Neutron peripheral contamination in patients undergoing high-energy photon radiotherapy is considered as a risk factor for secondary cancer induction. Organ-specific neutron-equivalent dose estimation is therefore essential for a reasonable assessment of these associated risks. This work aimed to develop a method to estimate neutron-equivalent doses in multiple organs of radiotherapy patients. The method involved the convolution, at 16 reference points in an anthropomorphic phantom, of the normalized Monte Carlo neutron fluence energy spectra with the kerma and energy-dependent radiation weighting factor. This was then scaled with the total neutron fluence measured with passive detectors, at the same reference points, in order to obtain the equivalent doses in organs. The latter were correlated with the readings of a neutron digital detector located inside the treatment room during phantom irradiation. This digital detector, designed and developed by our group, integrates the thermal neutron fluence. The correlation model, applied to the digital detector readings during patient irradiation, enables the online estimation of neutron-equivalent doses in organs. The model takes into account the specific irradiation site, the field parameters (energy, field size, angle incidence, etc) and the installation (linac and bunker geometry). This method, which is suitable for routine clinical use, will help to systematically generate the dosimetric data essential for the improvement of current risk-estimation models.
The results of the present investigation indicate that low intratumoral tPA levels are associated with aggressiveness and poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. However, the study suggests that tPA levels do not predict response to systemic adjuvant therapy.
This paper presents the results obtained in a study of LiF TLD-100 performance for mailed dosimetry in radiotherapy, using glow curve analysis of TL evaluation and reusable chips. An excellent reusability is assured by a simple thermal treatment of 1 h at 400 degrees C followed by a controlled and reproducible cooling to room temperature that accurately reproduces the sensitivity of the detectors. Particular attention was devoted to studying sensitivity changes during room temperature storage of TLD-100 detectors. These changes can be one of the major sources of uncertainty in mailed dosimetry, where long intervals can occur between detector preparation, irradiation and readout. Based on the features of the individual peak evolution during storage a rather simple method to correct for these sensitivity modifications is proposed. The analysis of the different influential factors permitted us to estimate a combined uncertainty for the measurement of absorbed doses within the 0.5-4 Gy range of 1.0%.
The Editor, Sir, Thermoluminescence Dosimetry (TLD) is widely used in medical applications. One of TLD's most important features is its flexibility due to the variety of TLD materials and physical forms available. Also, different procedures are used throughout the world when handling and evaluating TLD material. It is important to be aware of these factors to appreciate a particular dosimetric measurement and its results. However, reporting standards on TLD measurements vary considerably in the literature. In some circumstances this may lead to incomplete data that makes it difficult to assess the actual measurements performed. Therefore, an ad hoc group was formed at the recent 12th International Conference on Solid State Dosimetry in Burgos (Delgado and Gomez-Ros 1999) in order to compile a list of information that should be considered when reporting clinical TLD measurements. The following list should be seen as a checklist for a section on materials and methods. The authors must then decide which information is relevant to the measurements performed. It should be noted though that the information indicated by an asterisk ( * ) is considered essential.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.