1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1980.tb00940.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF ITALIAN, GREEK AND ANATOLIAN MARBLES THROUGH A PETROLOGICAL STUDY AND THE EVALUATION OF Ca/Sr RATIO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
6

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
33
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that these data refer to the marble holotypic varieties and have a general and not absolute validity (anomalous compositions and characteristics are always possible, especially near the contact areas of marbles with embedding rocks). The fabric of a marble is diagnostically very important since it is related to the type and degree of metamorphism undergone by its original sedimentary protolith (Lazzarini et al 1980). A first general fabric classification is based upon the equal or different dimensions of the calcite or dolomite crystals, referred to as homeoblastic (HO) or heteroblastic (HE), respectively.…”
Section: The Petrographic Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that these data refer to the marble holotypic varieties and have a general and not absolute validity (anomalous compositions and characteristics are always possible, especially near the contact areas of marbles with embedding rocks). The fabric of a marble is diagnostically very important since it is related to the type and degree of metamorphism undergone by its original sedimentary protolith (Lazzarini et al 1980). A first general fabric classification is based upon the equal or different dimensions of the calcite or dolomite crystals, referred to as homeoblastic (HO) or heteroblastic (HE), respectively.…”
Section: The Petrographic Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of various analytical methods allow many sources to be positively identified (Craig and Craig, 1972;Coleman and Walker, 1979;Lazzarini et al, 1980;Herz, 1987;Mello et al, 1988;Moens et al, 1988;Tsirambides, 1996;Vakoulis, 2000;Attanasio et al, 2003;Capedri et al, 2004;Melfos, 2004;Perugini et al, 2004). In particular, only one method is not enough for recognizing marbles, and so the most recent and effective approaches usually combine different techniques, such as mineralogical composition, petrographic analysis, stable isotopes ( 13 C and 18 O) and trace element analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A szemcseméret mellett a márványok szövete is diagnosztikai jelentőséggel bír, hiszen a kőzetet ért meta morfózis fokát tükrözi (GORGONI et al 1998, LAZZARINI et al 1980. A márványok esetében a szemcseméret eloszlása szerint alapvetően két fő szöveti kategóriát különböztetnek meg a metamorf kőzettanban általáno san használt granoblasztos szövet pontosításaként: a homeo blasztos és a hetero blasztos szövetet.…”
Section: Szemcseméret Eloszlásunclassified