2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter evaluation of the first automated Elecsys sFlt-1 and PlGF assays in normal pregnancies and preeclampsia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work from our group as well as from others has consistently shown that the automated measurement of sFlt-1, PlGF and the calculation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is a reliable tool for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. 8,10,[13][14][15] We reported earlier a cutoff of 85 for the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio as an aid in diagnosis of preeclampsia regardless of the gestational week tested. This preliminary cutoff was based on a casecontrol cohort of 71 patients with preeclampsia and 280 control patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work from our group as well as from others has consistently shown that the automated measurement of sFlt-1, PlGF and the calculation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is a reliable tool for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. 8,10,[13][14][15] We reported earlier a cutoff of 85 for the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio as an aid in diagnosis of preeclampsia regardless of the gestational week tested. This preliminary cutoff was based on a casecontrol cohort of 71 patients with preeclampsia and 280 control patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Various groups have shown that 1 single cutoff at 85 is not optimal for diagnosing preeclampsia or other hypertensive pregnancy disorders in all clinical settings. 14,19,20 The new gestational phase-specific 2 cutoffs allow maximized accuracy of diagnosis. A more precise diagnosis and gestational phase-dependent analysis might have future therapeutic consequences.…”
Section: Clinical Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Meanwhile fast and accurate assays working on existing diagnostic platforms, including a point-of-care assay, have been developed. 7,11,12,26,27 The diagnostic performance of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is better than that of the individual values of sFlt-1 and PlGF. 7,11 With a cutoff value of 85, the reported sensitivity and specificity of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio are 89% and 97% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.97) for preterm preeclampsia and 74% and 89% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.87) for late-onset preeclampsia.…”
Section: Sflt-1/plgf Ratio As a Diagnostic Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of angiogenic factors using automated assays (sFlt-1 and PlGF) has proven to be clinically useful for routine diagnosis of preeclampsia (Ohkuchi et al 2010;Schiettecatte et al 2010;Sunderji et al 2010;Verlohren et al 2010;Benton et al 2011;Knudsen et al 2012). Several groups have shown that sFlt-1 and free PlGF levels can be used to differentiate preeclampsia from diseases that mimic preeclampsia, such as chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, kidney disease, and gestational thrombocytopenia (Salahuddin et al 2007;Sunderji et al 2010;Perni et al 2012;Rolfo et al 2012;Verdonk et al 2012).…”
Section: Angiogenic Factors As Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%