The massive use of plastic, from the production process to the disposal, will release a lot of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, which will exacerbate climate change. The large amount of plastic waste that can not be decomposed and eventually carried away into the sea is estimated to cause more plastic than fish in the ocean in 2050. Indonesia is the second-largest country in the production of marine plastic debris in the world after China. It occurs because of a misleading in waste management while still on land. Plastic debris in the marine will adversely affect the ecosystem in the sea and also the coastal. The reduction of marine debris will not run optimally if it is not supported by active involvement from the government, producers, and the community. This research was normative research based on primary and secondary legal materials. This study aimed to review the implementation of policies based on action plans to reduce marine debris. The result showed that with the baseline marine debris policy at 0.49 - 0.86 million tonnes/year, it required acceleration efforts from the government, producers, and the community to reduce marine debris by 70% by 2025.
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>This study discusses the synchronization of domain name and Trademark regulation in Indonesia. This</p><p>research is normative legal research is prescriptive to vertical and horizontal level of synchronization. The approach used in this legal research is the statue approach and the conceptual approach (conseptual</p><p>approach). The source of research can be distinguished to be a source of research in the form of primary</p><p>legal materials in the form of Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, Law Number 11 Year 2008 juncto 19 Year 2016 on Information and Electronic Transactions and its regulations below.</p><p>Secondary legal material from the doctrines of jurists, and other non-legal materials. The results showed</p><p>that both regulation have not been there any match between one another. First, in terms of registration</p><p>of the first principle to the legal file of the Trademark and the principle of domain name registration is first file first serve is a different principle so that many disputes after the domain name obtained. Second, interms of ownership, domain names obtained on lease are not the same objects as Trademarks so they</p><p>can not be equalized. Sync can be done by adding settings on whois system optimization and revising</p><p>the domain name law.</p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Domain name, Trademark, legal concept</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Penelitian ini membahas tentang sinkronisasi pengaturan nama domain dan hak merek di Indonesia.</p><p>Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif terhadap taraf sinkronisasi vertikal</p><p>dan horizontal. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian hukum ini adalah pendekatan undangundang</p><p>(statue approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach). Sumber penelitian dapat</p><p>dibedakan menjadi sumber penelitian yang berupa bahan hukum primer berupa Undang –Undang Nomor</p><p>20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis , Undang- Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 juncto 19</p><p>Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik beserta peraturan- peraturan dibawahnya. Bahan</p><p>hukum sekunder dari doktrin-doktrin para ahli hukum, dan bahan non-hukum lainnya. Hasil penelitian</p><p>menunjukkan bahwa kedua pengaturan tersebut belum terdapat adanya kesesuaian antara satu dengan</p><p>yang lainnya. Pertama, dilihat dari segi pendaftarannya asas first to file hukum merek dan asas pendaftaran nama domain yaitu first file first serve merupakan asas yang berbeda sehingga dapat banyak sengketa setelah nama domain didapatkan. Kedua, dilihat dari kepemilikannya, nama domain didapatkan secara sewa bukan merupakan objek yang sama dengan merek sehingga keduanya tidak dapat dipersamakan. Sinkronisasi dapat dilakukan dengan menambahkan pengaturan mengenai optimaliasi sitem whois dan merevisi undang- undang nama domain.</p><p><strong>Kata Kunci : </strong>nama domain, merek, sinkronisasi</p>
The current study aimed at discovering the notary' challenge during their attempt at obtaining legal protection when facing an allegation of committing criminal activity. In carrying out their duty as a public officer who is authorized to make authentic deed and other authorities under the law, Notary needs to obtain legal protection for the sake of legal certainty and legal service function. The current study could be classified as an empirical legal study. This study employed primary and secondary data collected from interviews and document analysis. The collected data were analyzed by using an interactive model of qualitative analysis technique. Based on article 66 paragraph (1) of Law of The Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2014 about the changes to the law number 30 of 2004 regarding position of notary, it has been regulated that for judicial process, investigators, public prosecutors, or judges shall obtain the consent from The Notary Honorary Council to perform an investigation towards a Notary. Notary Honorary Council is an institution that borns to provide legal protection towards a Notary. Especially Regional Notary Honorary Council who is authorized in this case, by its panel of Inspector. However, in fact, there are several factors which make notaries had not felt optimal legal protection from the Regional Notary Honorary Council.
<p>Abstract<br />This article was aimed to find out the resolution of bad credits with Collateral procedures are taken over (AYDA) at the Regional Company BPR Bank Klaten the effort against the debtor as one lender protection efforts. This research is a study of empirical law that is descriptive to describe. Data collection techniques are conducted with interviews, observations or observations literature studies. Based on the results of the research and the discussion produced drawing a<br />conclusion. First, the settlement of bad credit at the Regional Company BPR Bank Klaten with the debtor sent by the provision of a warning letter for three times, then do the call in written and spoken, then do negosiation to turn over as collateral by AYDA perform procedure. Second, the impediments that experienced by the Regional Company BPR Bank Klaten in the face of non-perfoming loans that is a lack of idea of being careful with a field officer, the existence of<br />faith not good from a debtor, and the existence of the disasters which hit a debtor. While from the regulation those are many requirements in notarial required in AYDA, and the term of selling collateral maximum one year.</p><p>Keywords: Settlement Of Bad Credit; AYDA; The Protection Of Creditors; The Company Of The Rural Banks.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penyelesaian kredit macet dengan prosedur Agunan yang diambil alih (AYDA) pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Klaten terhadap debitur sebagai salah satu upaya perlindungan kreditur. Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penelititan hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan yaitu wawancara narasumber dan studi kepustakaan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, dihasilkan simpulan. Kesatu, penyelesaian kredit macet pada BPR Klaten dengan debitur dilakukan dengan pemberian Surat Peringatan hingga tiga kali, kemudian melakukan pemanggilan secara lisan dan tertulis, kemudian negosiasi untuk menyerahkan agunan dengan melaksanakan prosedur AYDA. Kedua, hambatan yang dialami oleh BPR Klaten dalam menghadapi kredit macet yaitu kurangnya ketelitian petugas lapangan, adanya itikad tidak baik dari debitur, dan adanya musibah yang menimpa debitur. Sedangkan dari regulasi, hambatan yang ada yaitu banyaknya persyaratan secara Notarial yang dibutuhkan dalam AYDA, dan jangka waktu penjualan yang terlalu cepat yaitu maksimal satu tahun.</p><p>Kata Kunci: Penyelesaian Kredit Macet; AYDA; Perlindungan Kreditur; Perseroan Daerah BPR Bank Klaten.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.