The massive use of plastic, from the production process to the disposal, will release a lot of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, which will exacerbate climate change. The large amount of plastic waste that can not be decomposed and eventually carried away into the sea is estimated to cause more plastic than fish in the ocean in 2050. Indonesia is the second-largest country in the production of marine plastic debris in the world after China. It occurs because of a misleading in waste management while still on land. Plastic debris in the marine will adversely affect the ecosystem in the sea and also the coastal. The reduction of marine debris will not run optimally if it is not supported by active involvement from the government, producers, and the community. This research was normative research based on primary and secondary legal materials. This study aimed to review the implementation of policies based on action plans to reduce marine debris. The result showed that with the baseline marine debris policy at 0.49 - 0.86 million tonnes/year, it required acceleration efforts from the government, producers, and the community to reduce marine debris by 70% by 2025.
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>This study discusses the synchronization of domain name and Trademark regulation in Indonesia. This</p><p>research is normative legal research is prescriptive to vertical and horizontal level of synchronization. The approach used in this legal research is the statue approach and the conceptual approach (conseptual</p><p>approach). The source of research can be distinguished to be a source of research in the form of primary</p><p>legal materials in the form of Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, Law Number 11 Year 2008 juncto 19 Year 2016 on Information and Electronic Transactions and its regulations below.</p><p>Secondary legal material from the doctrines of jurists, and other non-legal materials. The results showed</p><p>that both regulation have not been there any match between one another. First, in terms of registration</p><p>of the first principle to the legal file of the Trademark and the principle of domain name registration is first file first serve is a different principle so that many disputes after the domain name obtained. Second, interms of ownership, domain names obtained on lease are not the same objects as Trademarks so they</p><p>can not be equalized. Sync can be done by adding settings on whois system optimization and revising</p><p>the domain name law.</p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Domain name, Trademark, legal concept</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Penelitian ini membahas tentang sinkronisasi pengaturan nama domain dan hak merek di Indonesia.</p><p>Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif terhadap taraf sinkronisasi vertikal</p><p>dan horizontal. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian hukum ini adalah pendekatan undangundang</p><p>(statue approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach). Sumber penelitian dapat</p><p>dibedakan menjadi sumber penelitian yang berupa bahan hukum primer berupa Undang –Undang Nomor</p><p>20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis , Undang- Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 juncto 19</p><p>Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik beserta peraturan- peraturan dibawahnya. Bahan</p><p>hukum sekunder dari doktrin-doktrin para ahli hukum, dan bahan non-hukum lainnya. Hasil penelitian</p><p>menunjukkan bahwa kedua pengaturan tersebut belum terdapat adanya kesesuaian antara satu dengan</p><p>yang lainnya. Pertama, dilihat dari segi pendaftarannya asas first to file hukum merek dan asas pendaftaran nama domain yaitu first file first serve merupakan asas yang berbeda sehingga dapat banyak sengketa setelah nama domain didapatkan. Kedua, dilihat dari kepemilikannya, nama domain didapatkan secara sewa bukan merupakan objek yang sama dengan merek sehingga keduanya tidak dapat dipersamakan. Sinkronisasi dapat dilakukan dengan menambahkan pengaturan mengenai optimaliasi sitem whois dan merevisi undang- undang nama domain.</p><p><strong>Kata Kunci : </strong>nama domain, merek, sinkronisasi</p>
The current study aimed at discovering the notary' challenge during their attempt at obtaining legal protection when facing an allegation of committing criminal activity. In carrying out their duty as a public officer who is authorized to make authentic deed and other authorities under the law, Notary needs to obtain legal protection for the sake of legal certainty and legal service function. The current study could be classified as an empirical legal study. This study employed primary and secondary data collected from interviews and document analysis. The collected data were analyzed by using an interactive model of qualitative analysis technique. Based on article 66 paragraph (1) of Law of The Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2014 about the changes to the law number 30 of 2004 regarding position of notary, it has been regulated that for judicial process, investigators, public prosecutors, or judges shall obtain the consent from The Notary Honorary Council to perform an investigation towards a Notary. Notary Honorary Council is an institution that borns to provide legal protection towards a Notary. Especially Regional Notary Honorary Council who is authorized in this case, by its panel of Inspector. However, in fact, there are several factors which make notaries had not felt optimal legal protection from the Regional Notary Honorary Council.
