No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Rosaceae is a large family in the plant regality, includes 3200 species in 115 genera such as Malus and Pyrus to which belong Malus domestica Borkh. fruits (apples) and Pyrus communis L. fruits (pears). Apples and pears have a wide variety of active constituents like anthocyanins, flavonoids, sterols, and tannins. P. communis and M. domestica fruits exhibit good antioxidant, antihyperglycemic, and chemopreventive activities. Botanists prefer to keep apple and pear under genus Pyrus but recently, American authors keep them distinct, apple under genus Malus and pear under genus Pyrus. Hybrids were developed to produce cultivars adapted to Egypt warm weather, so there is a large similarity between the different pear and apple cultivars which requires accurate and rapid techniques for their differentiation. The genetic discrimination between apple cultivars, Anna (1), Volus (2), Dorset golden (3) and pear cultivars, Le-Conte (4), MKM (5) and Flordahome (6) were carried out using start codon targeted and inter simple sequence repeat techniques with ten decamer primers, five for each technique. All primers gave bands with all cultivars with total 49 bands, 26 with ISSR and 23 with SCoT techniques, respectively with 27, 19 and 3 monomorphic, polymorphic and unique bands, respectively. According to combined dendrogram and similarity matrix, apple and pear cultivars grouped into two main groups, one contains the apple cultivars and the other contains pear cultivars with similarity coefficient 0.76-0.92. As a result, we can use ISSR and SCoT techniques for differentiation between apple and pear cultivars which have large morphological similarity.

No abstract

Mosquitoes are unquestionably the most medic arthropod vectors of disease. Culex pipiens, usually defined as a common house mosquito, is a well-known carrier of several virus diseases. Crude ethanol extracts of different organs of Agratum houstonianum are tested with Culex pipiens Linnaeus (Diptera: Culicidae) to determine their larvicidal, antifeedant, and repellency effects. Alongside biochemical analysis, the activity of the AChE, ATPase, CarE, and CYP-450 is detected in the total hemolymph of the C. pipiens larvae to examine the enzymatic action on the way to explain their neurotoxic effect and mode of action. Through HPLC and GC–MS analysis of the phytochemical profile of A. houstonianum aerial parts is identified. The larvicidal activity of aerial parts; flower (AF), leaf (AL), and stem (AS) of A. houstonianum extracts are evaluated against the 3rd instar larvae of C. pipiens at 24-, 48- and 72-post-treatment. A. houstonianium AF, AL, and AS extracts influenced the mortality of larvae with LC50 values 259.79, 266.85, and 306.86 ppm, respectively after 24 h of application. The potency of AF and AL extracts was 1.69- and 1.25-folds than that of AS extract, respectively. A high repellency percentage was obtained by AF extract 89.10% at a dose of 3.60 mg/cm2. A. houstonianium AF prevailed inhibition on acetylcholinesterase and decrease in carboxylesterase activity. Moreover, a significant increase in the ATPase levels and a decrease in cytochrome P-450 monooxegenase activity (− 36.60%) are detected. HPLC analysis prevailed chlorogenic and rosmarinic acid as the major phenolic acids in AL and AF, respectively. GC–MS analysis of A. houstonianum results in the identification of phytol as the major makeup. Precocene I and II were detected in AF. Linoleic, linolenic, and oleic acid were detected in comparable amounts in the studied organs. Overall, results suggest that the A. houstonianum flower extract (AF) exhibits significant repellent, antifeedant, and larvicidal activities.

No abstract