During the upgrading of the radiobiological facility at the Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (LNL) we found that uncorrected values of the proton energy were used in the past. This circumstance prompted us to perform the re-evaluation of the physical parameters for all the proton beams used in our previous radiobiological investigations (Belli et al. 1987) and, subsequently, the re-evaluation of all our previous dose-response curves for inactivation and mutation induction (Belli et al. 1989, 1991). This re-evaluation leads to significant changes in the dose-response curves and in the RBE-LET relationships only at the two lowest energies (highest LET) used. These two points are not reliable for the identification of a peak in RBE-LET relationship for cell inactivation. In spite of that, the extent of the changes is not such as to modify the general conclusion previously drawn, pointing out that there is a LET range where protons are more effective than alpha-particles.
The survival of V79 Chinese hamster cells irradiated with proton beams with energies of 0.73, 0.84, 1.16, 1.70 and 3.36 MeV, corresponding to LET values, evaluated at the cell midplane, of 34.5, 30.4, 23.9, 17.8 and 10.6 keV/micron respectively, have been studied in the dose range 0.5-6.0 Gy. As a reference, the survival curve obtained with 200 kV X-rays was used. The initial shoulder, typical of survival curves obtained with sparsely ionizing radiation, decreases as the LET increases and completely disappears at 23.9 keV/micron. This value corresponds to the maximum of the RBE, expressed as the initial slope ratio. In the energy range we have considered, the RBEs for protons are higher than those reported for other ions of comparable LET and the RBE-LET relationship results shifted to lower LET values. Our data seem to indicate that the RBE-LET curve depends on the type of radiation and this could imply that LET is not a good reference for the dose-effectiveness relationship.
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a noninvasive method recently introduced for body fluid evaluation in healthy subjects. The purpose of this paper is to verify the reliability of bioelectrical measurements in extracellular water (ECW) prediction in healthy subjects and in fluid retention states. We studied 40 subjects (19 males and 21 females) aged 21-81 years; 22 were healthy subjects, 12 were affected by chronic heart failure, and 6 by chronic renal failure. In all subjects resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) at 1 and 50 kHz corrected for height were compared with ECW measured by the bromide dilution method. Our results suggested a different behavior of the current in fluid-retention states with respect to healthy subjects. ECW was best predicted by resistance at 1 kHz corrected for height, group (considered as dummy variable), weight and gender (R2 = 0.89, p < 0.001, SEE = 1.7 liters). The bioelectrical impedance analysis at 50 kHz explained the 89% of ECW variability when resistance and reactance corrected for height are considered with gender group and weight (R2 = 0.89, p < 0.001, SEE = 1.7 liters). In conclusion, the bioelectrical method at 1 kHz can be considered sufficiently accurate in ECW prediction in healthy subjects and in fluid retention states. Also, the bioelectrical impedance analysis at 50 kHz is useful for predicting ECW, but his role must be further investigated.
Differences were observed in the yield and spatial correlation, at a molecular size scale characteristic of loop dimensions, of the double-strand breaks induced by gamma-rays and by light ions. These effects may have a role in the observed different cell response to these radiations.
RBE for inactivation with high-LET protons increased with the cellular radioresistance to gamma-rays. The cell line with the greatest resistance to gamma-rays was the most responsive to the highest LET proton beam. A similar trend has also been found in studies reported in the literature with He, C, N ions with LET in the range 20-125 keV/microm on human tumour cell lines.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.