2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02716.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of new sensitive biomarkers for the in vivo response to interferon‐β treatment in multiple sclerosis using DNA‐array evaluation

Abstract: Objective: Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) occur in a proportion of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with interferon (IFN)-b. NAbs impair the effect of treatment. The biological effect of IFN-b can be measured as the induction of the myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) molecule. However, other markers could be more sensitive for evaluating the response to IFN-b. We used DNA array analysis to identify genes that are strongly induced in blood cells by IFN-b, and measured their expression in MS patients w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further evidence comes from a recent study, which reports fully abrogated CXCL-10 gene expression in patients with low NAb titers and remaining MxA expression. 13 One could conclude that some IFN-b stimulated genes are less affected by anti-IFN-b antibodies than others, a factor that might contribute to the "grey zone" of NAb assays; however, in the present study comparison is limited, as MxA was determined at the RNA and CXCL-10 at the protein level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Further evidence comes from a recent study, which reports fully abrogated CXCL-10 gene expression in patients with low NAb titers and remaining MxA expression. 13 One could conclude that some IFN-b stimulated genes are less affected by anti-IFN-b antibodies than others, a factor that might contribute to the "grey zone" of NAb assays; however, in the present study comparison is limited, as MxA was determined at the RNA and CXCL-10 at the protein level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Currently identified and validated biomarkers are useful in initial diagnosis of MS versus NMO (aquaporin-4 antibody), predicting conversion to RRMS after CIS (CSF OCB) and interpreting treatment failure in patients on IFN-β therapy (IFN-β neutralizing antibodies), but are clearly not infallible (Table 10). It is possible that multiplex arrays and statistical algorithms that examine multiple biomarkers simultaneously may provide better sensitivity and specificity [10,62,85,[138][139][140][141][142]. Reliable biomarkers of disease activity and therapeutic response would assist in guiding treatment decisions and improving long-term outcomes in MS. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Serum levels of CXCL8, CXCR3, CCL5 and IP-10 increase during relapse with MRI activity, while levels of CCL2 (MCP1) decline [82][83][84]. CCL2 and CXCL10 levels are strongly induced by IFN-β treatment and lost in the presence of IFN-β neutralizing antibodies, but their correlation with disease activity is unknown [85]. Serum levels of the chemokine IL-8 in the first trimester of pregnancy have been shown to predict patients at risk of post-partum relapse [86].…”
Section: Chemokinesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Gene expression levels are given as normalization ratio (NR) calculated by: NR = 2 -ΔCt(sample) - ΔCt(pool) [23]. Gene expression in PBMCs was analyzed on the Affymetrix Human Genome Focus Gene Chip as previously described [24]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%