This study focuses on the issues of firstly whether the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) particularly copyrights can be used as collateral debt/credit? Second, whether the copyright can be used as collateral debt/credit through a scheme of pawn guarantee? and third, whether copyright can be used as collateral debt/credit through a scheme of fiduciary guarantee? This is a normative research with legislation and conceptual approach. The result of the study concluded that first; Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in particular copyright has been legalized as the collateral object through fiduciary scheme under Article 16 of Law No. 28, 2014. IPR in the form of tangible material can be bound with the pawn and/or fiduciary guarantee. While the Intellectual Property Rights in the intangible or non-material form can only be bound by fiduciary guarantee. Second, the Copyright in the form of material or tangible objects in the perspective of the Guarantees Law can be used as collateral guarantee through the pawn scheme. However, Law No. 28 of 2014 regulates completely about this matter. Third, the Copyright in the form of intangible or immaterial objects in the perspective of the Guarantee Law can be used as the collateral guarantee through fiduciary scheme as stipulated in Article 16 of Law No. 28, 2014. However, the implementation of these rules in the banking sector is still constrained as there has been no revision of the Bank Indonesia Regulation (PBI) No. 9/6 / PBI / 2007 in terms of the bank credit collateral.
Copyright protection of digital products in an open-source system has led to the emergence of copyleft against copyright. Copyleft licenses in open-source serve to impose limits on creations to protect creators' moral rights. At the same time, personal data protection is one part of personal rights amidst the advent of information technology. The development of copyleft products and licenses that usually take place online can potentially lead to violations that harm application developers’ personal data. This paper aimed to characterize copyleft as an antithesis of copyright and analyze legal protection on the open-source application developers' personal data. Using legal research, this paper showed that open-source licenses could consist of two categories. First, non-copyleft licenses in the form of permissive licenses, included in the software under it and are subject to copyright. Second, the copyleft license, which required licenses to modify and distribute copyleft products. This open-source license adopted a form of a standard contract and personal data protection in copyleft products through open-source sites were using a preventive and repressive way. This paper recommended a copyleft-based legal protection mechanism and creators' data by considering the comparative aspects of the copyleft and copyright concepts' characteristics to respect moral rights. KEYWORDS: Personal Data Protection, Indonesia’s Copyright Law, Copyleft License.
Traditional alcoholic beverages have existed in Indonesian culture and society for various purposes. Its existence has been influenced by the concoction of alcoholic beverages which adversely affects the traditional alcoholic beverages’ image. These beverages are actually Intellectual Property Rights, IPR-based products of cultural heritage with indications of origin that have characteristics so that they cannot be compared to other countries’ alcoholic beverages, even though current regulations still regulate the opposite. This paper examines the legal protection of Indonesian traditional alcoholic beverages which are also adapted to their characteristics and the influence of Indonesian legal culture on these traditional alcoholic beverages. This research is a normative study with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach method with South Korea and France as a comparison. Prudent and objective legal protection from the point of view of IPR for traditional alcoholic beverages is expected to develop positive aspects while still anticipating negative ones. This study concludes that Indonesian traditional alcoholic beverages that fulfill 3 unique characteristics can be protected as intangible cultural heritage (public property) or an indication of origin (belongs to local communities), although what is more appropriate now is an indication of origin so that the Government needs to adjust the regulatory design, especially at the national level, according to the indication of origin. AbstrakMinuman alkohol tradisional telah ada di budaya masyarakat Indonesia dengan berbagai tujuan peruntukan. Perkembangan eksistensinya dipengaruhi oleh minuman beralkohol racikan yang memberi pengaruh buruk ke citra alkohol tradisional. Minuman alkohol tradisional sesungguhnya merupakan produk berbasis kekayaan intelektual di bidang warisan budaya dan indikasi asal yang memiliki karakteristik sehingga tidak dapat disamakan dengan minuman beralkohol lainnya, meskipun regulasi yang ada saat ini masih mengatur sebaliknya. Tulisan ini meneliti mengenai pelindungan hukum minuman alkohol tradisional khas Indonesia yang disesuaikan pula dengan karakteristiknya dan pengaruh budaya hukum masyarakat Indonesia terhadap minuman alkohol tradisional tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, serta pendekatan perbandingan dengan Korea Selatan dan Prancis. Pelindungan hukum yang bijak dan objektif dari sudut pandang Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) terhadap minuman alkohol tradisional diharapkan dapat mengembangkan aspek positif dengan tetap mengantisipasi aspek negatifnya. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa minuman alkohol tradisional khas Indonesia yang memenuhi 3 karakteristik khusus dapat dilindungi sebagai warisan budaya tak benda (milik publik) ataupun indikasi asal (milik masyarakat lokal) walaupun yang lebih tepat untuk diterapkan saat ini adalah indikasi asal sehingga Pemerintah perlu menyesuaikan perancangan regulasi di tingkat pusat sesuai indikasi asal.
AbstrakPenelitian ini mengangkat permasalahan, pertama, posisi perusahaan mutual Asuransi Jiwa Bersama Bumiputera 1912 (AJBB) dalam perspektif hukum perusahaan. Kedua, permasalahan hukum dalam restrukturisasi perusahaan mutual AJBB? Ketiga, terobosan hukum dalam restrukturisasi perusahaan mutual AJBB. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan perundangundangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan, pertama, perusahaan mutual belum diatur dalam undang-undang tersendiri. Hal ini berbeda dengan koperasi dan perseroan terbatas yang sudah diatur dalam undang-undang tersendiri. Kedua, restrukturisasi perusahaan mutual terkendala karena hingga kini hanya ada satu perusahaan jenis ini di Indonesia, sehingga sulit untuk melakukan merger dan konsolidasi. Perusahaan mutual juga tidak bisa diakuisisi sebab kepemilikannya tidak berbentuk saham melainkan keanggotaan. Ketiga, terobosan hukum diperlukan untuk merestrukturisasi perusahaan mutual dengan cara mendirikan perusahaan baru berbentuk perseroan terbatas. Semua aktiva dan pasiva selanjutnya dialihkan ke perusahaan baru, sehingga calon investor dan kreditor akan lebih tertarik menanamkan dana, sebab saham perusahaan baru lebih mudah diperjualbelikan dan dijadikan jaminan utang.Kata-kata Kunci: Restrukturisasi; perusahaan mutual; hukum perusahaan
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.