Key PointsQuestionWhat effect does continued treatment with 2.4 mg of subcutaneous semaglutide have on the maintenance of body weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes?FindingsIn this randomized clinical trial of adults with overweight or obesity, 803 participants completed a 20-week run-in of weekly treatment with subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg, with a mean weight loss of 10.6%, and were randomized to continued treatment with subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo for an additional 48 weeks. At the end of this time, mean weight change was −7.9% vs +6.9%, respectively, a difference that was statistically significant.MeaningAmong adults with overweight or obesity completing a 20-week run-in period, maintaining treatment with subcutaneous semaglutide compared with switching to placebo resulted in continued weight loss.

Gastric bypass (GBP) surgery, one of the most common bariatric procedures, induces weight loss and metabolic effects. The mechanisms are not fully understood, but reduced food intake and effects on gastrointestinal hormones are thought to contribute. We recently observed that GBP patients have lowered glucose levels and frequent asymptomatic hypoglycemic episodes. Here, we subjected patients before and after undergoing GBP surgery to hypoglycemia and examined symptoms and hormonal and autonomic nerve responses. Twelve obese patients without diabetes (8 women, mean age 43.1 years [SD 10.8] and BMI 40.6 kg/m 2 [SD 3.1]) were examined before and 23 weeks (range 19-25) after GBP surgery with hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp (stepwise to plasma glucose 2.7 mmol/L). The mean change in Edinburgh Hypoglycemia Score during clamp was attenuated from 10.7 (6.4) before surgery to 5.2 (4.9) after surgery. There were also marked postsurgery reductions in levels of glucagon, cortisol, and catecholamine and the sympathetic nerve responses to hypoglycemia. In addition, growth hormone displayed a delayed response but to a higher peak level. Levels of glucagonlike peptide 1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide rose during hypoglycemia but rose less postsurgery compared with presurgery. Thus, GBP surgery causes a resetting of glucose homeostasis, which reduces symptoms and neurohormonal responses to hypoglycemia. Further studies should address the underlying mechanisms as well as their impact on the overall metabolic effects of GBP surgery.Gastric bypass (GBP) surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity induces marked weight loss and metabolic effects.Excess BMI loss is typically ;70-80% (1), and almost instant changes occur in glucose homeostasis postsurgery, including frequent remission of diabetes up to 70% (1). After a meal, the rise in glucose and insulin is ;50% higher, reflecting the faster absorption of glucose postsurgery. Incretins are also affected; prandial gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) peak at ;2 and 10 times higher levels after surgery, respectively (2).The sustained weight loss achieved by GBP surgery, superior to that achieved by diet regimens, reflects lowered caloric intake and possibly altered secretion of gastrointestinal peptides (2). Comparing eating habits before and after the GBP surgery, patients lowered the intake with marked reductions in carbohydrate intake in the form of sweets, soda, and milk/ice cream. Fear of dumping was suggested as the main mechanism (3). Dumping can occur within 10-30 min of food intake when, in the absence of a pyloric function, it quickly enters the intestine and produces an osmotic effect. Fluid is shifted from the circulation into the intestine, resulting in a fall of blood pressure and tachycardia. In a rat model, similar food preference adaptations evolved with time, indicating that the preference shift was dependent on learning and dumping (4).In a recent study with continuous glucose monitoring (5), we observed hypoglycemic epis...

Objective: The number of morbidly obese subjects submitted to bariatric surgery is rising worldwide. In a fraction of patients undergoing gastric bypass (GBP), episodes with late postprandial hypoglycemia (PPHG) develop 1-3 years after surgery. The pathogenesis of this phenomenon is not fully understood; meal-induced rapid and exaggerated increases of circulating incretins and insulin appear to be at least partially responsible. Current treatments include low-carbohydrate diets, inhibition of glucose intestinal uptake, reduction of insulin secretion with calcium channel blockers, somatostatin analogs, or diazoxide, a K ATP channel opener. Even partial pancreatectomy has been advocated. In type 2 diabetes, GLP1 analogs have a well-documented effect of stabilizing glucose levels without causing hypoglycemia. Design: We explored GLP1 analogs as open treatment in five consecutive GBP cases seeking medical attention because of late postprandial hypoglycemic symptoms. Results: Glucose measured in connection with the episodes in four of the cases had been 2.7, 2.5, 1.8, and 1.6 mmol/l respectively. The patients consistently described that the analogs eliminated their symptoms, which relapsed in four of the five patients when treatment was reduced/discontinued. The drug effect was further documented in one case by repeated 24-h continuous glucose measurements.Conclusion: These open, uncontrolled observations suggest that GLP1 analogs might provide a new treatment option in patients with problems of late PPHG.

