This paper aims to analyze the mechanism for submitting and granting restitution as the responsibility of perpetrators of crimes. This is to fulfill the rights of children who are victims of criminal acts. The implemented provisions governing the submission and granting of restitution are regulated in PP No. 44 of 2008 and PP No. 43 of 2017. However, the implementation of the restitution provision,which is the right of the child (victim), has not been fully implemented due to a lack of maximum assistance by the relevant government, such us fulfilling the rights of victims to obtain rehabilitation, compensation and restitution as a form of protection of children after the occurrence of a crime for the loss suffered by the child and / or the family of the victim. This study uses doctrinal research (doctrinal legal research), while the approach used is (socio-legal studies) an effort to explore a problem by not only fulfilling the study of legal norms or doctrines, but also looking comprehensively at the context of norms and enforcement. The results showed that the submission of restitution stipulated in Government Regulation No. 43 of 2017 outlines that restitution is a compensation payment charged to the perpetrator based on a court decision. It has permanent legal force for material and immaterial losses suffered by the victim or his family, as in the case of giving restitution for a non specifically regulated the period of payment and a rejection of payments from perpetrators of sexual crimes.
Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk membahas tentang kedudukan hak yang tidak seimbang atas pengaturan kepemilikan barang dan peralatan dalam kontrak kerjasama migas. Mengingat bahwa pengusahaan hasil bumi berupa migas merupakan cabang produksi vital bagi negara karena memiliki ketergantungan bagi hajat hidup orang banyak. Tujuan dibentuknya Undang-Undang Migas salah satunya untuk merespon adanya perkembangan pengelolaan migas berupa kerjasama yang dilakukan oleh negara dengan penanam modal (kontraktor). Hubungan negara dan penanam modal diperkuat secara hukum dengan kontrak kerjasama bagi hasil produksi yang juga mengatur kedudukan hak kepemilikan barang dan peralatan dalam operasi migas, kedudukan penanam modal dalam kontrak tersebut cenderung tidak berimbang karena negara secara absolut mengatur bahwa kedudukan atas barang tersebut menjadi barang milik negara tanpa adanya ganti rugi atau kompensasi. Disamping itu, kedudukan kontrak kerjasama juga merugikan penanam modal dengan intervensi berbagai peraturan yang dapat merubah ketentuan dalam kontrak yang telah disepakati. Oleh karena itu, penting untuk diketahui secara mendalam dengan mendasarkan pada landasan asas hukum kontrak untuk melihat daya kerja asas-asas dalam Undang-Undang Migas telah sesuai dengan asas keseimbangan dan proporsionalitas.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.