Establishment of the Constitutional Court marks a new era in the power of the judiciary system in Indonesia. Some areas that had not been touched (Untouchables) by law, such as judicial review issues on the Constitution, can now be done by the Constitutional Court, including the authority, other authority provided for in the 1945 Constitution after the amendment. Besides, the existence of the Constitutional Court must also be equipped with a clear organizational structure, adequate procedural law, legal principles and sources of law that the Constitutional Court made reference in carrying out its duties and judicial authority. The emergence of the Constitutional Court as a principal judicial authorities are expected to become entry points which promote the establishment of a modern system of judicial authority in Indonesia.
The implementation of group representative accusation especially for legal standing in the practice ofjudge in Indonesia is still faced with the handicaps procedural technically. The regulation oflegislation isstill restricted in law material, while in formal law (the court ofjustice) is not regulated clearly. The uncertain ofprocedure informal law (the court of justice) in its regulation is really not the handicaps for thejudge for taking thejust deci sion, because thejudge can apply the otherlaw resource. Although, it has been issued PERMA No. 1 the year 2002 that regulate the group representative accusation, for the next it should be formulated strictly in the new Justice Court of Code Procedures. The group representative accusation is the moresimple justice alternative, quick and low cost.
This research is focused on the impact of globalization within the justice, welfare, and democracy, as well as to the question about what kind of law that is possible to create the justice and the welfare in the middle of democracy crisis is and also the question about how to apply that in Indonesia's court. This study uses socio-legal approach which is mainly committing a quantitative method, based on the literature data. By using socio-legal approach, this study will conduct two kind approaches, which are social and normative juridical. This research makes claim that the globalization has finally made an impact to the happen of economy discriminatory and the widen case of poverty. Poverty will lead a bad impact to the democracy. In a situation of elitist legislation product, the settlement of law that is based on the legalpositivism tradition, it will give impact to the spread of discrimination and poverty. Because of it, in the middle of elitism legislation product, the progressive application of law can be considered as the alternative way to bring out the justice and the welfare for the people. The practice of Indonesia's court has shown its development to the law's progressive movement, nevertheless, the legal-positivism mainstream is still laid on several judges. AbstrakPenelitian ini difokuskan pada dampak globalisasi terhadap keadilan, kesejahteraan dan demokrasi serta konsep hukum yang bagaimanakah yang lebih memungkinkan untuk mewujudkan keadilan dan kesejahteraan rakyat di tengah krisis demokrasi dan bagaimanakah pelaksanaan dalam praktik pengadilan di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam studi ini adalah socio-legal approach yang bersifat kualitatif, berdasarkan data kepustakaan. Dengan pendekatan socio-legal approach, studi ini menggunakan dua pendekatan, yaitu pendekatan sosial dan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan globalisasi telah mengakibatkan terjadinya kesenjangan (ketidakadilan) ekonomi dan meluasnya kemiskinan. Kemiskinan akan berdampak buruk terhadap demokrasi. Dalam situasi produk legislasi yang elitis, maka penerapan hukum yang didasarkan pada tradisi legal-positivism, akan semakin memperluas ketidakadilan dan kemiskinan. Karena, itu, di tengah situasi produk legislasi yang elitis, penerapan hukum secara progresif, merupakan cara alternatif yang lebih memungkinkan untuk mewujudkan keadilan dan kesejahteraan rakyat. Praktik pengadilan di Indonesia, menunjukkan mulai berkembangnya cara-cara penerapan hukum yang progresif, namun tradisi legal-positivism masih menjadi mainstream para hakim.
The role of Judicial Commission in enforcing law has not been optimal, especially in conducting its function and authority to conduct external supervision of judges. The problem addressed in this research is what effort should be done to strengthen the role of Judicial Commission for law enforcement in Indonesia. The approach used in this research is juridical normative, and data source in this research is secondary data, which are primary, secondary, tertiary law material. Furthermore, the law material is analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The research result shows that Judicial Commission needs to strengthen its role in enforcing law through the effort in: a. accelerating the revision of responsive and visionary Law of Judicial Commission; b. strengthening the role of institutional; c. strengthening institution in conducting external supervision, both preventively and repressively; d. reforming regulation in the field of justice in order to harmonize and synchronize the laws of Judicial Power, Supreme Court, Constitutional Court and the Judicial Commission; and e. strengthening and arranging its organization and personnel.
Our research attempts to understand the absolute competence of arbitration and its development in practice as well as the effect of the parties' choice of jurisdiction in a contract containing arbitration clause. This research is expected to be able to explain the competence dispute between arbitration and court to justiciables. We find that choice in jurisdiction would negate the rights of the parties to submit their dispute to district court. In practice, deviation where courts may ignore the arbitration clause, the parties' good faith and consistency of the court play a significant role to further develop the arbitration process. Penelitian yuridis-normatif ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui kompetensi absolut arbitrase dan perkembangannya dalam praktik, serta akibat hukum pilihan forum dalam kontrak berklausula arbitrase bagi para pihak yang berpekara. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menerangkan para pencari keadilan perihal sengketa kewenangan mengadili antara arbitrase dan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pilihan forum akan meniadakan hak para pihak dan sikap pengadilan yang konsisten memiliki peranan besar untuk mengembangkan arbitrase.
Legal aid is a crucial instrument in the justice system as it serves the part in the protection of human rights for every citizen, including people who cannot afford it. This study examines and analyzes the roles and responsibilities of legal aid organizations (OBH) in providing access to justice for free legal services in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY), as well as the obstacles that occur in providing the free legal services. The type of research used is empirical juridical, supported by primary, secondary and tertiary data sources. The method used comprises of sociological, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The results of the study concluded that the role of OBH in DIY in providing free legal services has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of the law. The procedure for providing legal aid on a free basis is still based on several requirements, including that the applicant must apply for legal aid on a free basis, including a Certificate of Disadvantage (SKTM) from the village administration. The provision of legal assistance by OBH is carried out through litigation and non-litigation. There are two responsibilities of OBH in providing legal assistance on a free basis, namely responsibility to institutions/foundations and responsibilities as an advocate so that in providing legal assistance must be professional. Obstacles faced by OBH are both in juridical and non-juridical barriers.
This article describes the perspective of being friendly to children, women, special needs groups and the elderly on public transportation services in Bandar Lampung City. Using a qualitative research approach with interview, observation and documentation data collection techniques, it shows that the technical aspects, social aspects, gender aspects, disability aspects, and environmental aspects that are expected in public transportation services are not fulfilled. The Bandarlampung City Government does not yet have a legal basis that specifically pays attention to groups of children, women, special needs and the elderly.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.