1989
DOI: 10.1080/09553008914550101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RBE-LET Relationship for the Survival of V79 Cells Irradiated with Low Energy Protons

Abstract: The survival of V79 Chinese hamster cells irradiated with proton beams with energies of 0.73, 0.84, 1.16, 1.70 and 3.36 MeV, corresponding to LET values, evaluated at the cell midplane, of 34.5, 30.4, 23.9, 17.8 and 10.6 keV/micron respectively, have been studied in the dose range 0.5-6.0 Gy. As a reference, the survival curve obtained with 200 kV X-rays was used. The initial shoulder, typical of survival curves obtained with sparsely ionizing radiation, decreases as the LET increases and completely disappears… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, experimental data on proton RBE versus LET d (Folkard et al 1996, Belli et al 1989, 1993, Perris et al 1986, Coutrakon et al 1997, Wouters et al 1996, Schettino et al 2001 and proton RBE versus (α/β) x (Gerweck andKozin 1999, Paganetti et al 2000) indicate that RBE increases with increasing LET d (note that for protons the eventual decrease with LET d happens at LET d values irrelevant for clinical considerations) but decreases with increasing (α/β) x . The current data sets used to relate RBE with LET d and (α/β) x are subject to uncertainties (Carabe et al 2012, Carabe 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, experimental data on proton RBE versus LET d (Folkard et al 1996, Belli et al 1989, 1993, Perris et al 1986, Coutrakon et al 1997, Wouters et al 1996, Schettino et al 2001 and proton RBE versus (α/β) x (Gerweck andKozin 1999, Paganetti et al 2000) indicate that RBE increases with increasing LET d (note that for protons the eventual decrease with LET d happens at LET d values irrelevant for clinical considerations) but decreases with increasing (α/β) x . The current data sets used to relate RBE with LET d and (α/β) x are subject to uncertainties (Carabe et al 2012, Carabe 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study has suggested that DNA double-strand breaks, potentially lethal damage and sublethal damage, depend on LET and are closely between RBE and LET for protons is not clear and only few data are available. However, at LET values ranging from about 6 to 30 keV ,um-', RBE values drastically increase, and reach a peak value at about 30 keV im-' (Belli et al, 1989;1993;Folkard et al, 1989;Prise et al, 1990). We were therefore interested in whether there is a uniformity of radiobiological effectiveness in a relatively poorly understood region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actual RBE value is important for the determination of the effective dose to the tumor region. When irradiated with low energy proton, RBE is increased in non-human cell line (Belli et al, 1989(Belli et al, , 1998. RBE values for proton beam therapy with SOBP relative to γ-ray are evaluated in vitro and in vivo system; for various cells ranging from 0.7 to 2.1 (Paganetti et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%