no connection among the groupings established in the exploratory factor analysis, it was decided to follow the division established in the original version. The scale was named Escala do Design da Simulação [in Portuguese]. It is concluded that the scale has good psychometric properties and an appropriate potential, although further research is needed for their consolidation.

Objective: to validate an instrument to measure self-confidence of nursing care in urinary retention. Methods: methodological research study, carried out after ethical approval. A Likert-like scale of 32 items related to nursing care in urinary retention was applied to students of the graduate nursing course. For instrument validation, analysis of the sample adequacy and main components, Varimax orthogonal rotation and internal consistency analyses were developed. Results: in a sample of 305 students, there was high correlation of all items with the total scale and Cronbach's alpha of 0.949. The scale items were divided into five factors with internal consistency: Factor 1 (0.890), Factor 2 (0.874), Factor 3 (0.868), Factor 4 (0.814) and Factor 5 (0.773), respectively. Conclusion: the scale meets the validity requirements, demonstrating potential for use in evaluation and research.

There is a lack of empathy studies in professional practice contexts, in human resource development programs, and throughout the professional education process.

Utilização de escalas de design e autoconfiança na avaliação da simulação realística materno-infantil Use of the design and self-confidence scales in the assessment of maternal-child realistic simulation Utilización de escalas de diseño y autoconfianza en la evaluación de la simulación realista materno-infantil