2017
DOI: 10.1177/1469540517736522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youth fans of global popular culture: Between prosumer and free digital labourer

Abstract: The subculture of urban global popular-culture youth fans is believed to be a resistance-subculture against the hegemony of dominant power. This study, however, found that the subculture given rise to by the urban, global popular-culture youth fans of ‘the Mortal Instruments’ in Indonesia is in opposition to the Neo-Gramscian thought which has become the foundation of popular-culture studies. In constructing their identity, some of the digital fandoms of global popular culture have been critical of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
21

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
59
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…In the post-modern era, the lifestyles developed by youths are reflected in not only what they consume but also how they consume industrial-cultural products [1]. Urban youths also have the hegemony for consuming capitalist products [2]. In major cities, youths’ shopping activities are not only conducted offline but also online.…”
Section: Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the post-modern era, the lifestyles developed by youths are reflected in not only what they consume but also how they consume industrial-cultural products [1]. Urban youths also have the hegemony for consuming capitalist products [2]. In major cities, youths’ shopping activities are not only conducted offline but also online.…”
Section: Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumer productivity has been stimulated through new information and communication technologies, mainly through the interactions on the internet (Chen, 2018;Sugihartati, 2020), boosted by the Web 2.0 (Collins, 2010;Laughey, 2010). Due to this scenario, Ritzer and Jurgenson (2010) name contemporary productive consumers as Web 2.0 prosumers -people who demonstrate a unique productive competence, being able to modify the productive process of what they consume, as well as influence it by elevating the degree of awareness of products and services.…”
Section: The Prosumerist Face Of the Fansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than performing an operational productive role in consumption, Web 2.0 prosumers become specialized consumers and act as co-producers of their own consumer experiences (Ritzer, 2014;Stuart-Menteth, Wilson, & Baker, 2006). This usually occurs jointly and engaged (Morreale, 2013;Sugihartati, 2020), through dialogic relations (Hartmann, 2015;Ritzer, 2014), when they are responsible for sharing content and materials related do the consumer products (Collins, 2010;Ritzer et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Prosumerist Face Of the Fansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the understanding of the economic and cultural capacity of a major sports league like the NFL (Wenner, 2014), we focus on the virtual interactions of the audience that complement the transmission of the games in Brazil. Such interactions were revealed as fan practices, an interdisciplinary theme that, for consumer research, are understood as productive actions (i.e., prosumers) to the cultural object (Chen, 2018;Sugihartati, 2017). As the cultural object in question (i.e., NFL) is close to the culture of one of the countries that most makes use of its soft brand (Nye Jr., 2015), we understand this practice provides an acculturation of consumption (Segev et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%