1986
DOI: 10.1177/0022002186017004002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work Centrality in Japan and the United States

Abstract: A concept called work centrality is developed to represent the generalized importance of working to individuals. Work centrality results for national samples of the labor force in Japan and in the United States are presented. A large difference is found between the measured work centrality levels in Japan and the United States. Several potential explanatory rationales are examined concerning this large work centrality difference.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
0
4

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in accordance with Lundberg and Peterson [53] and England and Misumi [54] . This suggests that Japanese have instituted similar cultures in Malaysia and even perhaps that our Malaysian culture, may be more attracted to traditional careers with an average tenure of 9.2 years with the current employer and in contrast to the boundaryless career concept that capture the working lives of Americans more accurately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding is in accordance with Lundberg and Peterson [53] and England and Misumi [54] . This suggests that Japanese have instituted similar cultures in Malaysia and even perhaps that our Malaysian culture, may be more attracted to traditional careers with an average tenure of 9.2 years with the current employer and in contrast to the boundaryless career concept that capture the working lives of Americans more accurately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Tal modelo identifica como facetas do significado do trabalho: a centralidade do trabalho, os atributos valorativos e descritivos e a hierarquia dos mesmos. A centralidade do trabalho refere-se à importância que o indivíduo atribui ao trabalho, comparando-o às outras esferas de vida: família, lazer, religião e comunidade (England e Misumi, 1986;MOW, 1987).…”
Section: Referencial Teóricounclassified
“…A terceira escala (expectativas) mensura quatro fatores: (1) Justiça no Trabalho e Auto-Expressão, (2) Desgaste e Desumanização, (3) Bem-estar e Independência e (4) Responsabilidade. A quarta escala (instrumentalidade) mensura, por sua vez, quatro fatores: (1) O segundo questionário refere-se à Centralidade do Trabalho (England e Misumi, 1986;MOW, 1987;Soares, 1992) e consiste em apenas duas questões. Na primeira, o participante atribui pontos a cinco esferas de vida (família, trabalho, lazer, religião e comunidade) de forma que a soma dos pontos seja igual a 100.…”
Section: Métodounclassified
“…Work is a highly significant activity for most individuals in modern societies (England & Misumi, 1986), and work settings have long been a popular focus of psychological research. It is also recognized that intercultural studies contribute to an understanding of worker psychology, because work has different value and different effects across societies (Hofstede, 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent comparative studies indicate both important psychological similarities and differences. For the most part, work is highly valued (England & Misumi, 1986) in both societies, but it is defined somewhat differently by national samples of Japanese and Americans (England & Harpaz, in press). In England and Harpaz's study, people in both cultures defined work primarily (1) as a way to earn money, (2) as a way of producing something of value, and (3) as the execution of a task or project.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%