Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia

Sutiyoso, Bambang

doi:10.31078/jk762

Cited by 17 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Untuk lebih mudah dalam memahami kedudukan peradilan (yudikatif) di Indonesia terlebih dahulu perlu diketahui susunan kekuasaan negara yang ada di Indonesia (Sutiyoso & Hastuti, 2005) Mengingat Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan subyek dari kekuasaan kehakiman itu sendiri, dan perlu diketahui bahwa makna kekuasaan kehakiman sama arti dan tujuannya dengan kekuasaan peradilan atau judicial power, yakni kekuasaan yang menjalankan fungsi dan kewenangan peradilan guna menegakkan hukum dan keadilan atau rule of law dalam Negara Republik Indonesia. Apabila dicermati, uraian tersebut berarti kalau makna kedudukan peradilan itu sama artinya dengan kedudukan MA dan MK sebagai badan yudikatif.…”

Section: Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman DI Indonesiaunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Problematika Pengangkatan dan Perberhentian Hakim Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman Mahkamah Agung Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia

Agustian,

Setiawati,

Alexander

2023

hutanasyah

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article 24A paragraph 3 provides a provision that candidates for Supreme Court justices are proposed by the Judicial Commission to the House of Representatives for approval and to subsequently be appointed as chief justices by the president and the Supreme Court Law states that the appointment of Supreme Court Judges is carried out by the President on the proposal of the House of Representatives or the dismissal of the Chairman, Vice Chairman, Junior Chairman, and Member Judges of the Supreme Court is dismissed by the President on the proposal of the Supreme Court, so that the President, the House of Representatives (DPR, and the Judicial Commission (KY) have loopholes that can later influence the psychic judges in making decisions if the case is related to the 3 (three) institutions. This study aims to determine the Independence of Judicial Power in Indonesia. This research includes library research, research whose data sources are obtained through good literature sources and laws and regulations and using normative and juridical approaches, the Compiler concludes that the proposal for the appointment and dismissal of Supreme Court judges by the Judicial Commission, the House of Representatives and the President may affect the psychic of a judge in making a decision so that this can eliminate the meaning of Article 24 paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution which shows less independence of judicial power in upholding justice in accordance with the ideals of the 1945 Constitution.

show abstract

Section: Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman DI Indonesiaunclassified

“…Apabila dicermati, uraian tersebut berarti kalau makna kedudukan peradilan itu sama artinya dengan kedudukan MA dan MK sebagai badan yudikatif. Dengan demikian selain MA berkedudukan sebagai lembaga tinggi negara juga berkedudukan sebagai lembaga peradilan tertinggi (Sutiyoso & Hastuti, 2005).…”

Section: Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman DI Indonesiaunclassified

Problematika Pengangkatan dan Perberhentian Hakim Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman Mahkamah Agung Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia

Agustian,

Setiawati,

Alexander

2023

hutanasyah

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The existence of the Constitutional Court serves to deal with some instances in the field of statehood and maintain the implementation of a stable government (Sutiyoso, 2016). The Constitutional Court is the perpetrator of the independent judicial power to hold the judiciary to uphold law and justice (Darmadi, 2020).…”

Section: Review Of Constitutional Court Decision No 91/puu-viii/2020mentioning

confidence: 99%

Industrial Relations with Specific Time Work Agreements after the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 in The Perspective of Legal Justice

Shalihah

2022

JHN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction toThe Problem: The constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 stated that the establishment of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation contradicts the 1945 Constitution and is considered conditional unconstitutional. Thus, within two years of Law No. 11 of 2020, its derivative rules are still enforced until there is an improvement. However, two years is a legal certainty, but it is uncertain in the business and industrial worlds. Purpose/Objective Study: This study aims to find out how the effect of the issuance of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on the implementation of Law No. 11 of 2020 on the Employment Cluster and its derivative rules and how alternative efforts in creating harmonious industrial relations on the issue of working relations with Specific Time Work Agreements after the constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method used is doctrinal legal research.Findings: This research resulted in a study that the influence of constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 impacts the uncertainty of legal protection guarantees in the business and the industrial world. Because it takes two years to implement the provisions of Law No. 11 of 2020 in the Employment cluster and its derivative rules, namely Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021, the business and the industrial world cannot implement the provisions without any guarantee of sustainable time, and it will lead to injustice in industrial relations. One alternative to continue creating harmonious industrial relations with Specific Time Work Agreements is to return to local wisdom, prioritizing the principle of consensus deliberation that prioritizes the parties' agreement in working relations including the fulfillment of rights in compensation payments when there is a termination of employment.

show abstract

“…Law enforcers have a very important position as a means of social control in their position as law enforcers. There are 3 things that affect the performance of law enforcement officers including: [19] a. Law enforcement agencies b.…”

Section: Sanctions For Violation Of Speed Bumps Provisions In Tangera...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Application of Speed Bumps Rules as a Speed Limiting Tool to Provide Road User Safety in Tangerang City Based on the Minister of Transportation Regulation Number 82 of 2018

Sudiro,

Pondaag

2022

Proceedings of the 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Road users who do a lot of speeding have raised concerns about safety in using the road in social life, so that many people of Perumnas II Tangerang City are independently involved in the procurement of speed bumps but without paying attention to the provisions for the construction of speed bumps as stipulated in Permenhub 82/2018 This research is an empirical research where data is obtained through observation and interviews. So far, the sanctions given by the relevant law enforcement officers (Police and Transportation Service) are only in the form of warnings to those who build speed bumps that do not comply with the rules. Until now, the people of Perumnas II Tangerang City have not received socialization from the Tangerang City Government regarding the provisions for the procurement of speed bumps in accordance with Permenhub 82/2018 . It is necessary to provide legal counseling regarding the provisions for the procurement of speed bumps in order to provide benefits for road users and the law can be applied effectively.

show abstract

Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia

Cited by 17 publications

References 0 publications

Problematika Pengangkatan dan Perberhentian Hakim Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman Mahkamah Agung Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia

Problematika Pengangkatan dan Perberhentian Hakim Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman Mahkamah Agung Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia

Industrial Relations with Specific Time Work Agreements after the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 in The Perspective of Legal Justice

The Application of Speed Bumps Rules as a Speed Limiting Tool to Provide Road User Safety in Tangerang City Based on the Minister of Transportation Regulation Number 82 of 2018

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About