Key PointsQuestionWhat effect does continued treatment with 2.4 mg of subcutaneous semaglutide have on the maintenance of body weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes?FindingsIn this randomized clinical trial of adults with overweight or obesity, 803 participants completed a 20-week run-in of weekly treatment with subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg, with a mean weight loss of 10.6%, and were randomized to continued treatment with subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo for an additional 48 weeks. At the end of this time, mean weight change was −7.9% vs +6.9%, respectively, a difference that was statistically significant.MeaningAmong adults with overweight or obesity completing a 20-week run-in period, maintaining treatment with subcutaneous semaglutide compared with switching to placebo resulted in continued weight loss.

No abstract

RRMS patients in remission had altered expression of miRNAs. We validated miR-145 as a potential diagnostic biomarker for the diagnosis of MS in blood, plasma and serum.

In neutralizing antibody (NAb)-positive patients without an MxA response, we were not able to detect differential expression of any of the 1077 interferon (IFN) beta-regulated genes identified in NAb-negative patients. Lack of MxA in vivo response in patients with multiple sclerosis with NAbs is a reliable marker of a completely blocked biologic response to IFNbeta, with no indication of residual bioactivity.

Our findings suggest that endogenous IFN-β may induce the expression of immunoregulatory IL10 in MS and that this might be associated with dampening of inflammatory disease activity.

BackgroundNumerous cytokines are implicated in the immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS), but studies are often limited to whole blood (WB) or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), thereby omitting important information about the cellular origin of the cytokines. Knowledge about the relation between blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell expression of cytokines and the cellular source of CSF cytokines is even more scarce.MethodsWe studied gene expression of a broad panel of cytokines in WB from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients in remission and healthy controls (HCs). Subsequently we determined the gene expression of the dysregulated cytokines in isolated PBMC subsets (CD4+, CD8+T-cells, NK-cells, B-cells, monocytes and dendritic cells) from RRMS patients and HCs and in CSF-cells from RRMS patients in clinical relapse and non-inflammatory neurological controls (NIND).ResultsRRMS patients had increased expression of IFN-gamma (IFNG), interleukin (IL) 1-beta (IL1B), IL7, IL10, IL12A, IL15, IL23, IL27, lymphotoxin-alpha (LTA) and lymphotoxin-beta (LTB) in WB. In PBMC subsets the main sources of pro-inflammatory cytokines were T- and B-cells, whereas monocytes were the most prominent source of immunoregulatory cytokines. In CSF-cells, RRMS patients had increased expression of IFNG and CD19 and decreased expression of IL10 and CD14 compared to NINDs. CD19 expression correlated with expression of IFNG, IL7, IL12A, IL15 and LTA whereas CD14 expression correlated with IL10 expression.ConclusionsUsing a systematic approach, we show that expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood primarily originates from T- and B-cells, with an important exception of IFNG which is most strongly expressed by NK-cells. In CSF-cell studies, B-cells appear to be enriched in RRMS and associated with expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines; contrarily, monocytes are relatively scarce in CSF from RRMS patients and are associated with IL10 expression. Thus, our findings suggest a pathogenetic role of B-cells and an immunoregulatory role of monocytes in RRMS.

Background: In people with overweight or obesity, long-term maintenance of weight loss is challenging. Subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, has shown clinically-relevant weight loss in a phase 2 trial in people with obesity. STEP 4 investigated the impact of continued semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment, vs switching to placebo, on maintenance of weight loss in participants who reached 2.4 mg of semaglutide during a run-in period. Methods: This was a 68-week withdrawal trial (NCT03548987) in 902 subjects aged ≥18 years with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (or BMI ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity), without diabetes. Following a 20 week run-in period, 803 subjects who reached the maintenance dose of once-weekly (OW) s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg were randomized 2:1 to continue treatment with semaglutide 2.4 mg or switch to placebo for 48 weeks, both as adjunct to lifestyle intervention. The primary endpoint was percentage change in body weight between randomization (week 20) and week 68. Confirmatory secondary endpoints included change in waist circumference and systolic blood pressure. Two estimands were defined: treatment policy and trial product; results are presented for the treatment policy estimand, unless stated otherwise. Results: Mean body weight (±SD) was 107.2 ±22.7 kg at week 0 and 96.1 ±22.6 kg at randomization (week 20; mean change -10.6%). Randomized participants were mostly female (79%) and white (84%); mean age was 46 years and mean BMI was 34.4 kg/m2. Between weeks 20–68, estimated mean body weight change was −7.9% vs +6.9% for semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: −14.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −16.0, −13.5; p<0.0001), and -8.8% vs 6.5%, respectively, for the trial product estimand (ETD: -15.3%; 95% CI: -16.5, -14.1; p<0.0001). For participants randomized to continue semaglutide, the estimated change in body weight from week 0–68 was -17.4% (-18.2% for trial product estimand). Continued semaglutide treatment (weeks 20–68) led to clinically-relevant improvements in waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, BMI, HbA1c, FPG, and lipids (total cholesterol, LDL, VLDL, and triglycerides) vs switching to placebo (p<0.0001 for all). During the run-in period, 5.3% of participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events; during the randomized period, 2.4% (semaglutide) and 2.2% (placebo) discontinued. Nausea, diarrhea and constipation (mostly transient and mild-to-moderate) were the most frequent adverse events with semaglutide. Conclusion: In adults with overweight or obesity, continued treatment after dose escalation with OW s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg until week 68 led to clinically-relevant weight loss, while switching to placebo led to significant weight regain; these data underscore the chronicity and relapsing nature of obesity, and the need for continued treatment.

Objective: Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) occur in a proportion of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with interferon (IFN)-b. NAbs impair the effect of treatment. The biological effect of IFN-b can be measured as the induction of the myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) molecule. However, other markers could be more sensitive for evaluating the response to IFN-b. We used DNA array analysis to identify genes that are strongly induced in blood cells by IFN-b, and measured their expression in MS patients with different NAb levels. Methods: Gene expression was studied on DNA arrays in untreated patients, in NAb negative patients, and in MS patients with varying NAb levels 9-12 h and 36-48 h after IFN-b administration. The expression of selected genes was measured by realtime PCR. NAb levels were assessed by a cytopathic effect assay. Results: Several hundred genes were induced 9-12 h after an injection of IFN-b. The molecules CXCL10, CCL2 and IFI27 were among the most strongly induced. Gene induction was generally much less pronounced after 36-48 h, but IFI27 remained strongly induced. The strong induction of these molecules and MxA was confirmed by real-time PCR. Induction of MxA, CCL2, CXCL10 and IFI27 was reduced in patients with low NAb levels and lost in patients with intermediate/high NAb levels. Conclusion: We identify IFI27, CCL2 and CXCL10 as sensitive biomarkers for the response to IFN-b. The expression of these markers adequately reflects bioactivity of IFN-ß as documented by the decreased induction in low NAb-positive patients and the lost induction in patients with moderate/high NAb levels.