No abstract

AimTo evaluate visual impairment (VI) in children with cerebral palsy (CP).MethodsThis population-based study included 419 children from the Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE) C28 RCP-HR – Register of Cerebral Palsy of Croatia born 2003-2008. Vision in children with CP (according to SCPE) was classified as normal or impaired, with the subcategory of severe VI. The proportion of children with VI was assessed in groups with different CP type/subtype, gross and fine motor function, and gestational age (GA).ResultsA total of 266 children had some degree of VI (266/400; 66.5%), 134 had normal vision, and data on VI were unknown for 19 children. Severe VI was present in 44 children (44/400; 11%). The proportion of children with VI and severe VI increased with the Gross Motor Function Classification System and Bimanual Fine Motor Function levels. Children with bilateral spastic CP had the highest frequency of severe VI (14.9%). The percentage of severe VI in children with bilateral spastic CP was 53.8% in the group born <28 weeks of GA, 13.3% in the group born 28-31 weeks of GA, 11.1% in the group born 32-36 weeks of GA, and 24.4% in the group born >36 weeks of GA (λ2 = 4.95; df = 6; P < 0.001).ConclusionChildren with CP have a high prevalence of VI and severe VI, which is increasing with the level of motor impairment. Severe VI is significantly more common in children with bilateral spastic CP, especially among extremely premature infants.

Color vision is one of the most important factors of human vision. Early detection of color vision malfunction in children is of utmost importance, allowing parents and teachers to take appropriate and timely measures for children’s future professional orientation. A cohort of 300 children aged 4–6 years (49–86 months) were examined by color vision testing and divided into three age groups of 4–5, 5–6 and > 6 years. Their ability to name the fundamental spectral colors and read Ishihara’s pseudoisochromatic plates was recorded. The results obtained are presented in tables and figures. Data analysis showed the youngest group of children to be unsuitable for such testing of color vision. Numerical data revealed considerable percentage deviations as compared to the older groups. In addition, a great difference between the girls and boys indicated psychomotor development to be much faster in girls of that age. Generally, data obtained by the distribution of the results for the two older age groups were consistent with those found in the literature; thus, the authors propose an early examination for the detection of inborn chromatopsia to be performed in preschool children, but not before the age of five. Ishihara’s pseudoisochromatic test can be useful in differentiating between dyschromatic and other children, but it is very difficult to implement for singling out dyschromates according to the protan or deutan type.

The aim was to assess whether standard automated perimetry (SAP) and frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry are able to detect the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on retinal function in DM patients in the early stage of disease and to analyze which method is more specific and sensitive. A randomized cross-sectional study was conducted in three different groups of patients to compare the capability of these two methods to examine visual field and to detect the change in light sensitivity. Visual function was assessed in 60 adults with normal retinal finding, 60 adults with DM without clinically detectable retinopathy and 60 adults with DM and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy but normal visual acuity. FDT perimetry and SAP were performed in all study patients. The presence and severity of diabetic retinopathy was determined by taking and evaluating two 50° field color photographs per eye, macula-centered and disc-centered. The following results were obtained by analyzing parameters in the groups of diabetic patients: sensitivity and specificity of SAP and FDT for medium sensitivity 86.7/33.3 (p<0.061) and 71.7/41.7 (p<0.228), respectively; for medium deficit 41.7/76.7 (p<0.063) and 65/50 (p<0.362), respectively; for loss of variance/ pattern standard deviation (LV/PSD) 51.7/61.7 (p<0.536) and 61.7/51.7 (p<0.666), respectively; and for foveal sensitivity 81.7/36.7 (p<0.096) and 23.3/86.7 (p<0.839), respectively. Analysis of parameters between diabetics and control group yielded sensitivity and specificity for medium sensitivity 71.7/61.7 (p<0.001) and 70.8/55 (p<0.002), respectively; for medium deficit 56.7/60 (p<0.058) and 77.5/43.3 (p<0.037), respectively; for LV/PSD 58.3/58.3 (p<0.042) and 33.3/83.3 (p<0.437), respectively; and for foveal sensitivity 82.5/53.3 (p<0.001) and 28.3/85 (p<0.195), respectively. We concluded that neither of these methods was sensitive and specific enough to distinguish diabetics without retinopathy from diabetics with retinopathy. Both of these methods were highly specific and sensitive to distinguish diabetics from healthy subjects, but neither of these methods proved superior.