PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes including patient-reported outcome measures in a sample of eyes undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of a new model of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: This non-randomized prospective case series enrolled 206 eyes of 103 patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of the TECNIS Synergy IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision). High and low contrast visual acuity, refractive, defocus curve, and patient-reported visual performance (Catquest-9SF questionnaire) outcomes were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 96.1% (99 of 103) and 91.3% (94 of 103) of patients achieved binocular postoperative uncorrected distance (UDVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA) of 0.00 logMAR (20/20), respectively. Mean postoperative mesopic UNVA for both eyes was 0.14 ± 0.03 logMAR. Likewise, mean binocular UDVA and UNVA were 0.00 ± 0.03 and 0.04 ± 0.02 logMAR. An almost flat mean defocus curve was obtained, with visual acuities between 0.00 and 0.10 logMAR for most defocus levels in both eyes. A reduction of contrast led to a limited but statistically significant change in UNVA in both eyes ( P < .001). The Rasch calibrated scoring of item 2 and the Rasch calibrated mean score of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire increased significantly with surgery ( P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This new presbyopia-correcting IOL provides a continuous range of functional focus, with a limited deterioration under mesopic conditions, which is perceived as a satisfactory outcome by the patient if proper patient selection is performed. [ J Refract Surg . 2021;37(4):256–262.]

Introduction: The crosslinking (CXL) procedure using the standard Dresden protocol is established as the gold standard for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. Aim: The aim of this paper is to correlate the pachymetry and elevation back map (EBM) changes in the period from 3 to12 months of keratoconus patients after the CXL procedure. Methods: Forty-four eyes of 34 patients with keratoconus were analyzed after performed standard Dresden protocol CXL procedure. All of them underwent complete preoperative examination with a follow up of 12 months with a focus on pachymetry and EBM changes performed by Oculus Pentacam (Scheimpflug technology) analysis. Results: Pachymetry changed significantly in 12 months post cross-linking, especially in the first 6 months after which it slightly increased. Differences in EBM preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Corneal pachymetry in keratoconus patients decreases after the CXL procedure. Differences in pachymetry preoperatively and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively were statistically significant, but the value of corneal thickness increased from the third month to 12 months post-op. Differences in EBM preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively were not still statistically significant, which is good, because the increase in elevation, as one of the signs of progression of the keratoconus-did not occur.

No abstract

No abstract

Myopia is the most prevalent refractive error in the world and its incidence is increasing. Together with conservative methods of treatment, various surgical methods have been proposed. Corneal refractive surgery is probably the most accepted one. Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) are suitable for treatment of myopia up to −8.00 D in the younger age group. For patients not suitable for corneal refractive surgery, lens-based procedures are available. Phakic intraocular lenses are suitable for patients younger than 45 years of age with high myopia or some other contraindications for corneal refractive surgery. For older patients, refractive lens exchange (RLE) with implantation of multifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses is gaining popularity.

We describe a case of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) changes in the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in a patient that had suffered Berlin's edema after a whiplash neck injury. The patient reported central scotoma throughout the 1-year follow-up, confirmed by visual field examination. OCTA showed FAZ enlargement of the left eye as compared to the healthy right eye in the superficial capillary layer and even more in the deep capillary layer. To the best of our knowledge, FAZ enlargement has not been previously described by OCTA after whiplash-related macular injury.

Purpose To compare changes in astigmatism by refraction and total corneal astigmatism after tPRK, LASIK and FsLASIK. Setting Specialty Eye Hospital Svjetlost, Zagreb, Croatia. Design Partially masked, semi-randomized, prospective, case-by-case, interventional, clinical study. Methods Patients with a stable refraction (-0.75DS to −8.00DS, astigmatism ≤1.00DC) underwent tPRK, LASIK or FsLASIK without complication. Astigmatism was measured at both corneal surfaces over the central 3.2 mm zone (approximately using Pentacam HRTM) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Pentacam and refraction data were subjected to vector analysis to calculate the surgically induced changes in i) total corneal astigmatism (SIATCA) ii) any astigmatism by refraction (SIAR) and the vectorial difference (DV) between SIATCA and SIAR. Results Reporting key findings (p < .01), there was a significant difference between mean SIATCA and SIAR powers after tPRK (75eyes) but not after LASIK (100eyes) or FsLASIK (100eyes). Mean (±sd,95% CIs) values for DV powers were, tPRK −1.13DC(±0.71, −1.29 to −0.97), LASIK −0.39DC(±0.23,-0.44 to −0.34), FsLASIK −0.55DC(±0.38,-0.62 to −0.47). The differences were significant. For the tPRK and FsLASIK cases, linear regression revealed significant associations between I) SIATCA (x) &DV (z) powers (tPRK z = 1.586x-0.179, r  =  0.767, p < .01; FsLASIK z  =  0.442x-0.303, r  =  .484,p < .01), II) sines of SIATCA (x1) &DV (z1) axes (tPRK, z1 = 0.523 × 1 + 0.394, r = .650,p < .01; FsLASIK z1 = 0.460 × 1-0.308, r = .465,p < .01). Conclusions tPRK is more prone to unintended changes in astigmatism. The difference between SIATCA & SIAR after tPRK or FsLASIK is mediated by SIATCA. Photoablating deeper regions of the cornea reduces the gap between SIATCA & SIAR.

Cataract surgery is the most common surgery in ophthalmology. The aim of cataract surgery is to restore vision in eyes in which the natural lens became opacified mostly due to the aging of the lens, or the presence of other ocular diseases, which promote earlier cataract formation. During cataract surgery, artificial intraocular lens (IOL) is implanted into the lens capsule and the value of the IOL is planned before surgery based on the preoperative IOL calculation. However, in the significant number of patients, cataract surgery may end up with a postoperative refractive error in which case patients have to wear glasses to reach the full vision for both distance and near correction (if monofocal IOL is used during cataract surgery!). Modern cataract surgery becomes more and more a refractive procedure as well, especially when multifocal and/or toric IOLs are implanted. However, in some specific cases where such IOLs are not applicable, high postoperative refractive error after cataract surgery can significantly influence the quality of the obtained vision. One such example is cataract surgery after penetrating keratoplasty. In this chapter, results of a novel approach of post-PK ametropia correction, namely implantation of sulcus placed AddOn IOLs (also called a piggyback lens) will be presented.