<p>Abstract<br />This article was aimed to find out the resolution of bad credits with Collateral procedures are taken over (AYDA) at the Regional Company BPR Bank Klaten the effort against the debtor as one lender protection efforts. This research is a study of empirical law that is descriptive to describe. Data collection techniques are conducted with interviews, observations or observations literature studies. Based on the results of the research and the discussion produced drawing a<br />conclusion. First, the settlement of bad credit at the Regional Company BPR Bank Klaten with the debtor sent by the provision of a warning letter for three times, then do the call in written and spoken, then do negosiation to turn over as collateral by AYDA perform procedure. Second, the impediments that experienced by the Regional Company BPR Bank Klaten in the face of non-perfoming loans that is a lack of idea of being careful with a field officer, the existence of<br />faith not good from a debtor, and the existence of the disasters which hit a debtor. While from the regulation those are many requirements in notarial required in AYDA, and the term of selling collateral maximum one year.</p><p>Keywords: Settlement Of Bad Credit; AYDA; The Protection Of Creditors; The Company Of The Rural Banks.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penyelesaian kredit macet dengan prosedur Agunan yang diambil alih (AYDA) pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Klaten terhadap debitur sebagai salah satu upaya perlindungan kreditur. Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penelititan hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan yaitu wawancara narasumber dan studi kepustakaan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, dihasilkan simpulan. Kesatu, penyelesaian kredit macet pada BPR Klaten dengan debitur dilakukan dengan pemberian Surat Peringatan hingga tiga kali, kemudian melakukan pemanggilan secara lisan dan tertulis, kemudian negosiasi untuk menyerahkan agunan dengan melaksanakan prosedur AYDA. Kedua, hambatan yang dialami oleh BPR Klaten dalam menghadapi kredit macet yaitu kurangnya ketelitian petugas lapangan, adanya itikad tidak baik dari debitur, dan adanya musibah yang menimpa debitur. Sedangkan dari regulasi, hambatan yang ada yaitu banyaknya persyaratan secara Notarial yang dibutuhkan dalam AYDA, dan jangka waktu penjualan yang terlalu cepat yaitu maksimal satu tahun.</p><p>Kata Kunci: Penyelesaian Kredit Macet; AYDA; Perlindungan Kreditur; Perseroan Daerah BPR Bank Klaten.</p>
<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to review the responsibilities of a notary who has a position as an Acting Land Acting Officer (PPAT) in making a Power of Attorney to Charge Mortgage. This legal research uses empirical research methods, namely examining primary data in the field then proceed with secondary data. SKMHT must be made with a notary deed or deed of Land Deed Maker (PPAT), this is in line with what has been written and stipulated in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Underwriting Rights (UUHT). Making SKMHT made by a notary is guided by Article 38 of Act Number 2 of 2014 juncto Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position, whereas if the manufacture is carried out by PPAT then follow the rules stated in the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 8 2012 (Perkaban 8/2012). The implementation of related regulations that have been written and stipulated is in fact there is a conflict issue, namely that there is a provision of notaries required to make SKMHT using the SKMHT format which is regulated in Perkaban Number 8 of 2012.<br />Keywords: Responsible; Notary; PPAT; Deed of Power of Attorney to Charge Mortgage</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji mengenai tanggung jawab notaris yang memiliki jabatan sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) di dalam membuat Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan (SKMHT). Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode penelitian empiris, yaitu meneliti data primer di lapangan kemudian dilanjutkan dengan data sekunder. SKMHT wajib dibuat dengan akta notaris atau akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT), hal ini selaras dengan yang telah tertulis dan ditetapkan di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan (UUHT). Pembuatan SKMHT yang dibuat oleh notaris berpedoman pada Pasal 38 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 juncto UndangUndang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, sedangkan apabila pembuatannya dilakukan oleh PPAT maka mengikuti aturan yang telah tertera di dalam Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 (Perkaban 8/2012). Implementasi regulasi terkait yang telah ditulis dan ditetapkan tersebut nyatanya justru terdapat persoalan, yakni bahwa ada ketentuan notaris diwajibkan membuat SKMHT dengan menggunakan format SKMHT yang diatur di dalam Perkaban Nomor 8 Tahun 2012.<br />Kata Kunci: Tanggung Jawab; Notaris; PPAT; Akta SKMHT</p>
