At present, an instrument for measuring the quality of life, specifically for patients with gastrointestinal disease, is not available. A new instrument for gastrointestinal disorders that is system-specific has been developed in three phases. In the first phase, questions were collated and then tested on 70 patients with gastrointestinal diseases and those that worked well were retained. In the second phase, the questions were modified and tested on 204 patients and the results verified by international experts. The instrument was also validated against other generic measures of quality of life. During the third phase, the instrument was validated with 168 normal individuals. Reproducibility was tested on 25 patients with stable gastrointestinal disease and responsiveness was tested on 194 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The result is a bilingual (German and English) questionnaire containing 36 questions each with five response categories. The responses to questions are summed to give a numerical score. It is concluded that the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) is ready to be used in clinical practice and research.

No abstract

The probability of adverse and undesirable events during and after operations that have not yet occurred in a finite number of patients (n) can be estimated with Hanley's simple formula, which gives the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the probability of such an event: upper limit of 95% confidence interval = maximum risk = 3/n (for n > 30). Doctors and surgeons should keep this simple rule in mind when complication rates of zero are reported in the literature and when they have not (yet) experienced a disastrous complication in a procedure.

Suture repair was safe for small incisional hernias. Both autoplastic and alloplastic hernia repair yielded comparably low recurrence rates, but led to a high rate of wound infection.

The prospectively collected data from 530 cholecystectomies performed in a university clinic from October 1989 to March 1991 were analyzed after 1 to 3 years of follow-up. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis with that for routine symptomatic gallbladders. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters of 424 routine (noninflamed) LCs and 54 LCs for acutely inflamed gallbladders were compared under the "intention to treat" principle. Operating time was longer in the inflamed group (median 97 minutes versus 75 minutes; p < 0.0001). Significantly more adhesions (20% versus 8%), more blood loss (48% versus 19%), a higher incidence of bile spillage (28% versus 12%), and lost stones (19% versus 8%) were encountered in patients with acute cholecystitis. Common bile duct (CBD) injuries were also more frequent in that group (5.5% versus 0.2%; p = 0.005). The rate of conversion to open surgery was higher than with routine LCs (13% versus 4%). There were two deaths in the routine LC group and none in the acutely inflamed group. There was no difference in postoperative pain intensity or postoperative fatigue according to visual analog scale measurements. Patients with acute cholecystitis stayed only 1 day longer (median 4 days versus 3 days) in hospital. The quality of life scores indicate return to almost normal values by the 14th postoperative day. Long-term follow-up (1-3 years) did not reveal any delayed clinical adverse effects. In summary, LC for inflamed gallbladders has a higher conversion rate than LC for routine symptomatic gallbladders. If successfully performed, it has definite benefit for the patient in terms of better postoperative recovery. The trade-off is that the risk of CBD injury is significantly higher.

This is an interim report of a randomized clinical trial on esophagojejunostomy (E J) versusHunt-Lawrence-Rodino (HLR) pouch as reconstruction techniques following total gastrectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer treatment. The randomized trial preceded a pilot study comparing the Longmire-Gutgemann interposition ant/ the HLR. The pilot study included 7 patients, the randomized trial 38 patients (60 planned). The main outcome variables in the pilot study were food resorption, caloric intake, and body weight. Survival probability and general well-being (quality of life) were measured in the randomized trial. A score was composed of diseasespecific and socio-personal variables with well-being ranging from 0 (worst) to 14 (best) points.Concerning food resorption in the pilot study, no relevant advantage of the duodenal passage was found. The main postoperative disorder was insufficient food intake. Despite a radical operation, a hospital mortality rate of 16%, and a complication rate of 37%, gastric cancer still has a poor prognosis. In the randomized trial only 15 (39%) of 38 patients were alive 1 year after operation, but the survival probability was higher (58%) after HLR than after EJ (24%) (p < 0.05). Hunger and appetite were strongly reduced during the first 6 months after operation. Food intake was less than half of the preoperative values, which was reflected by an average decrease in body weight of 7 kg.Patients dying within the first year after total gastrectomy suffered an irreversible loss of quality of life (scoring 7 points). They had no objective benefit from the operation. Patients surviving this period regained quality of life and exceeded preoperative values, especially after HLR.We conclude that HLR-operated patients who have a chance of surviving for at least 1 year benefit from total gastrectomy in regard to quality of life.

Additional mental training is an effective way of optimizing the outcomes of further training for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It is associated with fewer costs and with better outcomes in some crucial assessment scales than additional practical training.

The widely used Mayo procedure leads to unacceptable results for repair of incisional hernias and other techniques should be evaluated and used more often. Repair of an incisional hernia does not improve overall quality of life.