The Elecsys® AMH assay demonstrated good precision under routine conditions, and is suitable for determining AMH levels in serum and lithium-heparin plasma.
BACKGROUNDThis study evaluated the predictive value of serum and follicular fluid (FF) concentrations of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) with respect to treatment outcome variables in an IVF cycle.METHODSA retrospective analysis was performed with data from 731 normogonadotrophic women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation after stimulation with highly purified menotrophin (HP-hMG) or rFSH following a long GnRH agonist protocol.RESULTSIn both treatment groups, the serum AMH concentration at the start of the stimulation was significantly (P < 0.001) positively correlated with the serum levels of estradiol (HP-hMG: r = 0.45; rFSH: r = 0.55), androstenedione (HP-hMG: r = 0.50; rFSH: 0.49) and total testosterone (HP-hMG: r = 0.40; rFSH: r = 0.36) at the end of the stimulation as well as the number of oocytes retrieved (HP-hMG: r = 0.48; rFSH: r = 0.62), the AMH concentration in FF (HP-hMG: r = 0.55; rFSH: 0.61) and the serum progesterone concentration (HP-hMG: r = 0.39; rFSH: r = 0.50) at oocyte retrieval. For both treatments, serum AMH at the start of the stimulation was a good predictor of the need to increase or decrease the gonadotrophin dose on stimulation day 6 and of ovarian response below (<7 oocytes) or above (>15 oocytes) the target. No significant relationships were observed between serum AMH and embryo quality or ongoing pregnancy.CONCLUSIONThe serum AMH concentration at the start of the stimulation in IVF patients down-regulated with GnRH agonist in the long protocol revealed a positive relationship with ovarian response to gonadotrophins in terms of oocytes retrieved and accompanying endocrine response. AMH is a good predictor of the need for gonadotrophin-dose adjustment on stimulation day 6 for patients with a fixed starting dose, but a poor predictor of embryo quality and pregnancy chances in individual patients.
Profound suppression of LH on day 8 of stimulation is associated with a significantly higher chance of achieving an ongoing pregnancy. More studies are necessary to evaluate this phenomenon further.
The effect of elevated serum progesterone concentrations (> 1 ng/l) on or before the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) injection on the outcome of women receiving gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa)/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was evaluated. A total of 1275 ICSI cycles were analysed retrospectively. In 53 cycles (4.5%), serum progesterone concentrations were > 1 ng/ml. Patients in the high progesterone group had significantly higher oestradiol and luteinizing hormone concentrations on the day of HCG injection. The characteristics of the cumulus-corona cell complexes and the nuclear maturity of the oocytes were similar in the groups of patients with high and low serum progesterone levels. Fertilization and cleavage rates as well as embryo quality were not different in the two groups. No difference in implantation or clinical pregnancy rates was observed between the high progesterone and low progesterone groups. Moreover, the cumulative exposure to progesterone during the follicular phase, as expressed by the area under the curve (AUC), and the duration of exposure to high serum progesterone levels (> 1 ng/ml) were not significantly different between pregnant and non-pregnant women in the high progesterone group. We conclude that in ICSI cycles pretreated with GnRHa, increased serum progesterone concentrations on or before the day of HCG injection do not affect ICSI outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.