<p align="center"><em>Abstract</em></p><p><em>The aim of this article is to review and analyze the management policy of Ujungnegoro-Roban Coastal Park. This research type is empirical research with qualitative approach. Data source used is primary and secondary data source. Primary data sources were obtained through interviews with officials in the relevant offices, while secondary data was obtained through literature studies. Ujungnegoro-Roban Coastal Park was formed based on the Decree of the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia No. Kep.29 / Men / 2012 on the Determination of Coastal Areas and Small Islands Ujungnegoro-Roban Batang Regency in Central Java Province. The coastal park is formed because it meets the criteria in Regulation of Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries No. Per.17 / Men / 2008 concerning Conservation Area in Coastal Areas and Small Islands. Ujungnegoro-Roban coastal park potentially damaged coral reef ecosystem, mangrove, abrasion, and sedimentation. Coastal management policy in Ujungnegoro-Roban Coastal Park has been implemented by the Government of Batang Regency such as the installation of artificial reefs and mangrove planting. With the transfer of authority of the coastal park management from the district government to the provincial government, a regional regulation on zoning plan that divides the sea space so as to realize conservation objectives.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong><em> Policy; conservation; coastal areas; protection.</em></p><p align="center">Abstrak</p><p>Tujuan artikel ini adalah mengkaji dan menganalisis kebijakan pengelolaan Taman Pesisir Ujungnegoro-Roban.Jenis penelitian ini yaitu penelitian empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif.Sumber data yang digunakan adalah sumber data primer dan sekunder. Sumber data primer diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan pejabat pada dinas terkait, sedangkan data sekunder diperoleh melalui studi pustaka.Taman Pesisir Ujungnegoro-Roban dibentuk berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia Nomor Kep.29/Men/2012 Tentang Penetapan Kawasan Konservasi Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil Ujungnegoro-Roban Kabupaten Batang di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Taman pesisir tersebut dibentuk karena memenuhi kriteria dalam Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Nomor Per.17/Men/2008 tentang Kawasan Konservasi di Wilayah Pesisir dan Pulau-pulau Kecil.Taman pesisir Ujungnegoro-Roban berpotensi mengalami kerusakan ekosistem terumbu karang, mangrove, abrasi, serta sedimentasi.Kebijakan pengelolaan wilayah pesisir di Taman Pesisir Ujungnegoro-Roban sudah dilaksanakan oleh Pemerintah Kabupaten Batang diantaranya dengan pemasangan terumbu karang buatan dan penanaman mangrove.Dengan berpindahnya kewenangan pengelolaan taman pesisir dari pemerintah kabupaten ke pemerintah provinsi, maka diperlukan peraturan daerah tentang rencana zonasi yang membagi ruang laut sehingga dapat mewujudkan tujuan konservasi.</p><p><strong>Kata kunci</strong>: Kebijakan; konservasi;wilayah pesisir;perlindungan.</p>
For bank, loan is one of its core business. In addition to profitability, loan also contains credit risk. Accordingly, Financial Services Authority (OJK) as the supervisory authority of Indonesian banks enforces the credit regulation in Indonesia. This is understandable given that improper credit management may result in bank’s revenue from credit sector, which may disturb the bank’s health due to the decrease of bank's revenue. Therefore, resolution of problem loan is priority for banks. The present study was categorized as normative legal study, the data were analyzed qualitatively. Various attempts were maed to resolve problem loans. One of them is through the filing of small claim court. A number of easiness can be chosen because small claim court is relatively quick and cheap. In the future, the government is expected to provide more pathways to make small claim court, including increasing the maximum nominal of the charge.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.