Diferentes cultivares de tomateiro podem apresentar necessidades hídricas diferenciadas, tornando-se indispensável o estudo da demanda hídrica. Desta forma, objetivou-se avaliar a influência de diferentes tensões de água no solo sobre a produção e qualidade pós-colheita de frutos do tomateiro, cultivar Dominador F1, sob cultivo protegido e irrigado por gotejamento. O experimento foi instalado em casa de vegetação com delineamento em blocos casualizados, com quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram constituídos por seis tensões de água no solo como indicativos do momento de irrigar. As tensões preestabelecidas foram 20, 45, 70, 95, 120 e 145 kPa a 20 cm de profundidade. Aos 140 dias após o transplantio as variáveis avaliadas foram: produção total, comercial e não comercial de frutos; produtividade total, comercial e não comercial de frutos; número de frutos por planta; classificação dos frutos comerciais; massa média dos frutos comerciais; incidência de podridão apical (%); eficiência no uso da água (EUA); acidez titulável (AT); sólidos solúveis totais (SST); pH; relação sólidos solúveis totais e acidez titulável (SST/AT); pectina solúvel; vitamina C; firmeza; coloração e teor de macro e micronutrientes da parte aérea. Os resultados demonstraram que para a obtenção dos maiores valores de produção e produtividade de frutos comerciais, número de frutos por planta, número de frutos grandes e médios e massa média de frutos comerciais, deve-se irrigar quando a tensão de água no solo estiver, em torno, de 20 kPa, à profundidade de 0,20 m. As diferentes tensões de água no solo não influenciaram, significativamente, a acidez titulável, pH, relação sólidos solúveis totais e acidez titulável e pectina solúvel. A eficiência no uso da água, em função das tensões de água no solo, aumentou até a tensão de 116,57 kPa. Das características de qualidade avaliadas, os teores de sólidos solúveis totais, de vitamina C, firmeza e índice L* de coloração, apresentaram efeito significativo com as tensões de água no solo.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the vegetative development of radish seedlings in different organic substrates with seeds from two types of commercial packing. The completely randomized design was used in a 4 x 2 factorial scheme, consisting of four substrates (commercial, tanned bovine manure, mixed organic compound and vermicompost) and two seed packings (aluminized envelope and can), with eight replications, totalizing 64 seedlings. The biometric evaluations of the seedlings were carried out on the 14th day after sowing, and the following phytotechnical parameters were evaluated: leaf number, total fresh mass; fresh mass from aerial part and fresh mass from the root. According to the results, the commercial, vermicompost and mixed organic substrates provided the best results for the variables evaluated when the can was used.
Yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius [Poepp.] H. Rob., Asteraceae) is an Andean plant being explored as a functional food, due to high concentrations of fructooligosaccharides (FOS), a natural sweetener capable of reducing blood lipids and glucose levels, supporting prevention of chronic diseases, such as diabetes. Yacon commercial production is still being established, thus cropping practices and their impact on profitability are yet poorly explained. Improved planting recommendations are demanded, as it affects crop yield. In this background, a field trial was conducted to determine row spacing and plant populations for yacon production in tropical highland areas. The experimental design was a randomized complete block, in a split-plot scheme, where blocks were three row spacings (0.8, 1.0 and 1.2 m) and subplots covered three spacings between plants (0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 m), with four replicates. At harvest time, evaluations on accumulation of dry mass in the plant and tuber root production data (number, weight, total productivity, and per class) were made. Profitability indicators were estimated (gross income, operational profit, and benefit-cost ratio). Data suggest productive and economic variations among tested planting configurations, as an example higher productivity (31.5 t ha -1 ) and positive benefit-cost ratio (2.51) when using 1.0 m between rows and 0.4 m between plants for the conditions tested. These results point out the prospect to select better crop management practices for yacon, cutting costs, and increasing yield. Another key find was yacon's capacity to overcome intense drought and temperature stress, not previously documented for this crop. Therefore, yacon is a new crop with potential to boost farming income through crop diversification.
Yacon is a crop which requires development of strategies for its cultivation. One of the possibilities is to introduce yacon in perennial crops using intercropping system. The aim of this study was to evaluate different planting densities of yacon grown in intercropping with corn under banana orchard, verifying its development and production. At 90 days after planting, morphological and physiological evaluations were done, at 210 days yacon was harvested, and its productivity calculated using the fresh tuberous root production. The Area Equivalence Index (IEA), and the Relative Contribution of Crops (CRC) to IEA were calculated. Yacon development and production were hampered by the corn intercropping (under the banana orchard), regardless of the yacon density used. IEA increased with yacon and corn intercropping in relation to greater CRC of corn to the intercropping and its market value, the system presented higher gross income. Planting yacon under banana orchard optimizes the use of the area and it is profitable for the farmer, especially when yacon is planted in double rows, alternating between banana rows, spacing 0.3 and 0.4 m.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.