AbstrakKetentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan pada pasal 59 secara umum telah diketahui belum efektif, karena selain pengawasan dari pemerintah tidak berjalan, juga disebabkan oleh faktor kebutuhan lapangan pekerjaan pada kenyataannya lebih terhadap pekerjaanpekerjaan yang sifatnya tetap. Konsekuensi dari status hukum pekerja akibat pekerjaannya merupakan bagian inti dari proses produksi juga di dalam penerapannya tidak berjalan, sebab pengusaha tetap berpatokan kepada waktu 2 tahun dan pembaharuan untuk perpanjangan masa PKWT selama 1 tahun. Dalam praktek masa tenggang 30 hari yang diwajibkan oleh undang-undang juga lebih banya diabaikan, sebab pekerja tidak menginginkan kehilangan penghasilan karena tidak bekerja selama satu bulan. Menurut penulis, pengaturan yang tidak efektif di atas perlu dikaji ulang dengan mengedepankan kepentingan dari ke dua belah pihak. Sebuah aturan tidak akan mungkin bisa berjalan apabila tidak mencerminkan kebutuhan hukum dari masyarakat. Jika pembuat undang-undang bermaksud memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap pekerja waktu tertentu dengan batasan waktu bekerja, maka rentang waktu yang diberikan menurut penulis layak dengan waktu maksimal 2 (dua) tahun tanpa ada permakluman lagi. Sehingga mau tidak mau setelah 2 tahun jika pengusaha tetap akan memakai pekerja dalam hubungan kerja wajib menaikkan statusnya sebagai pekerja waktu tidak tertentu atau pekerja tetap dengan menjamin semua hak-hak melekat padanya. Hukum dapat dijalankan sangat dipengaruhi oleh budaya hukum dari kesadaran hukum masyarakat. Budaya hukum yang baik sangat dipengaruhi oleh kesadaran hukum yang tinggi. Hukum ketenagakerjaan telah dibuat sedemikian rupa untuk menjamin terjaminnya hak-hak pekerja dalam hal ini adalah pekekja waktu tertentu. Kesadaran hukum akan menjadi barang mahal apabila faktor bergerak dalam menentukan efektif dan tidak efektifnmya sebuah produk hukum tetap mencari celah pembenar dalam melakukan hal-hal yang melanggar hak asasi pekerja.
The negative impact of the use of law as a means of changing society in authoritarian countries is seen already clear when in authority a regime that was decades on authority in Keywords: Legal, Moral and Authority AbstrakDampak negatif penggunaan hukum sebagai sarana perubahan masyarakat dalam negara otoriter terlihat sudah secara terang benderang ketika berkuasanya sebuah rezim yang puluhan tahun berkuasa di Indonesia. Rezim tersebut mengatasi semua kekuatan yang ada dalam masyarakat dan birokrasinya sangat menentukan. Partai-partai politik pada era itu tidak
Since the inception of the Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 the acknowledgment of the human rights protection for each person has been arranged, so it is hoped that there is no violation of human rights and crimes in every country in the world. Every human being has the right to live peacefully and carry out every activity of religious beliefs without any oppression. But this does not happen to the Rohingya tribes of Burma and the Uyghur tribes of China. So far, various facts have shown that human rights violations have been held against them, both in sustaining life and in exercising their religious beliefs. Countries should give space and comfort to act as perpetrators of human rights crimes against them. The United Nations, ASEAN or other international organisations, as well as other countries cannot do much of the human rights abuses and humanitarian crimes. This paper will discuss how the international legal view of the human rights abuses is. The results showed that human rights violations against the Rohingya ethnicity and the Uyghur people had violated international law provisions. It should be a proven leader of the country with its policies to have committed human rights violations and humanitarian crimes could be judged international Criminal Court (ICC) as perpetrators of humanitarian crimes and could not be sheltered behind the country. Need the courage and firmness of the UN in addressing this if it still puts the law as a regulator of peace and Order of the world.
The special protection of traditional cultural expressions is governed by Berne Convention 1886 and also in its revision (Paris Convention) in 1971, which is mentioned in Article 15 paragraph (4). The traditional cultural expression or Folklore is one of the protected parts for its existence because it is one of the characteristics and identity of a nation. This identity shows the level of cultural nobility of a nation thus its existence must be maintained. The Law recognized by the world community as a place to maintain the expression of traditional culture into the identity of a nation is by giving Copyright to it. As part of Copyright, the protection of traditional cultural expressions is obtained automatically; it means that traditional cultural expressions are protected directly by the law since it was first announced. In principle, intellectual property rights have been attached to the community without having to register. The protection of copyright against traditional cultural expressions in Indonesia is a hereditary culture. Therefore, it has become the common property of the Indonesian nation. And Indonesia has synchronized the legal arrangements in its national law mentioned in articles 38 and 39 of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright. The barrier in protecting traditional cultural expressions in Indonesia is mostly due to the understanding of the traditional ownership of traditional cultural expressions over communal ownership. So in order to hit the cultural barriers, socialization and inure of Copyright are needed to be socialized to the public.
<em>This paper </em><em>aimed to analyze</em><em> human rights violations against migrant fishing boat crews with a case study on the Chinese-flagged Long Xing fishing boat. The research method used is empirical legal research using primary data and secondary data. The results showed that there had been human rights violations experienced by migrant fishing boat crews aboard the Chinese-flagged Long Xing fishing boat. These human rights violations have occurred since the pre-employment phase. The act of dumping the bodies of the crew members of Indonesian ships into the sea in the case of the Long Xing Ship violated the provisions of the ILO Seafarers Regulation Article 30 concerning protocol if the crew of the ship died, also violated Indonesia's national regulations, namely the Minister of Transportation Regulation No. 84 of 2013 Article 18 concerning the protocol for repatriating the bodies of crew members. Therefore, Indonesia's Government needs serious improvements to protect Indonesian fishing boat crews by implementing legal protection regarding their rights both before, during, and after Indonesian migrant fishery crew members work abroad</em>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.