No abstract

Design: Gastric bypass (GBP) and duodenal switch (DS) in morbid obesity are accompanied by marked metabolic improvements, particularly in glucose control. In recent years, episodes of severe late postprandial hypoglycemia have been increasingly described in GBP patients; data in DS patients are scarce. We recruited three groups of subjects; 15 GBP, 15 DS, and 15 non-operated overweight controls to examine to what extent hypoglycemia occurs in daily life. Methods: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was used during 3 days of normal activity. The glycemic variability was measured by mean amplitude of glycemic excursion and continuous overall net glycemic action. Fasting blood samples were drawn, and the patients kept a food and symptom log throughout the study. Results: The GBP group displayed highly variable CGM curves, and 2.9% of their time was spent in hypoglycemia (!3.3 mmol/l, or 60 mg/dl). The DS group had twice as much time in hypoglycemia (5.9%) and displayed CGM curves with little variation as well as lower HbA1c levels (29.3 vs 35.9 mmol/mol, P!0.05). Out of a total of 72 hypoglycemic episodes registered over the 3-day period, 70 (97%) occurred in the postprandial state and only about one-fifth of the hypoglycemic episodes in the GBP and DS groups were accompanied by symptoms. No hypoglycemias were seen in controls during the 3-day period. Conclusion: Both types of bariatric surgery induce marked, but different, changes in glucose balance accompanied by frequent, but mainly unnoticed, hypoglycemic episodes. The impact and mechanism of hypoglycemic unawareness after weight-reduction surgery deserves to be clarified.

While Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery in obese individuals typically improves glycemic control and prevents diabetes, it also frequently causes asymptomatic hypoglycemia. Previous work showed attenuated counterregulatory responses following RYGB. The underlying mechanisms as well as the clinical consequences are unclear. In this study, 11 subjects without diabetes with severe obesity were investigated pre- and post-RYGB during hyperinsulinemic normo-hypoglycemic clamps. Assessments were made of hormones, cognitive function, cerebral blood flow by arterial spin labeling, brain glucose metabolism by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography, and activation of brain networks by functional MRI. Post- versus presurgery, we found a general increase of cerebral blood flow but a decrease of total brain FDG uptake during normoglycemia. During hypoglycemia, there was a marked increase in total brain FDG uptake, and this was similar for post- and presurgery, whereas hypothalamic FDG uptake was reduced during hypoglycemia. During hypoglycemia, attenuated responses of counterregulatory hormones and improvements in cognitive function were seen postsurgery. In early hypoglycemia, there was increased activation post- versus presurgery of neural networks in brain regions implicated in glucose regulation, such as the thalamus and hypothalamus. The results suggest adaptive responses of the brain that contribute to lowering of glycemia following RYGB, and the underlying mechanisms should be further elucidated.

Background: In people with overweight or obesity, long-term maintenance of weight loss is challenging. Subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, has shown clinically-relevant weight loss in a phase 2 trial in people with obesity. STEP 4 investigated the impact of continued semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment, vs switching to placebo, on maintenance of weight loss in participants who reached 2.4 mg of semaglutide during a run-in period. Methods: This was a 68-week withdrawal trial (NCT03548987) in 902 subjects aged ≥18 years with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (or BMI ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity), without diabetes. Following a 20 week run-in period, 803 subjects who reached the maintenance dose of once-weekly (OW) s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg were randomized 2:1 to continue treatment with semaglutide 2.4 mg or switch to placebo for 48 weeks, both as adjunct to lifestyle intervention. The primary endpoint was percentage change in body weight between randomization (week 20) and week 68. Confirmatory secondary endpoints included change in waist circumference and systolic blood pressure. Two estimands were defined: treatment policy and trial product; results are presented for the treatment policy estimand, unless stated otherwise. Results: Mean body weight (±SD) was 107.2 ±22.7 kg at week 0 and 96.1 ±22.6 kg at randomization (week 20; mean change -10.6%). Randomized participants were mostly female (79%) and white (84%); mean age was 46 years and mean BMI was 34.4 kg/m2. Between weeks 20–68, estimated mean body weight change was −7.9% vs +6.9% for semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: −14.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −16.0, −13.5; p<0.0001), and -8.8% vs 6.5%, respectively, for the trial product estimand (ETD: -15.3%; 95% CI: -16.5, -14.1; p<0.0001). For participants randomized to continue semaglutide, the estimated change in body weight from week 0–68 was -17.4% (-18.2% for trial product estimand). Continued semaglutide treatment (weeks 20–68) led to clinically-relevant improvements in waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, BMI, HbA1c, FPG, and lipids (total cholesterol, LDL, VLDL, and triglycerides) vs switching to placebo (p<0.0001 for all). During the run-in period, 5.3% of participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events; during the randomized period, 2.4% (semaglutide) and 2.2% (placebo) discontinued. Nausea, diarrhea and constipation (mostly transient and mild-to-moderate) were the most frequent adverse events with semaglutide. Conclusion: In adults with overweight or obesity, continued treatment after dose escalation with OW s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg until week 68 led to clinically-relevant weight loss, while switching to placebo led to significant weight regain; these data underscore the chronicity and relapsing nature of obesity, and the need for continued treatment.

No abstract